ipl-logo

Pros And Cons: The Assimilation Of Native Americans

755 Words4 Pages

Assimilation: assimilation is a noun that means the process of absorbing one cultural group into another. Whether you 're talking about ideas or nutrients, assimilation describes the act of taking something in and absorbing it fully. This is exactly what the Natives had to do to be able to survive through their harshest move, their biggest challenges, and the disappointments that changed their lives. The Natives had it ruff and in most cases the Americans weren 't fair to the Natives, the Americans could of acted differently towards the Natives so they wouldn’t feel so threatened by the Americans.
The Natives had a huge challenge to face, an illegal treaty robbing them of their rights and possessions. In the Cherokee letter protesting the treaty of New Echota says "A spurious Delegation, in violation of a special injunction of the general council of the nation, proceeded to Washing City with this pretended treaty, and by false and fraudulent representations supplanted on the favor of the Government the legal and accredited Delegation of the Cherokee people, and obtained for this instrument, after making important alterations in its provisions, the recognition of the United States Government." Even though the treaty was illegal and fake they still brought it up to the US Gov. to make it legal even after the Americans were making the Natives follow it. Also in Gen. Winfield Scott 's Address to the Cherokee …show more content…

The harshest movement for the Natives was when thousands of their people died because of the US. In the A solider recalls the Trail of Tears says “I saw the helpless Cherokees arrested and dragged from their homes, and driven at the bayonet point into the stockades.” The Cherokees couldn’t defend themselves unless they were willing to die while fighting for freedom. Also it says “The Trail of the exiles was a trail of death” The Cherokees weren’t treated right, they weren’t cared for when sick and because of that thousands of Cherokee people died while being

Show More
Related
719 Words | 3 Pages

John Ross a Cherokee Indian Chief John Ross was born on October 3, 1790 in Turkeytown, Alabama near present day Center, Alabama. He was born to a Scottish/Indian mother, and a Scottish father. Though, he was only 1/8 Cherokee Indian (on mothers side.) His mother and grandmother raised him according to Cherokee traditions. He enjoyed wearing Cherokee traditional clothing when he was a child and a young man, but as he got older, he dressed like a white man.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Settlers were against any treaties that didn’t include either the “extermination of the Seminoles or the relocation of all surviving Indians to the west. Any attempts by the army officers to make peace that would allow the Seminoles to remain in Florida was opposed by settlers and whenever possible they attempted to persuade Congress to accept nothing less than relocation. This is shown by the memorial the citizens of St John sent to Congress in 1841. They sent the message as a response to rumors of a treaty with the Seminoles which would allow the Seminoles to keep living in Florida. The settlers made it clear that they were against the treaty.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Jackson supported the white men who wanted to see this plan through, because the Indians land was very valuable. They felt they had a legal right to their land, so the Cherokee Indians took Andrew Jackson to court. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. Even though the Supreme court had ruled that the Cherokees had a legal right to stay on their land in Worcester v. Georgia, but Jackson still forced them out of their land. The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully, which Jackson did not even attempt to

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a time where there were lots of contradictions. Meanwhile It was a period of land hungry Americans who wanted to expand land democratic institutions which unfolded the limitations of democracy. The states put an end to property restrictions and due to the Louisiana purchase of1812 the American's saw more opportunities to start expanding and settling in towards the west, but was all destroyed for the native Americans who lived that way. No one knew the way the democracy worked at this age better than the Cherokees, who embraced their lifestyle and culture only to be mistreated and misunderstood when sent to be moved forcibly against their will from their home land and move to the east. In this document I will

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Major Ridge Throughout the course of history we have come across people who’ve had an impact on the type of lives we live today, some important historical figures that have been remembered till this day and others who have been forgotten. Nonetheless, these people have altered our history, and their future. One example of these historical figures is Major Ridge. Major Ridge was seen as a Hero because of his heroic leadership such as in The Battle of Horseshoe Bend, but unlike any imperfect human in the world he had his bad moments such as, his betrayal to his people which lead to the Trail of Tears.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

