ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Torture

1251 Words6 Pages

Torture is a technique that has been used for centuries, starting in the middle ages. The case for torture has been and always will be a highly debatable topic. Some may ask is the case for torture really necessary in some cases? Will the United States be subject to terrorist attacks if torture is avoided? Is there really a happy medium? Many argue that without torture the United States would not be as strong of a Country today. Others believe that torture has done nothing but cause the United States more harm than good. Both the positives and negatives of using torture is controversial, when discussed among many across the world.
Many might believe that torture is unconstitutional and immoral, but according to Michael Levin in “The Case for …show more content…

Dershowitz in “The Case for Torture Warrants”, the choice for using torture should be made with visibility and accountability, either by a judicial officer or by the President of the United States. After the terrorist attacks on September 11, the FBI officials made it publicly known that they were not able to obtain information from suspected terrorists conventionally, which caught many American’s attention. Many debated the case for torture among suspects who have access to deadly information after these attacks. This was also debated in Israel, when the Israeli Supreme Court outlawed all use of torture by law enforcement even though it's officials got suspects to open their mouths after suffering torture. Dershowitz believes that a torture warrant is a plausible solution to this nation wide debate. Obtaining a warrant would be systematic, judges would require enough compelling evidence before issuing a warrant to any official, and even after getting the warrant the official would tell the suspect that he would gain immunity if they told them the information they wanted, if that did not work then they would resort to torture. Dershowitz argues that the suspects rights would be better protected with a warrant and he states that the case of torture should be discussed now, before anything detrimental happens to the United States. He also believes that the case of torture should be public, and the decision should be made by public figures that are accountable and on the highest

Show More
Related

Article Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

185 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “The Case for Torture”, Michael Levin argues that the use of torture as a way to save lives is justifiable and necessary. Levin draws a series of cases where torture might be acceptable so as to set certain precedent for the justification of torture in more realistic cases. HoweverLevin illustrates three cases where torture might be justifiable.he describes a terrorist keeping city of millions hostage to an atomic bomb, the second, a terrorist who has implanted remote bombs on a plane and the third, a terrorist who has kidnapped a baby. torture and its consequences have been recorded in countries around of world over a vast span of time, and for a variety of reasons. Levin makes no such attempt to expand his article beyond

Read More

Summary Of Should The Ticking Bomb Prisoner By Alan Dershowitz

1694 Words | 7 Pages

The first option Dershowitz brings is to allow security services to continue to use torture in a “twilight zone which is outside the realm of law.” The second option is to claim that the state is lawful and doesn’t allow torture while turning a blind eye to the torture occurring behind closed doors. The third option, clearly the choice preferred by Dershowitz, is the road of truth. It is the road of transparency which creates a framework for torture to limit it and prevent terrorism. The fourth option is simply to have no torture whatsoever and allowing “preventable terrorist acts to occur.”

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture's Terrible Toll, By John Mccain

699 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

Read More

Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

686 Words | 3 Pages

The Case for Torture Wins Torture is it morally acceptable? Many have debated this argument but I would like to bring up two main conflicting view points from Michael Levin, and Marzieh Ghisai. Michael Levin is a Jewish law professor who wrote The Case for Torture where he advocates where torture is acceptable in some circumstances.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Foreign Policies Of Carter And Reagan

828 Words | 4 Pages

Foreign Policies of Carter and Reagan Critical Thinking Assignment Overtime America has worked its way to becoming an important international power. The country upholds this position by establishing the proper systems to maintain being a strong country that is able to defend itself and protect its people’s needs. Both Presidential leaders Jimmy Carter and Ronald Regan would work to help America develop a good position on international affairs in a time where the country had faced conflict over it borders. During both of their presidential terms, the Cold War was going on where they would both adopt new measures to ease the tension between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

313 Words | 2 Pages

Many people might think that torture is cruel, unacceptable and it does not show humanity. In contrast, Michael Levin says that implementing torture is needed to prevent future evil acts. In “The Case for Torture”, Michael Levin also makes it clear that there are situations in which torture is not merely acceptable but morally necessary. Levin argues that implementing torture to save people lives is morally right and reasonable. Levin’s purpose of his text is to let people know that there are times when torture becomes an option to save and protect innocent lives.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

