ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Unitary Government

676 Words3 Pages

We all need to rise up against the British, we need all of the loyalists to turn their backs on the Crown as well. They think they have a legitimate reason to rule over our colonies, I repeat OUR colonies. They do not have any right over us like they believe they should. God gave us rights as men that can not be taken away and that’s all Britain is trying to do. One reason as to why we should uprise is so that we can form a unitary government, another is so we can finally have a representative in Parliament, and finally is because the king has denied us a voice and recognized us a the a union of states. First of all, don’t you want to have our own government in the colonies instead of being ruled by the British crown? Where we can make our own rules as a collective group instead of being ruled by a monarch? In Thomas Paine’s book “Common Sense,” Paine states, “The prejudice of Englishmen in favour of their own government by king, lords, and commons, arises as much or more from national pride than reason” (Paine 1). This statement is saying that even if you can’t see the reasoning behind …show more content…

The king will not give us that because he doesn’t want to better the colonies. “We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne” (Henry 1775). This means that anything and everything we ask for is being set aside and most of us are tired of the neglect from the King. If we have a representative then we can change the laws and taxes to help us benefit instead of

Show More
Related
275 Words | 2 Pages

With many losses to secure a stronghold in the provincial Congress the Patriot cause has been at a disadvantage. The Second Session of the Provincial Congress the petition to re-open the courts passed however it is under British rule. The very first act to not be in favor or help the patriot cause. Opening the courts under British rule will make passing laws and creating a new system more difficult. Americans wanting freedom from the British rule must take even more dangerous actions by way of mobs and a large amount of sacrifice the possibility of sending our men and sons to war to enable the Patriots a victory over his Majesty’s tyrannical ways.

Read More
1248 Words | 5 Pages

In the Declaration of Rights and Grievances issued by the Stamp Act Congress, they claimed that Parliament lacked the power to tax the colonies because they had no representation. While the Stamp Act was repealed, the colonists were never given representation in Parliament. In the “Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms”, issued by the Second Continental Congress, this same issue was cited as a justification for fighting. “[The British declare] that parliament can ‘of right make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever.’ What is to defend us against so enormous, so unlimited power?”

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Freedom Even though the colonists did not have a clear understanding of freedom because they were under the rule of a tyrant, the Speech in the Virginia Convention and Crisis #1, written by Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine, both motivated the colonists and congress to aspire and achieve freedom. Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry both used very similar quotes to motivate the colonists into realizing that fighting the British king would grant them freedom at last. No matter how many times the American colonists attempted to resolve things through petitions, remonstrations, and arguments the British were right there, smiling insidiously, but only proved to snare their feet. The colonists were tired of these lies and insults, so this is where Paine and Henry step in.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

We are reduced to … choosing … unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated [British officials], or resistance by force.” Colonists really did only have two choices. Parliament being able to make laws that are “binding in all cases whatsoever” is repugnant. The colonists, if they had not rebelled, would have essentially been slaves to Britain. Philosopher John Locke, in Document 8, describes what must be done to rulers in the colonists’ situation: “If a ruler … acts both as judge and participate in disputes, he puts himself in a state of war with his subjects and we have the right and the duty to kill such rulers and their servants.”

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, “A government of our own is our natural right: and when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human life, he will become convinced that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a deliberate manner.” This example presents that the government is the colonists’ right as well, because it is what they are being ruled by. When one thinks about life’s rollercoaster, it is believed that it is smarter and safer to have a formal constitution. This shows that the colonists should have a voice in their government, even though the king’s ideas are

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

I have attended the convention speech in Virginia and have learned that Great Britain is only causing us harm and that is something we should acknowledge. They have been going against us for 10 years and we have yet, to conquer peace. All colonies are under attack as they have restricted our trade, imposed taxes on us, and will not negotiate with us for any reason. From the state of Virginia, Patrick Henry, has imposed his persuasive speech to impose the actions the colonies must take against Great Britain. The colonies must form an armed resistance to defend as Great Britain is already

