ipl-logo

Reflection Of Relativism

1040 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Relativism : cultural relativism and individual relativism

The way many people think about morals is that everyone has the same moral standard and principle that make certain actions appear to be general, to be constituted for everyone. Relativism is a topic in which it determines what could be right or wrong and true or false. Relativism itself is a topic used in ethics to describe morality in societies. Through this, we determine that moral relativism is described as the values that are determined by the society that we grew up in and that there are no universal values. This can be viewed as a prevalent issue as many do not view morality in this sense. Popular relativism states that there can be different moral standards for different societies. As such, each and every society has there own moral value and through this, they have their own moral beliefs and practices. In this sense, the morals in every society are, in its own …show more content…

Viewing both parts of the negative and positive aspects of relativism I would say that it would have to depend on the situation I’m in for me to determine what would be morally correct. Yet, in certain ways, I would have to disagree with relativism. If for whatever reason I live in a society that I do not agree with, relativism says that I have to conform with that society and follow their moral beliefs. It would seem as if I would be living in a trapped world. If I lived in an area where slavery was morally acceptable, I would not like that. There’s also the situation that if relativism were to be true then I would not be able to agree with many historical figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. Without historical figures like him, people would not be able to live the life they so much appreciate now. Besides, allowing moral practices like genocide, slavery, or discrimination, is not morally acceptable to me. Those situations are not ethical to me and if it can be acceptable in relativism, then relativism itself is not

Show More
Related
424 Words | 2 Pages

Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

In Louis Pojman’s “Argument Against Moral Relativism”, he classifies the three premises for ethical relativism. Those of which include the diversity thesis, the dependency thesis and the final result of ethical relativism. Following his explanation of these three ideals, he goes onto explain as to why each one of them are invalid. Of the arguments that he provided, I’d consider his justification against the concept of subjectivism.

Read More
3020 Words | 13 Pages

Relativism from the Christian perspective is wrong because its acting in the way that is right for you. They say that some things could be correct for you but wrong for others. Many non believers agree with this because they don’t want to try and make a decision that is the right thing in their own life. The worlds standards and their perspective on this issue is right according to them. According to their presuppositions, they don’t believe in a God which allows for their action to act the way that they want.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The ethics of cultural relativism are different than traditional ethical theories mainly because cultural relativism dismisses morality. Cultural relativism is named so because the ethics of different cultures

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

R01365382 Ethical Relativism is the belief that what is morally right and wrong varies from culture to culture, or even from person to person. Ruth Benedict writes, “A Defense of Ethical Relativism”, in which she presents data she has collected to defend ethical relativism. In contrast, Louis Pojman writes, “A Critique of Ethical Relativism”, in which he presents various problems with ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is not a good way of deciding between what is morally right and what is morally wrong.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

”(p.19) This shows that in the study of ethics, the study of moral relativism to be more specific, the idea of universal truth does not exist. That is to say what is perceived as “good” or “right” can vary form culture to culture, so there is no way to have one universal truth. Two major examples of cultural differences that are often cited in Support

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Ethical relativism is the belief that actions are right or wrong depending on the norms of a society. Ethical relativists decide on a moral issue by taking into account societal norms and mob mentality, not deciding what is absolutely right or wrong. The Nazis in Schindler’s List are ethical relativists because they judge what is right or wrong according to their society and the Nazi Party. Since they were young, the Nazi’s were taught to believe that the Jews were animals, not human beings. If the young Nazi’s in training questioned this or did not agree, they were punished and seen as a traitor to Germany.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

Read More
2321 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Cultural relativism has a variety of definitions, but the main idea is that a universal code of ethics does not exist--it varies culture to culture. Rachel’s examines cultural relativism in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” and argues that there are commonalities of ethics throughout every culture. Rachels sections off his argument to better explain what they believe. In this piece, they argue that cultural relativism is not a proper theory. They argue that it has many major flaws, but they acknowledge that parts of theory have some truth to it.

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

Reflection, what is it? By David Mulcahy. (14375771)

Read More
2607 Words | 11 Pages

In general, on a popular argument for ethical relativism would be the untenability of objectivism. It is a persuasive justification for moral relativism because it is the best alternative following the failure of objectivism. The fact that moral objectivists themselves are uncertain, incongruent and unsettled on a standard moral system is the primary catalyst encouraging moral skepticism (IEP, Argument for Moral Relativism). Cultural relativism outlines that “an action is morally right, relative to a culture, just because it is right according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.” Conversely, if “an action is morally wrong, relative to a culture, just because it is wrong according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.”

Read More

More about Reflection Of Relativism

Related Topics

Open Document