918 Words | 4 Pages

In the reading “The Case for Torture” written by Michael Levin, and published on the June 7th, 1982 edition of Newsweek. Levin argues in favor of torture as an acceptable way of obtaining information when innocent lives are at stake. Outlining three separate scenarios devised to make the reader reconsider the stance on torturer in order to protect the interest of those in the western area. The strength of this text is that the absence of reasoning does not strike the reader; he is overcome by Levin’s ability to break ethical decisions down to black and white. Levin begins with describing torture as “morally mandatory”.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

971 Words | 4 Pages

In Michael Levin's The Case for Torture, Levin provides an argument in which he discusses the significance of inflicting torture to perpetrators as a way of punishment. In his argument, he dispenses a critical approach into what he believes justifies torture in certain situations. Torture is assumed to be banned in our culture and the thought of it takes society back to the brutal ages. He argues that societies that are enlightened reject torture and the authoritative figure that engage in its application risk the displeasure of the United States. In his perspective, he provides instances in which wrongdoers put the lives of innocent people at risk and discusses the aspect of death and idealism.

Read More

Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

581 Words | 3 Pages

Torture Explanation The Case for Torture is an article written by Michael Levin in which he discusses why torture should be used by the American government. He makes his case by stating highly unlikely hypothetical situations in which torture would be useful. I agree with the majority of the actual reasonable points that Levin uses in the article.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture Myth '

1050 Words | 5 Pages

While analyzing “The Torture Myth” and “The Case for Torture”, it is very clear to see the type of rhetorical appeals used to persuade the audience. Anne Applebaum, the writer of “The Torture Myth” --in context of the decision of electing a new Attorney General--would argue that torture is very seldomly effective, violates a person’s rights, and should be outlawed due to the irrational need upon which physical torture is used. On the other hand, Michael Levin strongly argues that physical torture is crucial to solving every imminent danger to civilians. Levin claims that if you don’t physically torture someone, you are being weak and want to allow innocent people to die over something that could have been simply done.

Read More

Ethical Arguments Against Torture

1032 Words | 5 Pages

My opposition to torture fall under the beliefs of the absolutist Kant, who states that no matter what the circumstance is, something that is wrong will always be wrong (Boothe 2006, 12). Therefore, concerning the issue of torture, in this world or any other world, torture is immoral. In this paper, I will employ the ethical frameworks of virtue, rights, and fairness to argue against torture when viewed from the perspective of the victim, the torturer, and any outside source. Furthermore, I will dismantle the ticking-bomb scenario by deducing the incapability to achieve full certainty deeming these scenarios unrealistic.

Read More

What Was Sullivan's Argument To The Abolition Of Torture?

586 Words | 3 Pages

In this paper I will discuss the issue of torture. More precisely, i will be looking at “The abolition of torture” by Sullivan and “The truth about torture: it’s time to be honest about doing a terrible thing” by Krauthammer. I will be arguing that Sullivan presents a better case than Krauthammer on the issue of whether a liberal democratic community ought to ever resort to torture, because i feel that Sullivan presents strong points and Krauthammer presents weak ones. I will begin by outlining the key points in Krauthammer’s argument, and then outline the points in Sullivan’s argument.

Read More

Is Torture Ever Ethical?

1207 Words | 5 Pages

Many experts argue that torture is an unreliable means of getting useful information. Weighing the costs and benefits of the use of torture has been a topic of debate since the tragic events of 9/11. Since the American government decided that the use of torture to gain information from suspected terrorists in the aftermath attacks of that day. Is the use of torture ever ethical?

Read More

Categorical Moral Reasoning

1005 Words | 5 Pages

In Defense of Torture “Because It Is Wrong:” A Meditation on Torture Rules Should Govern Torture, Dershowitz Says What ethical arguments are being made? Torture is okay to use. Torture is wrong. Torture should be okay in some circumstances

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Torture

955 Words | 4 Pages

Torture is a topic that has come under intense scrutiny and debate regarding whether there are any circumstances in which it should be employed, and if its is absolute legal ban should not be protected and respected. Recently, terrorism has brought to the public 's eye the violent tactics used by terrorist, against humanity. The September 11 terrorist attacks, in the New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, lead to the passing of the "Patriot Act" when George Bush signed a secret finding empowering CIA to "Capture, Kill, or Interrogate Al-Queda Leaders"( Bush, 2001:). The most predicted and widely publicized

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Torture

Related Topics

Open Document