Rebellion In Animal Farm By George Orwell

In the Animal Farm, George Orwell writes, “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which” (141). Things that the animals’ want after the rebellion did not happen, and even worse the situation is back to the time before it, which means the animals have waste their time and life because of the rebellion with no result. Accordingly, the animal’s works harder than they did under the control of farmer Jones, but they did not even receive the amount of food they received before. Moreover, other farmers attack the Animal Farm, also, the animals are shivering in fear cause by their leader Napoleon, who will kill them in any minutes if they shows even

Napoleon slaughters the animals, and the other farmers attack the farm and hurt the animals. If they did not rebel, the animals do not need to consider about safety problems that happen to them. For example, Orwell mentions, “Napoleon now called upon them to confess their crimes…. When they had finished their confession, the dogs promptly tore their throat out…” (83,84). Farmer Jones also has slaughter the animals’, but he only kill the animal because are dying. However, after the rebellion the animals have to be more careful about want they do and think because they might get kill at any time. Furthermore, the author writes, “…Frederick and his follower had already come through five-barred gate…there were fifteen men, with half a dozen guns between them, and they opened fire as soon as they got within fifty yards” (101). The farmers are attacking them because they fear the Animal Farm will affect their own animals. So, if the animals have not rebelled, they do not even have to consider this terrible event would happen. I admit that the animal did not have freedom with Jones, but at least they are more secure with the protection of farmer Jones. As the animals lives in the insecure life that threaten by Napoleon and other farmers, it would have been better for them to live with

The animal’s situation is back to Jones time just with a different master, which means they waste the time to rebel. For instance, Orwell write, “About this time, too, it was laid down as a rule that when a pig and any other animal met on the path, the other animal must stand aside: and also that all pigs, of whatever degree, were to have the privilege green ribbons on their tails on Sunday” (114). Orwell clearly shows that pigs and other animals are not equal any more. In addition, Orwell composes, “… the name “Animal Farm” had been abolished. Henceforward the farm was to be known as “The Manor Farm”—which, he believed, was its correct and original name” (140). The author wants the reader to notice Napoleon changes the name of the farm back the original, which means the situation of other animals is back to Jones time only with a different master, the pigs. But pigs are still animals, and animals know how each other feels. So, the pigs will treat the animals better. The animals have to be enslaved even after the rebellion, which is same as their original living arrangements, at least the animals would not have to experience all kinds of things they got through as they rebel. As the pig’s forces servitude the other animals, it would have been better if they lived with