ipl-logo

Reduce Inequality In The United States

1743 Words7 Pages

Evaluate the impact of polices designed to reduce inequality in countries of your choice. [30 Marks].
Introduction:
There are many causes of Poverty around the world, and different countries all have slightly different policies when dealing with it. Furthermore there are two types of poverty that all countries have to consider. These are called Absolute and Relative Poverty. Absolute Poverty occurs when individuals are not able to consume sufficient necessities to maintain life, such as food/water, clothing and shelter. Relative Poverty is always present in society. The relatively poor are those at the bottom end of the income scale, often those that rely on others for income. A common measure used by many countries is the Gini Coefficient …show more content…

This means that some people might be living comfortably for themselves but a family might not be able to. A solution to this could be to set taxes on a set of criteria, or to have a standardised tax system where everyone pays 20% (or something similar).
The taxes, based on criteria, could be slightly harder to implement, even though the UK already has a similar system. It would depend on how many criteria and how different it is to the system we have at the moment. The more criteria the harder to implement, but it would also maximise the governments’ revenue from taxes, as it is similar to price discrimination. However many people would have a greater incentive to try tax dodging, which could cause problems for the government, as they would need to hire more staff to deal with the increased workload of tax collection.
The method of a 20% tax means that everyone would pay different amounts on their earnings, but it is easier to enforce. However 20% of some incomes – like those in absolute or relative poverty – might be too large, as it could take away too much of their income, and push them further into …show more content…

South Africa is an key example of an unequal country that has a progressive income tax system, that raises large amounts of revenue at relatively low cost and with relatively little tax evasion. Company taxes are already a significant share of tax revenue, though there may be scope to increase taxes from mineral rents. There is also scope to raise further the level of taxation on the richest 10%. It is thought that this progressive income tax, has helped lower South Africa’s Gini index, as the distribution becomes more spread, providing the index is taken after taxes have been applied. The revenue from the taxes can be used for benefits for those in absolute or relative poverty, or to improving the education system – so that students stay in education for longer. The benefits and costs of improving the education system come later in the essay. The question is, is the revenue from the taxes used appropriately within South Africa? The answer depends on what we term as

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

The income tax would try to even the playing field, so the rich would have to pay higher taxes while the poor pay smaller taxes. Also, the income tax would serve as payment for the government so in turn they can pay for different areas of

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Title Economic inequality was created. Lots of factors lead to the long-standing social inequality, such as gender, ethnicity, age, level of education and so on. How would people split up income between the top ten percent and the rest if it were up to them? It depends on which group they belong to. They strive for more benefit for themselves.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Justificatory Argument Progressive Tax System is Pivotal for Our Nation’s Progressive Growth As the 2016 presidential election nears, the debate on tax reforms is heating up. In the latest presidential candidate debate in November, the Republican candidate Ben Carson proposed the adoption of flat-tax rate: “Everybody should pay the same proportion of what they make”. At least four other Republican candidates have talked up their support for replacing the current tax system with a flat tax system, saying that it will substantially simplify the tax collecting process. However, it is important to note that the use of progressive tax system is necessary for effective wealth redistribution and the subsequent maximization of social utility.

Read More
1215 Words | 5 Pages

In Source 1 the writer is demonstrating values in equity in the income platform of society with a strong belief that income should be relatively similar while varying slightly based on the needs of individuals. The goal of this system is to provide every citizen with a strong quality of life based on a criteria that determines their needs to maintain such quality. By spreading the wealth evenly and fairly people will have enough to provide their families with education, healthcare, food, housing and even some luxuries. The writer believes changing to a criteria based system would not pose any negative effects on the economy since all citizens would be in a better position to contribute. Quality of life would likely rise due to an overall decrease

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that is our duties as citizens to help those less fortunate and help care for our fellow citizens. Therefore, this may require that we have to pay more taxes in order to provide for

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

For some people, one third of their wages went towards taxes. as the second most important problem because it causes a lot of problems to be created, but isn’t as important as the first. A possible way of solving the problem is to make it so the more money you have, the more tax you have to pay. Making the tax fairer for everyone.

Read More
1766 Words | 8 Pages

Should America implement a flat tax? According to Steve Forbes “For many years, people have said, ‘Make the rich pay more,’ and many politicians have said, ‘The rich people need to pay their fair share,’” (Forbes) but what do we think is really fair?

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

One of the arguments used is that we could regulate and tax the 1% income because that would be “fair” but these numbers show how harmful that way of thinking is. 18% of taxes for the “bottom” of the bracket which is around 20% of the U.S population.

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

The federal tax system is plagued with issues: It doesn 't raise sufficient revenue to back government spending, it is unpredictable, it makes results that are unreasonable, and it impedes monetary productivity. This part examines a few approaches to enhance charges, including making an esteem included duty, expanding natural taxes, improving the corporate expense, treating low-and center pay workers evenhandedly and productively, and guaranteeing suitable tax collection of high-wage family units. A good tax system raises the incomes expected to fund government spending in a way that is as basic, evenhanded, and development well growth as could reasonably be expected. The United States does not have a good tax system.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States, we favor progressive income tax. It is a taxing mechanism in which the taxing authority charges more taxes as the income of the taxpayer increases. A lower tax is collected from taxpayers earning less. The higher class is affected more by this taxation, because they are taxed higher than the middle and lower class. Many people argue that this taxation is not fair, because the higher class, just like the middle and low class, work for their money, and should not be punished for their wealth by paying higher.

Read More
1412 Words | 6 Pages

In Graph 12, shows the income distrubition in 2009 while figure 2 display the values for each income group. Figure 2, shows that in the lowest income share, 20% of it’s population have to live with 3.2% of the total income generated in the country. In comparison, the richest 20% accounts for 58.5% of all the total income earned. Data from the last few decades indicate that the lowest income has increased it’s income share margin from 2.7% in 2000 to 3.2% in 2009, a rise of 15.6%. On the other hand, the highest income group has lost it’s share, from 62.3% to 58/5% within the nine

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

Taxes should be the same for everyone. They should at least be the same percentage of an individual's income. This would be a much more equitable way for the government to get its operating funds, and individuals would better be able to estimate

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

In Taiwan, the taxing standard is based on the annual revenue. Every person who gets slavery needs to pay 20% of the income for income tax. A millionaire who earns $10,000,000 a year need to pay $2,000,000 for the income tax while a blue-collar worker who earns $600,000 per year only needs to be taxed $120,000. This taxing standard is equal to both rich and poor people. Therefore, tax on rich more is necessary and it will make the country

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Moreover resources are more diverted to high income consumers leading to misallocation of resources. Policies for an equitable distribution by government usually conflict with the goals of more efficient economy as it is likely to inhibit the efficient operation of price system. Equitable income distribution is also likely to discourage people to work at their best capabilities leading to

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

But, taxing the rich more also wouldn’t be impartial that fair because the government already wastes much of the money pay they collect. Even though the wealthy have a higher income and can afford it, most of the wealthy worked hard to get where they are now. If we make the Making the rich pay higher taxes will have advantages and disadvantages as well.

Read More

More about Reduce Inequality In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document