Pros And Cons Of Torture

In times of political strain, fear can lead to the development of criminals that put nations at risk. In these circumstances, the lives of many are put in danger, for when parties grow agitated, these political issues become militaristic. Often times, when these attackers and threats are captured, they undergo inspection to gain information that could potentially save thousands. In many circumstances, interrogation alone cannot assist with the gathering of this information, so torture is used as an alternative. Despite the potential for torture to provide such information when the security of the nation is at stake, it is not justifiable because not only does it violate the rights of the detainee, but it also runs the risk of being incredible.

It is understandable that some people possess no qualms about utilizing torture, for often times these detainees are affiliated with a system that puts the lives of many in danger. However, in this viewpoint, attention is placed solely on the organization and the enemy as a whole rather than on the single individual being detained. Moreover, many fail to recognize torture’s violations of international laws. After WWII, the Geneva Convention was held in order to establish clear definitions of the rights of civilians and enemies alike. One such right stated that “Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited, and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention” (Geneva Convention, Article 12). Such laws were created to demonstrate how regardless of the dangers that occur during battle, morality must continue to exists in order for humanity to be maintained. Partaking in the practice of torture is not only a violation of international morals, but a refusal to acknowledge past atrocities as well. From this, it can be seen how torture will only lead to further suffering and