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

According to Paine, “Even though people of the colonies were paying taxes and were pushed into wars caused by British, they were unfairly not represented in the British Parliament”. (109) Since Paine’s main goal is to target the common man of the society; he directs his argument by using the Bible and emotions to back up his own discussion. Paine indicates that all people are born equally and there is no one given the power to rule over other human beings. Then he uses Bible quotes to explicitly disagree with the presence of Monarchy rule used by the Great Britain.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

The British government was not looking for the best of the people. They were only thinking about what they wanted; the government was not interested in what the people wanted so they decided to make decisions on their own, which resulted in changes that form the United States today. Because of this, they were justified in rebelling and declaring independence. One reason why the colonists decided to rebel and declare independence was because of taxation.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

“It is foolish to be always running three or four thousand miles with a tale or petition. Waiting four or five months for an answer, which when obtained requires five or six more to explain it” Paine is frustrated by a time lag to ask for king and parliament to address their opinions. So if the colonists formed their own independent country, they would not have to wait for a response from their goverment. The patriots love local control.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the excerpts of Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” he makes many compelling points on why America during that time was in the perfect position for independence. In the first paragraph Paine writes about how the economy of the colonies could thrive if they were not under the rule of the Britain. He makes points on how if America was not limited in trade by Britain and the colonies had its own legislative branch the economy would be a lot stronger. In the second paragraph Thomas Paine talks about how in the past if the colonies tried to rebel their military would not have been ready but during the time “Common Sense” was written the American military was ready. Another factor in why Paine supported Colonist independence was because it was

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Paine is against America having a connection with Britain and a single person having power. As Paine expresses, King George III is not and should not be able to be in power of the colonists because mankind is created to be equal and therefore kings should be “disapproved by nature” (Paine 217). Not only does Paine express his anger at the topic of a ruler for all, he also voices that America is connected to whatever Britain does and whatever problems Britain has: implying that America has no say what so ever under Britain (Paine 218). Paine is suggesting that Britain is not only hurting but also is subordinating America and its colonies, so a declaration of independence is in need.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

“It is wholly owing to the Constitution of the people, and not to the constitution of the government that the crown is not as oppressive in England as in Turkey.” We should give power to someone who is fair and not self-centered. Paine stated “from the errors of other nations, let us learn wisdom” to advise us to avoid repeating the past in the future from learning about bad past experiences. Paine argued for American’s separation from England by comparing the Kings that Great Britain has had to what a government should be

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Before this many Colonists did not know of the harsh injustices done by the British. They also did not believe that the cause for revolution was urgent. Thomas Paine showed them that the cause was urgent by explaining the wrongs the British had committed and why King George was a tyrant. He also showed them that America did not need the British Empire 's protection. This quote shows his reasoning “Small islands, not capable of protecting themselves, are the proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but there is something absurd, in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island.”

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

A contemporary ethical issue within Australia is Abortion. The topic of Abortion is a regularly discussed topic due to the two different opinions which are the Catholic Church perspective and the Australian Secular perspective. The Catholic Church perspective believes that abortion is wrong no matter what the circumstance. The Australian secular view believes that the mother and father should have the freedom to decide for themselves and that Abortion is acceptable in some situations. This essay explores the different opinions and reasonings from both perspectives.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Canada is one of the most wired countries in the world, with approximately eighty-seven per cent of households connected to the Internet (). Although Canada was once ranked among the world's leading providers of telecommunication services, many developing countries have surpassed our country’s standards. Canada's small number of telecommunications companies, which include BCE Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Telus Corp and Shaw, have settled in urban areas, and have done little to help and reach into rural Canadian settlements. There is a distinct divide between access for those in urban centres versus rural and remote households. Broadband is available to 100 per cent of Canadians in urban areas, compared to eighty-five per cent in rural areas ().

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Unitary Government

Related Topics

Open Document