ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of United States Nuclear Weapons

1333 Words6 Pages

The United States is by every metric the world’s sole, remaining superpower; however, per the National Priorities Project, “the United States still spends 54% of its GDP on its military, which translates into 598.5 billion dollars,” (National Priorities Project). The United States has 1,481 warheads, with 741 delivery vehicles, a mere 7 of these warheads could eliminate all life on the continent of Africa. The question then becomes why do we need so many of these weapons? The answer is we don’t. This paper will illustrate why the United States needs to eliminate these weapons and encourage others to do so as well.
The Tyranny of Numbers
Nuclear weapons are still the number one threat to human existence known to man. The United States and Russia …show more content…

The United States has had several accidents involving nuclear weapons and have lost so many nuclear weapons they had to develop a term for them, known as “Broken Arrows.” The air force accidentally dropped weapons near Atlantic City, New Jersey, Goldsboro, North Carolina, off the Okinawa coast, and even near Thule Air Base in Greenland. The state of the United States Nuclear Arsenal is so poor this crisis prompted former President Barrack Obama to ask for an additional 89 billion dollars to upgrade nuclear defense systems, per CNN. The U.S. military’s spending priorities are so out of order, per CNN “U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), which found that the Pentagon was still using 1970s-era computing systems that require "eight-inch floppy disks." Such disks were already becoming obsolete by the end of that decade, being edged out by smaller, non-floppy 3.5 to 5.25-inch disks, before being almost completely replaced by the CD in the late 90s. Except in Washington that is. The GAO report says that U.S. government departments spend upwards of $60 billion a year on operating and maintaining out-of-date technologies. That's three times the investment on modern IT systems,” (Griffiths, James).
If the problem is this bad then why do so many want build more nuclear …show more content…

The number 300 is not an arbitrary number I have picked out of the blue, it is a calculated, objective view on what could be done as well as affordably maintained by the taxpayer. The 300 warheads would give you an optimal mix of about 100 nuclear warheads at sea, 50 missiles silo’s, 50 mobile launch delivery systems or mobile land based systems, as well as 100 bombs available for deployment by air. The number 300 allows for a successful continuation of the nuclear triad and would create a much more manageable strategic situation for the United States. The second part of the solution has to be policy, the United States is the only country on earth who has used a nuclear weapon on another, furthermore it is the only country on earth who maintains “first strike,” which means the United States will not wait for an attack, it will attack first if it perceives an opponent might strike

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Russell-Einstein Manifesto

1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The 1945 Nuclear Bombs

155 Words | 1 Pages

During 1945 Nuclear Bombs became widely used throughout World War II so we have to prepare for this because it can happen any day. The first time we used a nuclear bomb was used in July 16, 1945 in New Mexico as a test. Then on August 16, 1945 the world changed when the United States attacked Japan with a nuclear bomb. Since nuclear bombs were invented by us, Russians also invented the dangerous weapon which would lead to the Cold War and us fearing about nuclear mass attacks. Everybody knows the most convenient way to be protected from nuclear bombings was by stop, drop, and tuck.

Read More

Should The United States Abolish Nuclear Weapons Dbq Essay

688 Words | 3 Pages

As said by Izhar Cohen, “the nuclear genie of how to make an an atomic bomb is out of the bottle, which means other nations or terrorists can obtain them and destabilize deterrence.” Izhar Cohen makes a point that the process of making an atomic bomb isn't a secret hence giving the U.S. another reason for them to keep their nuclear weapons. Because the process of making nuclear weapons is spreading, the U.S. needs to keep them for safety reasons. He also makes a point that terrorists could obtain them therefore making anyone without nuclear weapons an immediate target, giving the U.S. another reason to keep their nuclear

Read More

Compare And Contrast Lowther And Mcmahon

199 Words | 1 Pages

Blake Mcmahon and Adam Lowther look back to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, describe the destruction the bombing had caused, and acknowledge people’s concern regarding the danger of nuclear weapons. They counter the assumption of nuclear danger by asserting that if a country launch nuclear weapons it will spark deadly response from other nations. The nuclear characteristic of deterrent, they argued, is exemplified in the Cold War, in which the United States and the Soviet Union hindered themselves from the brink of war due to the horrific possibility of a nuclear war. Mcmahon and Lowther claim that nuclear weapons are still essential deterrents for the United States against countries that are developing nuclear weapons

