Health care in America is not obtainable to every person, between price, availability and even lack of knowledge there are gaps. It is the American people that suffer, both those with coverage and those without alike. There are several aspects of health care economics that concern the public population. There are reforms that are designed to help, but there are still people that want no part of them. Universal health care coverage could be the solution to these problems that affect many of the United State 's population.
Universal Healthcare The term universal healthcare stands for any healthcare system that is managed by the government. It may cover programs such as government hospitals and other health facilities. Universal health care ensures that all the citizens can access preventive and rehabilitative healthcare services that they need. Government management in the system includes payment or subsidizing of medical services.
This system would be a customized plan to fit the citizen's needs. Healthcare is not the one size fits all system because of the diverse American families. Therefore, individuals deserve the value of care best set at what they think they need. The government can try and tell people what they think would be best, but only the people can decide on what is going to give them optimal care, depending on how much they are willing or unwilling to spend. A Universal health care's real goal is to cover every person, it does not protect the ninth amendment which gives people fundamental rights.
However, some might say that the benefits outweigh the odds as more people will be able to have better health care so it is benefiting humanity. But, Universal Healthcare should not happen. If Universal Healthcare happens, how would the government pay for it?
The current debate concerning the implementation of universal healthcare in America is hard to understand because it is comprised most of practical arguments of concern for the motives behind the project. Before one asks how much it will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, they should ask whether implementing universal healthcare is best for keeping with the values and principles of the American way. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
Universal Healthcare, a Right of Every Citizen Try for a second to fill the shoes of one of the 44.3 million Americans less than 65 years of age currently without any medical coverage (Department of Health & Human Services). These people are strained to live in a nation at the forefront of medical advance with several of the best hospitals and leading research institutes without being able to access any of the services they provide. Arguably the most vital and needed thing, health, certainly should not be taken lightly as someone’s life is often in jeopardy. So how can a country so progressive and sophisticated that has no trouble uniting to face wars, financial and natural catastrophes not supply medical coverage to its most imperative commodity,
Moreover, there are strong financial justifications for universal healthcare. Evidence demonstrates that universal healthcare can result in long-term cost savings for both individuals and the government, dispelling the myth that it is not financially viable. For example, compared to the United States, nations with universal healthcare systems frequently spend less per person on healthcare and get better health outcomes. America may achieve overall cost reduction and increased efficiency by promoting preventative care, negotiating cheaper drug prices, and streamlining administrative costs by implementing a universal healthcare model (Kahn & McDonough, 2018). III.
Kade Styron Professor Mosley English 1101 21 February 2023 Universal Healthcare: Is it For America? Universal health care in America may sound like a dream, but it would be a flawed system. Universal Health Care is a system in which everyone has equal access to free healthcare without discrimination. Currently, America has a mixed system of health care.
For many years, universal health care has been one of the most debated topics in the U.S., and several people disagree with bringing it about. Of course, we could go on and on about how and why we shouldn’t have a universal health care system, rather than why the U.S. should institute universal health care and why it would be beneficial. But what exactly is a universal health care system? It is defined as “Universal health coverage is defined as ensuring that all people have access to needed promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health services, of sufficient quality to be effective, while also ensuring that people do not suffer financial hardship when paying for these services.” by the World Health Organization, WHO.
Therefore, universal healthcare should be made available for every person regardless if they can afford it or not. Counterargument: P1: Universal healthcare would cause our taxes to go up.
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
First, it is important to understand what universal healthcare is. It can be defined in three parts: 1. All have access to healthcare, regardless of the ability to pay. 2. The quality of care received, should improve their health.
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
Universal health care is a valuable service and should be available in all countries. In many countries millions of people suffer from not having access to healthcare they deserve or not being able to pay for the healthcare they need. In the states alone, an estimated 50 million people do not have insurance because of the inability to pay for it. Universal health care would be beneficial to all countries because it would not exclude anyone from getting the necessary help, it would prevent the insurance companies from denying care, and it would contribute to preventative care to take place.
