ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Torture

1251 Words6 Pages

Torture is a technique that has been used for centuries, starting in the middle ages. The case for torture has been and always will be a highly debatable topic. Some may ask is the case for torture really necessary in some cases? Will the United States be subject to terrorist attacks if torture is avoided? Is there really a happy medium? Many argue that without torture the United States would not be as strong of a Country today. Others believe that torture has done nothing but cause the United States more harm than good. Both the positives and negatives of using torture is controversial, when discussed among many across the world.
Many might believe that torture is unconstitutional and immoral, but according to Michael Levin in “The Case for …show more content…

Dershowitz in “The Case for Torture Warrants”, the choice for using torture should be made with visibility and accountability, either by a judicial officer or by the President of the United States. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, the FBI officials made it publicly known that they were not able to obtain information from suspected terrorists conventionally, which caught many American’s attention. Many debated the case for torture among suspects who have access to deadly information after these attacks. This was also debated in Israel, when the Israeli Supreme Court outlawed all use of torture by law enforcement even though it's officials got suspects to open their mouths after suffering torture. Dershowitz believes that a torture warrant is a plausible solution to this nation wide debate. Obtaining a warrant would be systematic, judges would require enough compelling evidence before issuing a warrant to any official, and even after getting the warrant the official would tell the suspect that he would gain immunity if they told them the information they wanted, if that did not work then they would resort to torture. Dershowitz argues that the suspects rights would be better protected with a warrant and he states that the case of torture should be discussed now, before anything detrimental happens to the United States. He also believes that the case of torture should be public, and the decision should be made by public figures that are accountable and on the highest

Open Document