In 1830, the Indian Removal Act was signed, forcing the Indians to move west of the Mississippi River. 4,000 of the 15,000 Cherokees died along the trail of tears, meaning over 25% of the Cherokees died. Although they did not want to leave their land, they had to because of President Jackson. The Indians should not have been forced off their land. President Jackson did not treat the Indians fairly, the land belonged to the Indians, and the Indians rights were being violated.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

The Cherokee tribe say if they stay that the laws they would have to live under would ruin the Cherokee people. In the text written by the Cherokee they say, “even though we love the land of our fathers, we believe that moving will be far better than giving into the laws of the states. If we stay we will witness the ruin of the Cherokee people.” this means that even though the Cherokee loved their land they would rather leave than stay and be under the laws of the United States. The Cherokee nation cannot be re-established in the middle of the white men.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

The only course they had was to take the United States to court and Andrew Jackson. Presidents of the United States negotiated treaties with Native Americans to take their land and move them west. Andrew Jackson was no different to make treaties but he was different because of his track record. However, “...violation of the rights of Native Americans had begun even earlier…the first Europeans arrived in North America.” He did not follow the crowd and made decisions on his own that would benefit the United States and society as a whole.

Read More
1899 Words | 8 Pages

This created conflict with the tribes who didn’t sign, as well as the ones who did, because they were angered at how frequently the treaty promises were ignored (Aaseng, 1992). Violence escalated when General James Carleton ordered Colonel Kit Carson into Navajo land with brutal instructions: Force the Navajo into the stark choice of surrender or starvation (Aaseng, 1992). The fortune-seekers proceeded to destroy everything the Navajo had, forcing them to surrender and go on a 300-mile trek to Fort Sumner in eastern New Mexico (Aaseng, 1992). The Navajos had no idea where they were

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

The Cherokee had been living on the land far longer than the settlers had arrived. They built their own land and made a whole society. The Cherokee were healthy and they had all the buffalo they needed and they had herbs. Only a handful of the Cherokee leaders signed the treaty and the Supreme Court even said they could stay. It is wrong to push people out of their own home when they did nothing wrong.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

With the arrival of Anglo-Americans, Native Americans lost much more than just their land. Tribes were forced onto reservations, stripped of their culture, wealth and place in society, with no hope of regaining what they owned unless by complete assimilation. For the latter half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, many Anglo-Americans continually pushed for Native Americans to abandon their cultures and “savage” ways. However, despite the many attempts to force Natives into Anglo-American culture, many Native Americans found ways to negotiate with the demands of the Anglo-Americans through mainly social, economic and legal means.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

1st- Within this excerpt from Kepler’s work called New Astronomy, he describes how the belief that the Earth rotates around the Sun does not contradict the Scripture of God. In order to claim this premise, he builds this idea on a series of arguments and explanations. Kepler first argument elaborates on the idea that people in society produce most of their supporting evidence for their interpretation of the Bible through the use of senses, specifically that of sight. He argues that empirical observations cannot always support their interpretations of the Scripture because there is much that society cannot accurately describe just using their sense of sight. Kepler uses this argument to show that society should not always trust its observations and that even though there is no observed feelings of wind or vibrations, society should not claim that this absence of observed phenomenon supports their interpretation of the Bible that there is a geocentric universe.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Before the word integration came into existence, what existed was assimilation. Assimilation is an unreasonable course of action, in which immigrants and their offspring give up their culture and become accustomed wholly to the society they have migrated in to. The policy of assimilation occurred in the United States where by, the foremost cultural group called WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) forcefully made others immigrants to adopt the language, culture, and social structure of the American people, restricting them from using their own cultural artifacts. Another example was in the French policy of assimilation in her colonies in West Africa like Senegal during the late sixteenth century. The French colonial masters made them to work and think like French men.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons: The Assimilation Of Native Americans

Related Topics

Open Document