ipl-logo

Rafael Nadal Supreme Court Cases

499 Words2 Pages

Tennis star Rafael Nadal is suing former French minister for health and sport, Roselyn Bachelot, for defamation, after Bachelot accused Nadal of taking performance enhancing drugs on the French television talk show Le Grand 8. Nadal did not play tennis for seven months in 2012 due to multiple tennis-related injuries. According to Bachelot, the “real” reason for Nada’s absence was, “Probably due to a positive doping test” (The Associated Press). Nadal is suing Bachelot for defamation because he believed that Bachelot’s words would damage his image as one of the best tennis players in the world. Nadal is the petitioner in the case while Bachelot is the respondent. In other words, Nadal is the individual bringing a lawsuit upon Bachelot, and Bachelot is the individual defending her statement. The key issue at state in this case is libel because Nadal believes that Bachelot’s statement was false and defamatory to his character. …show more content…

In New York Times v. Sullivan, it was determined that public citizens had to prove actual malice when suing another individual for libel. Since Nadal is a popular athlete, he could be deemed as a public citizen. In order to determine exactly what type of public citizen that Nadal is, the Supreme Court case Gertz v. Robert Welch has the answer. This case determined that there are three types of public figures: all purpose, limited purpose, and involuntary. Since Nadal is well known in the world around him, then he could be classified as an all purposes public figure. Therefore, in order for Nadal to prove that he was libeled, he would have to prove that there was actual malicious intent on behalf of the accused. If he was a private citizen, then all he would have to prove would be negligence on behalf of the alleged

Show More
Related
308 Words | 2 Pages

Blake Shelton has sued a tabloid for defamation. On Monday, Blake Shelton has officially filed a lawsuit against the tabloid magazine, In Touch Weekly, over its released article in Late September. It claimed that the country singer had a drinking problem that contributed to his divorce from ex-wife, Miranda Lambert and that he was headed for rehab, AP reported. The defamation lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court and Shelton is said to be seeking more than $1 million for the damages.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

In the case McCann v. The Ottawa Sun, 1993 CanLII 5507 (ON SC), the General Division of the Ontario Court was correct when stating the published words by The Ottawa Sun were insufficient to carry the Mayor of Pembroke’s action of defamation. At the same time, the columnist’s comments can be considered a humorous remark, which is a prove individuals in Canada have freedom of speech, which is the ability to communicate ideas without the interference of the state. To establish a cause of action for defamation, the plaintiff must prove: the statement published was defamatory, meaning the words bring the person’s reputation into hatred, contempt or ridicule; the words, in fact, referred to the plaintiff and finally, the words have been published, meaning somebody – other than the plaintiff – had access to the statement. In 1993, the Mayor of Pembroke, Terance McCann, claimed damages for libel against The Ottawa Sun

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Josh Powell was a person of interest in the disappearance of his wife Susan Powell in 2009; despite of disappearance Josh was never charged. Josh at that point in time had custody of two boys Charlie and Braden. Josh’s father Steven Powell also lived with josh and the two boys. (Comb, 2012) On December 7th, 2009 Josh and Susan failed to drop the kids off at daycare in Utah and Susan herself failed to show up to work that morning.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

II. The Cases of Jamie Melendez and Christopher Mirasolo A) Course of Events In 2009, a man named Jaime Melendez (nineteen at that time) raped a fourteen year old high school student, who is mentioned as H.T. in court documents, several times in the victim’s house in Massachusetts. The victim has conceived a child in one of these horrifying incidents and gave birth to a baby girl in 2010. After entering a guilty plea in 2011 and sentenced to sixteen years probation, Thomas Mcguire (Norfolk Superior Court Judge) ruled Melendez to go to the family court, which ordered Melendez to pay the mother an estimated 110 dolars for child support on a weekly basis.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Where is the harm in this case? Although the judicial assistant was wrong to be discussing the case with his friend especially in a public place. 2. Could Cartwright successfully sue Judge Barnes for libel? If Judge Barnes made the comments in the elevator to Mack Jones, her assistant that Cartwright lied about not shoplifting, and Cartwright can prove he did not steal, then yes.

