In “Grades and Self-Esteem” Randy Moore believes that edifiers should fixate on grading students’ level of inculcation instead on fixating on their self-esteem. I believe self-esteem comes by nature and confidence, but grading comes by only learning what you are taught. For Moore, self-esteem can be earned. Moore argues that “self-esteem is earned and that schools, despite their good intentions, cannot dispense it as a packaged handout” (pp.119). Through grading Moore argues that students can evaluate their scholastic level and they can work strenuously on themselves. He additionally shows us some comparison between American students and Korean and how lowering standard affected American students future’s job and their professional lives, while the Korean high standard level ranked first in math that open incipient opportunity for a better job. I concur with him because lowering standard can affect the students’ edifying level, because lowering standard reduces students’ motivation toward strenuous exertion. My opinion is standard should not be lowered because earning what you are not deserve can cause for learning anything. Moore verbally expresses some edifiers to evade feeling …show more content…
I cerebrate edifiers should guide the students to better future. The students don’t feel it how lamentable it is when relay on self-esteem as bulwark. In Somalia the edifiers are different the way they edify sometimes they don’t care if the students understand or gain something. But when it comes to exam they don’t pass if students the students pass exam. There is no any self-esteem to relay on when it comes to