ipl-logo

Rainsford's 'Guilty In The Most Dangerous Game'

650 Words3 Pages

“The Most Dangerous Game” is a story that gets you thinking whether or not to kill or be killed, or as Rainsford says, “The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees.” That's not all though,“The Most Dangerous Game” has another question that gets you thinking, is Sanger Rainsford guilty, or not guilty? But in the end all evidence points that he is guilty of murder. For he wanted to get off the island, his view on things changed, and in the end when Rainsford was sleeping in the bed.

One of the first pieces of evidence that makes Rainsford guilty was that he wanted to get off the island. When the general started to talk about hunting people during dinner Rainsford didn’t like it and didn’t want anything to do with the …show more content…

At first he didn’t want to play the game, “Thank you, i’m a hunter, not a murder”, but in the end he did try. An example was that he tried to set the traps for the general. Rainsford dug a hole with sharpened stakes in the bottom that was intended for the general to fall in, “ He knew his pursuer was coming;.... Then he felt an impulse to cry aloud with joy, for he heard the sharp crackle of the breaking branches as the cover of the pit gave way; he heard the sharp scream of pain as the pointed stakes found their mark.” Rainsford also made another trap that could have killed the general, but which instead killed Ivan. “General Zaroff was still on his feet. But Ivan was not. The knife, driven by the recoil of the springing tree, had not wholly failed.” Another example is was that Rainsford decided to go back to the house instead of taking the chance to leave the island after escaping from the general which was what he wanted in the first place.

Lastly, in the end it was mentioned that Rainsford was sleeping in the bed that was for the one who didn’t end up with the dogs. “One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed.” Rainsford would have had to kill the general if he wanted to survive. “He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided.” Rainsford couldn’t have slept in the bed if the general was still alive, so Rainsford killed the

Show More
Related

Brief Summary Of Rainsford's Life On An Island

736 Words | 3 Pages

Rainsford knows just where to find a body sized bag, he grabs it fast and places General’s body in the bag. First he thinks to himself, does this mean I am a murderer too? No I was helping out the others by doing this. I am a good murderer.

Read More

Analysis Of Most Dangerous Game By Dwight Moody

298 Words | 2 Pages

This means that the General is talking about hunting men, because no animal can reason but man-kind. Rainsford then

Read More

Summary Of Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

572 Words | 3 Pages

In this palace he was confronted by a giant named Ivan. Then he met general Zaroff and found out that he hunted humans. General Zaroff gave Rainsford options to either hunt with him, to play his game and be hunted, or to deal with Ivan. Rainsford decided to play his game and got 3 days to play. Zaroff gave him 3 hours before he started hunting him.

Read More

Control Of Emotions In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

370 Words | 2 Pages

In the short story The Most Dangerous Game, the author Richard Connell shows that Rainsford needs control of his emotions, patience , and expert hunting and decision making skills in order to defeat Zaroff. Rainsford needs to gain control of his emotions to outthink Zaroff, who symbolizes Rainsfords "steep hill". When he finds that he is going to be hunted his natural instinct is to run and panic, but then he stops to look around and get a grip on the task at hand. Then at a critical moment when Zaroff finds him in a tree, Rainsford panics again because he realizes Zaroff is on his trail and is toying with him. Once again, he gains control of his emotions and formulates a plan.

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Rhetorical Analysis

364 Words | 2 Pages

If I find him, the general smiled, he loses” (Connell 5). In this section of the story, Zaroff is explaining the rules of the game to Rainsford. When Zaroff says “If I find him….. he loses,” you can highly infer by this that when he says “loses” he means they die, so he’s practically saying that is Rainsford loses, he dies. Typically, when one knows they are going to die, they do what they can to save themselves, which is what Rainsford did.

Read More

Rainsford In George Orwell's The Most Dangerous Game

600 Words | 3 Pages

Hunting is a game where you can have fun killing a certain type of animal, but could be very dangerous at the same time. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford is a character that is a very good hunter. So one day him and his buddy's went out on a yacht and went out on the sea to go to the caribbean to look for this island to hunt Jaguars. But while on a yacht he feel of the boat and fell into the sea. Moving on he was on this Island and met this General.