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Before and during the case he would tell lie after lie which did not make him a credible source (Route

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

The nation has significantly improved throughout history, in the years 1857-1954, three main supreme court cases had changed the perspectives of others by giving them a different view of things. Civil liberties, mostly deal with regard to freedom of action and speech which hasn’t always been fair to African-Americans, in history, they have been treated unfairly just due to the color of their skin. They have been segregated primarily throughout history, not having the equal about of civil rights as White-American people. However, the supreme court cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Brown v. Board affected the role of African-Americans and how they weren’t able to own land, sit wherever they would like to sit on a railway

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout chapters ten and eleven of Introduction to the Philosophy of Sport, Heather L. Reid addresses the many issues that arise between the relationship between virtues and sports. In particular, Reid states, “It is characteristic of sport that we want to know not just who won but also whether they deserved to win” (Reid, 140). The emphasis on the “deserving” to win closely ties with ethics, assuming that only virtuous people “deserve” to win. What grabbed my attention even more was Reid’s next statement regarding immoral actions that occur outside of the arena of sport: “The detection and punishment of cheaters is (at least presented as) a priority, and even immoral actions that have nothing to do with sport can tarnish an athlete’s image and detract from his or her results” (Reid, 140). I agree with Reid’s proposal that an athlete’s reputation can easily be affected by actions irrelevant to his or his sport.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Later the Justice Department issued him a letter clearing him of all chargers. Finally, he sued all the media and newspapers that had implied accusations. The reporter that reports defamation must be accountable for destroying someone’s life. Defamation by implication "situations where all factual statements in a news story are probably true, but the overall gist of the story is false” (Hindman, 2007).

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

John Marshall was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court reigning from 1782 to his death in 1835. He is considered to be the person who brought the Supreme Court into its role today in the Federal Government. He had a long history in Law and also served in the Revolutionary War. Marshall led what most believe to be the most influential Supreme Court cases for federal power (Biography, 2015).

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Billie’s life became filled with training, she would listen to any coach that might know anything about Bobby’s tactic. The other demand on her time was interviews lots and lots of interviews. During an Interview Billie said,” I told them I never thought women were better than men, and that the top man in tennis would beat the top woman. I was playing to prove that men and women had the same entertainment value, which is why we should be paid equally” (King 26). That was not what the press wanted to hear, so it all got swept under the rug.

Read More
384 Words | 2 Pages

Burnett (plaintiff) argued that the National Enquirer’s (defendant) article was utterly false and libelous. In return, the jury presented Burnett with $300,000 in compensatory damages and $1.3 million in punitive damages. The trial court

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

The first major court case to influence our treatment of juveniles today was the Kent v. United States. The case overall, made an impact on the treatment of juveniles today because now juveniles have a right to an attorney, the parents must be notified and either parents or a lawyer must be present during an interrogation, and juveniles must be reminded of his or her right to silence. The main thing that this case influenced was that courts must allow juveniles the right to defend themselves and to be heard when transferring a juvenile over to the adult system. A second major court case was In re Gault.

Read More
1503 Words | 7 Pages

But this applies to only those who resort to cheating ways. Sports persons always hit the headlines for a lot of controversies like using drugs, playing for two clubs, abusing the fans of other countries or clubs or inappropriate behaviour in the field or breaking the code of conduct and so on and so forth. The problem does not stop here; the sports medicine which the players take is also causing serious debates and discussion. Issues like faking injury, losing intentionally to get a stronger opponent and failing the gender test had also surfaced in the

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Abortion legalization We can do whatever we want with our body, it is our property. What government can do about this is to suggest, not to suppress. However, more than 300,000 females around the world are carrying a rapist’s child, due to formidable pressure from the government’s authorities. Why should the government care about our body?

Read More

More about Rafael Nadal Supreme Court Cases

Related Topics

Open Document