Is a hereditary monarchy compatible with the principle of democracy? Should Britain get rid of the monarchy and establish a republic? Hereditary Monarchy is the most dominant form among the surviving monarchies. It has the advantages like continuity of the concentration of power and wealth and predictions of who controls the means of governance and preferential treatment. The monarch should have the necessary skills, and maintains an appropriate royal dignity and pledge loyalty to the royal family. The main disadvantage is the heir apparent may be physically or unfit to rule. Other disadvantages of a hereditary monarch are the inability of people to choose their head of state, the petrified distribution of wealth and power across a broad spectrum of society, and the continuation of old fashion religious and socio-economic …show more content…
The claimants are hungry for the throne. In most current monarchies, the typical procedure of succession is based on transfer of powers to first born child to be known as primogeniture, but there exist other methods such as seniority, which were more common in the past. Patrilineal succession refers to systems where females are not allowed to succeed or to transfer succession rights to their male descendants. An agnate is a kinsman, an unbroken male line. Cognatic succession referred to any succession which allowed both genders to be heirs, although in modern era it specifically refers to succession by seniority regardless of sex. The religious association of the candidate or his wife effects, where the monarch has a religious responsibility or title. The British monarch has the title of Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Since 20th century the powers of Monarch are transferred to the