Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Water privatization pros and cons
Water privatization pros and cons
Privatization of water issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Water privatization pros and cons
Water privatization pros and cons
Privatization of water issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
LCBO Privatization The Liquor Control Board of Ontario is a provincial crown corporation in Ontario, Canada that controls the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages in Ontario. It was established in nineteen-twenty-seven to sell liquor, wine and beer through a chain of retail stores. As of 2013 The Liquor Control Board of Ontario operates eight-hundred-fifty-three retail locations and has more than three-thousand-five-hundred employees. The privatization of the Liquor Control Board would mean to transfer the government owned business to the private sector with the objective of achieving greater economic efficiency and government revenues.
The key is raising efficiency and lowering the overhead cost of service not privatization. Today the Canadian government like many governments is hesitant to raise taxes or add to their already large debt burdens with new financial projects. The selling of crown corporations is an easy and viable solution to help relief some of the short-term debt. The government is continually trying to lower capital and operating costs by handing off crown corporations as they did with Air Canada. Three forces that have made privatization more common in Canada in recent years are greater foreign investment, globalization and reorganizing and managing organizations.
What is privatization? How does it work? Why do we have it? These are a few questions that are running through the minds of millions of Canadians every day. There are many current issues and debates based around the topic of privatization going on with small businesses, large businesses and most importantly the government.
Imagine having to pay for water to shower, drink, wash your hands with etc. Bolivia was a country that was subjected to the privatization of water and they responded negatively. The citizens of Bolivia weren't avid about handing their fresh clean drinking water over to foreign corporations. “On January 10 the citizens of El Alto took to the streets en masse to demand that their water system, privatized in 1997 under World Bank pressure, be returned to public hands.” Three days later the president cancelled the water concession.
I believe we have a far bigger crisis on our hands as it relates to hydro rates for all sectors. The ever-increasing hydro rates are causing increased detriment, for all. Property taxation is the fundamental component of most municipal budgets throughout the world, is 5000 years old and remains problematic. The current form of property assessment/taxation is based on a four year system. Despite property being assessed higher, municipalities have to wait 4 years (phase-in) to generate the market value tax base.
The movement toward privatization began in the 1980s and has grown at a rapid pace. By 2009, privately operated correctional facilities serving as prisons and jails held over 128,000 state and federal prisons across 33 states. State run prison systems have always contracted with private industries for food, psychological testing, training and recreational services. Companies such as Cornell Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America, Correctional Services Corporation, Wackenhunt Corrections Corporations and several other smaller companies operates private prisons. Most states corrections administrators utilize private companies to reduce overcrowding, lower operating expenses, and avoid lawsuits aimed at state officials and employees.
putting the security of these civilians a risk, defeats the whole purpose of social security, which is why the privatization of Social Security would be foolish. A major risk of privatization is that the transition from a “pay as you go” system to a fully funded system would be very difficult to manage, for many reasons. Currently, the taxes paid by each generation of workers fund the retirement benefits of the previous generation of workers. While each generation of workers has been confident that its retirement would be financed by the next, this confidence is eroding (Pollard 1).
This article acts as a continuation of the research done by the author while conducting fieldwork in South Africa pertaining to the ways that water privatization has affected poor, South African women. The piece examines the transition from the apartheid regime to the election of the African National Congress (ANC) in 1994. Women and girls living in poverty are intimately linked to water, as the article notes, and this relationship is explored as the author considers the ways in which privatization has impacted their lives physically, mentally, and emotionally. The article allows the reader to examine the role that international institutions, such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization, played in South
First, privatization arrangements generally create multiple levels of principal-agent relationships. This makes it impossible for government to monitor all agents. No matter how much monitoring a principal does, some
“The question of water ownership has been debated since at least ancient Rome, and today, some 2,000 years later, government, big business and Earth’s 7.125 billion (Google) and growing inhabitants are no closer to a consensus on who owns the tiny percentage of drinkable water on the planet”(ECORI). According to the Journal of Water Resources Management, private ownership of water utilities has been growing worldwide at alarming rates. “Most Americans are served by publicly owned water and sewer utilities. Eleven percent of Americans receive water from private (so-called "investor-owned") utilities. In rural areas, cooperatives often provide drinking water.
The name of the group I attended was the two for one group at the Suburban Club. The Suburban Club is located at 2002 East Main Street, Chattanooga, TN 37404. I attend this open discussion meeting on February 3 with Alison and Emily; the meeting time was 5:30 PM. The meeting demographic was diverse. The socioeconomic status of the group appeared to range from poor/working class to middle/business class.
Despite the benefits, they are outweighed by the disadvantages due to the socio-economic and environmental aspects. Although proponents argue that desalination could solve the water crisis, critics claim that there are many alternative strategies that are more effective. In light of this, it is recommended that governments should shift to water recycling and rain water tanks to generate fresh water. Failure to implement this may lead to detrimental economic consequences for the
Water privatization can foster corruption and result in rate hikes inadequate customer service and loss of local control and accountability. Williams, M. (2007). PRIVATIZATION AND THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER: CHALLENGES FOR THE NEW CENTURY. Michigan Journal of International Law, 28(2), 469-505.
Sometimes, to solve the problem of water pollution developing countries and the World Bank decide to privatization is the private sector that provides water and sanitation to the people. The article, “Food Water Watch,” reports that “Around the world, multinational corporations are seizing control of public water resources and prioritizing profits for their stockholders and executives over the needs of the communities they serve.” This shows that water privatization is global, it is not done by one nation only but most countries privatize water. Water privatization is a subject of great debate, there are people who oppose and others who support it.
The political, religious conflicts between Israel and Palestine have lasted for fifty years. However, it does not seem close to end at all. As time goes on, Israel begins to take an advantage of their wealth, international reputation, military strengths over Palestinians to claim areas near Jerusalem as their homeland. In the article “How Israel privatized its occupation of Palestine,” Antony Loewenstein and Matt Kennard express that what various factors that promote the problems of privatization over Palestinians. To prove their arguments persuasive, the authors depict their point of views on privatization of Israel with supporting political, social, and economical facts, evidences, and statistics.