ipl-logo

Reasons Why The North Did Not Support Slavery In 1860

427 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slavery in north vs south

In 1860, the U.S. was divided. It was divided into the North, South, and New Territories. It was also divided in terms of their views on slavery. The North believed that slavery was wrong, the South completely supported the idea, and the West was indifferent at the time. The North was opposed to slavery. They believed that it was unjust to force others to work on someone else’s behalf. However is they chose to work then they deserved some sort of compensation. One last reason why the North did not support slavery was because they felt that African Americans were people and should not be treated like or sold as property. “It’s a matter of taking the side of the weak against the strong, something the best people have always done.” -Harriet
Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

The general argument made by David Herbert Donald in Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the Territories is that the issue of slavery in the national territories started the Civil War. More specifically, Donald argues that the Kansas-Nebraska Act, crafted by Stephen A. Douglas, revived the issue of slavery in the territories and divided the nation into hostile sections which turned the great forces that once cement American unity into a tool that further divided the nation. Donald points out that North detested slavery to the conception of slavery as being un-American and was the main reason why the South was lagging behind. In order to abolish slavery, the North, who held the majority in the national government, acted on the regulation of national territories. The national territories were one of the few areas that the North could act against slavery since they did not have power over slavery within the states it existed.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

Northern and Southern opinions on slavery differed greatly and caused a major divide. While the South fully supported slavery, the Northern citizens were abolitionists set on dissolving the act. Northern Whigs were major abolitionists before and during the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 forced all African-Americans in the US to become slaves if they were found by any slave owner, even if he was not their own. This law applied to the entirety of the country, thus making free African-Americans subject to slavery and inhibiting the Whigs from legally protecting any remaining Northern African-Americans (Document M).

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

So if you did not like slavery, you moved to the North, and this only helped divide the people by their opinions. On document 1 there are 2 maps, one of railroads, and one of slave density and cotton production. This divide made the country’s economy completely different. While the North had almost no cotton production, the south is full of plantations creating slave based profit. The North used factories and modern technology for profit and the South was almost purely dedicated to raw materials such as cotton, hay, and other cash crops.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The North and South both had very different opinions on the issue of slavery, the North thinking that slavery was a terrible thing, and the South wanting it to stay. The North thought that slavery needed to be abolished, while the South thought it should stay, though they both thought that what they were doing was right and just. First of all, the North wanted slavery to be abolished due to it making humans dehumanized and forced to be treated like animals. In the first document Lincoln says, “when this Government was first established, it was the policy of its founders to prohibit the spread of slavery into the new Territories of the United States, where it had not existed.” This shows that Lincoln does not want slavery to continue spreading,

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

The Fugitive slave law was an act passed to help southern slave owners maintain their slaves. The act was part of the “Compromise of 1850” proposed by Henry Clay. The compromise was made to resolve disputes between the south and north about land and slavery. The south ended up having slavery allowed below the “36,30” and California joined in as a free state. In the 1840s there were many problems of runaway slaves to the North to become free men.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Overall, the North’s views on slavery is the correct way of thinking because slavery is evil, unconstitutional. And morally wrong. The North saw the idea of slavery as evil. They believed that slavery was an impurity that became accustomed to life in America, in which other systems of commerce forgotten.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

They simply wanted to help men who had less freedoms and support than a slave. It was often stated that the industrial workers in the North were less well fed, had worse housing, and had rattier clothing than the slaves in the South. It does not seem right to give the workers in the North less freedoms and a harder life than slaves who have absolutely no freedom, and we're seen

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

Decisions made in the 1850s ultimately decided the United States fate. From the election of 1856 to the Dred Scott case, the nation would become divided into two. The South was pro-slavery and supported the idea of slavery expanded into western territories, while the North opposed of the idea and was mainly against expanding slavery. Until the 1850s the nation barely balanced the slavery issue.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

In the town of Pennsylvania, Gettysburg, 3,000 Union soldiers prepared to face 60,000 Confederate soldiers in battle. The Battle of Gettysburg is known to have been the day the Union regained its ground. An estimated 50,000 soldiers were killed, captured or wounded. The battle turned out to be a crushing defeat for the Confederacy. However, if the Confederacy turned out to be successful in conquering the Union at Gettysburg, the outcome of the Civil War would have been different than things turned out to be.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

The North was against slavery because they did not enjoy the fact that you can buy a human just like you and make them property. That is why the North did not

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Slavery was in opposition throughout the northern states, almost everyone opposed the concept of slavery. William Henry Seward, William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and Henry David Thoreau were a few of the thousands of people that opposed the concept of one not getting paid for work and having the same rights as objects. These people had two options to show what they believed in, break the law and oppose the government completely, or give their opposition due process to go through the government and see if what they believe in is just and constitutional. If you do not believe in something should you break the law to fight for what you stand for?

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

Everyone knows what a slave is, its a person who is being held against their will and forced to do a task without payment or able to exercise their freedom. Back then in a America, before equal rights. Before the civil war, that at least gave the slaves the freedom to do as they please under the law. As we know from American history. Almost everyone, in the south and some supporters in the north believed that slavery was okay.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Northerners who opposed slavery didn't want any new slave states, slave owners in the south wanted all new states to be slave states because plantation life in the South was so hard, they needed more people to work on it for free, which were the slaves. Slaves worked on plantations and got nothing in return, This made the slave owners get more profit from it because they’re not paying people to work on the plantation but rather earning from it. According to pbs.org, “Many Northern freeman have been enslaved, in some cases under color of law. Oct, 26, 1836, a man named Frank, who was born in PA.., and lived free in Ohio, was hurried into slavery by an Ohio Justice of the peace.” This quote shows that, A Northern free man was set up by an Ohio Justice of the peace to get rushed into slavery, This is because he stated that he was free from slavery and they didn’t want that to happen.

Read More

More about Reasons Why The North Did Not Support Slavery In 1860

Open Document