Read More

Dr Strangelove Nuclear Weapons

1529 Words | 7 Pages

Nuclear weapons and the technology surrounding them have developed tremendously over the past fifty-sixty years. Many questions have risen since the beginning of the creation of nuclear weapons and whether or not nations should be trusted with these weapons. In this paper we are discussing whether or not the United States of America and the Soviet Union should be trusted with nuclear weapons. I think both the Unites States and the Soviet Union should be trusted with weapons of this caliber. There are a couple reasons why I think they both should be trusted.

Read More

Nuclear Weapons Be Shut Down By Eric Shlosser

1211 Words | 5 Pages

Nuclear weaponry and its uses are more relevant in today’s world than ever before. Nuclear technologies that are capable of creating mass destruction to both nations’ lands and civilians have become a commonly owned resource in almost every nation’s arsenal. The main issue surrounding nuclear weapons and perhaps the reason why none of these technologies have been used is due to the inevitable outcome of global ruin. The one and only nuclear attack to date was performed by the USA military on Japan which killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima and caused mass destruction that took several decades to recover from. One of the largest global controversies is whether or not nuclear weaponry should

Read More

Pros And Cons Of An Iranian Nuclear Weapon

626 Words | 3 Pages

A militant nation that does not fear its own destruction is a sure threat to its enemies and that threat is multiplied if the militant nation arms itself with nuclear weapons.

Read More

Duck And Cover Analysis

946 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear weapons are strong power, they do protect own nation and warn others nation. But if we don’t limit the power and control them appropriately, they may destroy us. Using great power that we couldn’t control, and caused unrecoverable damage is not just dangerous to our own nation, it is dangerous to

Read More

Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More

Tensions During The Cold War

1216 Words | 5 Pages

Winston Churchill, one of the most prominent British Prime Ministers of the 20th Century, once said, “If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is make the rubble bounce.” While this quote represents his thought on the matter, it also shows how present the Nuclear Arms Race was present in the minds of citizens in all areas. While the two superpowers during the Cold War were the United States and The Soviet Union, many citizens in neighboring countries were caught in the crossfire. The Arms Race was primarily between the Soviet Union and the United States. The most popularly produced weapon was, as seen in the quote, nuclear weapons.

Read More

North Korea Nuclear Weapons Pros And Cons

2021 Words | 9 Pages

Peace through strength has been the United States strategy since its foundation. For decades, the United States Military has been considered the strongest in the world. One of the reasons the United States is seen as a superpower is because of their nuclear weapon supply. But, since the Cold War, they have been working on depleting this supply. With countries like North Korea being active with nuclear weapons, the US needs to keep their nuclear weapons and even work on improving their own nuclear program.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Military Weapons

752 Words | 4 Pages

Military grade weapons are made for one reason and one reason only—to kill human beings. There is no reason for ordinary people to have access to this type of weaponry, especially semi-automatic rifles. More weapons, especially more semi-automatic weapons, does not mean less crime; semi-automatic weapons are not convenient for personal protection, and banning these weapons could help lower the number of mass shootings that occur in this country today. In 2016 alone, approximately 39,000 Americans were killed by guns, most of these deaths were caused by semi-automatic weapons (Lopez).

Read More

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

888 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, certainly no individual would halt this technology if he/she knew other countries were producing it. This ever growing fear of vulnerability to other countries is what confines the United States and the world to nuclear weaponry. Uncertain of other countries’ intents and missile arsenals, the United States believes that having these weapons protects its citizens from death. This sustained fear is a major contributor as to why nuclear weaponry remains so

Read More

Protest Against The Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament

862 Words | 4 Pages

Though while the United States are reducing the role of nuclear weapons in its national security, countries such as Russia, who has added 40 new intercontinental nuclear missiles to their arsenal, are increasing it. The presence of rogue nuclear powers such as North Korea and potentially Iran, and growing tensions between nuclear powers, as well as treaty violations, are making the need for nuclear disarmament has

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should Nuclear Weapons Be Banned?

1172 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons. Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of United States Nuclear Weapons

Related Topics

Open Document