Read More

Good Vs. Evil In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

157 Words | 1 Pages

In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” , Rainsford is the positive force in a classic good vs. evil showdown against a psychopathic man-hunter. For example, Rainsford non - evilness is displayed when he declines General Zaroff’s “ We will hunt - you and I,” (10). This is substantial evidence towards Rainsford morals and integrity as a human. Based on the short story, a good and decent person would not want to hunt someone, it is an act of cold blood.

Read More

Lawrence Wargrave: The Murder Of U. N. Owen

496 Words | 2 Pages

Out of all of the suspects that could possibly be U.N. Owen, I believe that Lawrence Wargrave is the only one that could possibly be the suspected murderer. The evidence was made quite obvious at the beginning, when he was the only one in the first-class smoking carriage. Tickets for that train car must have been awfully expensive, so a person could only buy a ticket for that train car if they had the money. So, since he is the only one in this car of the train, he must have a large sum of money compared to the other characters in the book. Soldier island is a ravishing mansion that would cost a fortune to own.

Read More

Justice Wargrave Analysis

584 Words | 3 Pages

In the Epilogue two police officers, Inspector Maine and Sir Thomas Legge, investigate the death of ten people on an island. Inspector Maine then tells us that Isaac Morris had bought the Island and made all the arrangements for Mr. Morris. They then tells us the Isaac Morris has died from an overdose of sleeping pills on August 8. The two then tells us that the people of Sticklehaven were told to ignore the island for a week because of an experiment. The epilogue then turns its attention to a manuscript written by Justice Wargrave.

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Mood Analysis

436 Words | 2 Pages

Finally, when Rainsford has learned of the general’s “game” and his current setting creates a sense of helplessness or powerlessness. The night before he is hunted, Rainsford states, “Once he thought he heard stealthy steps in the corridor outside his room. He sought to throw open the door; it would not open. He went to the window and looked

Read More

Sanger Rainsford Character Analysis

624 Words | 3 Pages

Although, now it seems that Rainsford has adopted General Zaroff's cold attitude toward killing humans, so if Rainsford has changed, it was not to a better person but to a worse. From first no sympathy for animals to no sympathy for men. One way it seems that way is he kills Ivan with no pang of guilt. Some might say that's not murder that's just self-defense. But if that's the case then why does Rainsford after claiming victory and safety from death go to Zaroff's room at night and kills him.

Read More

Social Criticism In 'And Then There Were None'

769 Words | 4 Pages

ATTWN Essay Throughout the novel “And Then There Were None”, the roles of the philosophy, the setting, as well as the separation of the distinct social classes maintain consistent prominence in effecting the upshot of the novel. This occurs primarily by aiding Justice Wargrave in his murders, and secondarily by exonerating him from the blame of the crimes. The novel takes place in 1940s Britain, where typical philosophy was radically different that in the contemporary time.

Read More

Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis

662 Words | 3 Pages

Rainsford has no way to live unless he kills General Zaroff because Zaroff would most likely continue to force Rainsford to

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Conflict Analysis

460 Words | 2 Pages

He had to fight himself to stay on track. He was so scared in the jungle while the General was trying to hunt him. On page 186, it says “He could not say where he was. That was suicide.” This shows the reader that Rainsford may be thinking of what could go wrong, and is not thinking on the positive side of things.

Read More

Agatha Christie And Then There Were None Analysis

1140 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Agatha Christie was born Agatha Mary Clarissa Miller on September 5, 1890, in Torquay, England. In 1914 she married Colonel Archibald Christie, an aviator in the Royal Flying Corps. They had a daughter, Rosalind, and divorced in 1928. By that time, Christie had begun writing mystery stories, initially in response to a dare from her sister. Her first novel, The Mysterious Affair at Styles, was published in 1920 and featured the debut of one of her most famous characters, the Belgian sleuth Hercule Poirot.

Read More

More about Rainsford's 'Guilty In The Most Dangerous Game'

Related Topics

Open Document