ipl-logo

Is Realism A Realistic Approach For Understanding Contemporary Global Politics

1691 Words7 Pages

Is Realism a realistic approach for understanding contemporary global politics?
Introduction
Realism is a political theory amongst many others, and is a paradigm that goes far back as one of the oldest in International Relations (IR) as well as International Political Economy (IPE). It is a hub of ideas based on different principles about what determines state behavior towards the other. In the discipline of IR there are general theories/theoretical perspectives. Realism is also known as political realism where the international politics stresses and emphasizes its competitive and inner-conflicted sides. The founding fathers of classical realism are Thucydides, Machiavelli and Hobbes. However, today the classical realism is renamed to neo-realism. …show more content…

He questioned if rivalry states, where power is the most essential, also can be led by norms of justice. In his book History of the Peloponnesian War, (Finley, 1972), he wrote about how people from opposing sides faced each other concerning an issue.
The basic starting point with classical political realism is human nature whereas realists look at human beings as egoistic and self-interested to the point where it overshadows the moral principles.
Neorealist, the realism of today, acknowledge the state of not being present (anarchy) as the basics cause of political outcome. The deficiency of laws and authority channels arguments and disputes where the international arena turns to a self-help system. When this situation happens, each state is accountable for its own survival as well as determines its interests and chase power. As Thucydides mentioned it “the independent states survive only when they are powerful”. (Thucydides, 1972). Since realists look at the states as anarchic, they believe security is a main issue. To attain that security, they balance the power in order to stop the enemies. When talking about realists, they believe that when it comes to international relations there is no room for morality in that aspect. Instead there is a pressure between demands of morality and requirements of profitable political …show more content…

(Malcolm, 2002, p.442). Hobbes argues that without an authority in the international system, the outcome from cooperation between states and individuals can bring peace and security. In political realism, there is no such thing whereas states can form successful alliances because states cannot be trusted hence to the states view of ‘self-interest’ and therefore not care of any other state in the system but itself. Thucydides views on this is similar while Hobbes believes that all states are equal and therefore it is possible to “create more stable forms of coexistence among themselves” (Williams, 1996), and achieve peace and

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of US Intervention In The United States

690 Words | 3 Pages

The issue with realpolitik is that it lacks moral thinking when it comes to solving an issue. For example North Korea is an example of being able to use both ways of thinking. An idealistic approach would mean the United states would do everything it can to protect its allies. A realpolitik approach would result in the United States encouraging China to deal with the issue themselves(Johnson

Read More

Ap English Literature Realism Essay

1045 Words | 5 Pages

Realism was first born as a reaction of romanticism; as the realist movement spawned from naturalism and regionalism. Realism is the products of a changing society in the United States due to the Industrial Revolution and Era of Good Feelings. One may think, realism is most important in literature since it presents life honestly, objectively

Read More

Comparing Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

1148 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke thought very differently during this time. Thomas Hobbes based his theories on government on his belief that man was basically greedy, selfish, and cruel. John Locke based his theories on his assessment of human nature or God. Locke believed that people could be reasonable and moral.

Read More

Star Trek Balance Of Terror Analysis

989 Words | 4 Pages

Interestingly, Captain Kirk displayed examples of liberalism and realism simultaneously. It is these actions of the two warring enemies in which the conflict begins and appropriately ends. To move on, the theories of realism and liberalism must be expounded upon. Realism, as a theory, deals with how the world is perceived, and it predominantly focuses on the true nature of man. The state of the world is anarchy according to this theory.

Read More

The Peloponnesian Civil War: An Analysis

1010 Words | 5 Pages

Thucydides was an Athenian historian that wrote The History of the Peloponnesian War. His account of the conflict is considered a classic and is one of the earliest works of history. When analyzing his work, there are multiple ways to view it. It can be looked at as an objective piece of history that attempts to record the events that unfolded. But it can also be seen as a piece of literature that tries to tell a story and evoke emotion through symbolism rather than be a historical recording.

Read More

Realist Approach To Military Security

2260 Words | 10 Pages

As the realist school of thought suggested, each state has one agenda, to survive and will therefore go through any means necessary to ensure this. However there will always be others who believe there is more to human nature and more to state agenda than realism allows for. In conclusion, realism has dominated the study of security significantly and in turn has dominated the concept of military security. Realism in relation to military security will continue to dominate as its fundamentals encompass what military security is all about. It may have flaws and weaknesses, it may be deemed regressive in some aspects by critics but it reflects accurately in essence what military security is and what it aims to achieve.

Read More

Realism Vs. Liberalism In International Relations

902 Words | 4 Pages

The theory unleashes such dynamic forces that from the time of its inception up till now it has governed the international system of the world however things one day itself fall apart. The Realists mark the State as the locus of different international circles and these sovereign states have vested interests which are always selfish. Realism is a heartless theory, man is not supposed to be selfish in the way exaggerated by the Realist thinker however [he] is a seeker of knowledge and what so ever he stumbles upon, he keeps

Read More

Examples Of Realism In The Gulf War

1312 Words | 6 Pages

Realist Perspective of the War: According to realists, the International Political system is anarchical. There is no sovereign entity ruling above the sovereign states in the world. Whilst this anarchy needs not to be chaotic, for various member states of the international

Read More

Realism, Constructivism And Post-Structuralism

958 Words | 4 Pages

4.0 An Explanation of Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Post-Structuralism. 4.1 Realism Realism or political realism prioritizes national interests and security concerns in addition to moral ideology and social reconstruction. The term is often associated with political power. The term is often associated with political power. Realism believes that the state is the main actor of the most important in determining the direction of a country.

Read More

Security Realism

1267 Words | 6 Pages

(Axworthy, 2001). There is no all-encompassing, succinct, conclusive definition of security as while scholars of International Relations recognize its existence on the agenda of states they are unable to agree as to what its definition should be. Various theoretical paradigms present varying arguments for the definition of security, who it

Read More

Realism Theory In The Israel And Palestine Conflict

1316 Words | 6 Pages

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK It involves using theories to explain the existing problem in various situations. Realism theory and the dependency theory will be used to explain the existing conflict between Israel and Palestine. It will also be able to justify the use of force by the Israeli government when dealing with Palestinian Hamas. Realism theory in the Israeli and Palestine conflict Realism theory explains how states are selfish, struggle to gain power and succeed in acquiring its national interests in the international system. Realists identify world politics as a trans-historical and trans-geographical struggle for power, and that in this context Thucydides’ dictum that, “the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept” (where strength and weakness are calculated by military capabilities) is the stark and universal truth (Schmidt, 2007; Thucydides, 1972, p. 402).

Read More

Realism And Idealism In International Relations

897 Words | 4 Pages

Idealism and Realism are two strongly opposed views of foreign policy. At the core of this opposition is the issue of power and security in politics. Realism establishes a separation between politics and ethics in order to understand and comprehend international events. Realists don’t oppose morality to politics, nor power to law, but rather oppose the utopian peaceful society to the nature of society.

Read More

Difference Between Classical And Classical Realism

795 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, it provides differences between the status quo power and progressive states, while maintaining and emphasizing the importance of government at the same time. In contrary, Structural Realism is more concerned on ensuring their survival, by seeking and maintaining that power. Structural Realism would treat states as they are black boxes: they are assumed to be alike (Mearsheimer). Furthermore, Classical Realism and Structural Realism differ in their views of interconnection in international politics, fundamentally what causes the observed outcomes in relations among states. Classical Realists believe that the international world is one of interacting states, and causes run in one direction.

Read More

Similarities Between Realism And Liberalism

1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More

Waltz's Theory Of Neorealism

1036 Words | 5 Pages

The factors that I will look at are: the state of anarchy, an overarching regulatory body, their main objective, ranking and sovereignty. This is by no means an exhaustive list. By the end, I will strive to determine whether this analogy is accurate and, if it is, to what extent. Kenneth Waltz is the father of neorealism. His book, Theory of International Politics, departs from the classical and neoclassical realism theories.

Read More

More about Is Realism A Realistic Approach For Understanding Contemporary Global Politics

Related Topics

Open Document