Research Paper On 1984 By George Orwell

2428 Words10 Pages

III. George Orwell’s Beliefs: The book 1984 gives readers a chilling and disturbing picture into what life would look like under an all-seeing and absolute controlling government during the year 1984. Since this year has already passed, some might say that this situation will never happen. While it is true that the actual year will never transpire again, it is absolutely incorrect to assume that 1984 is just a scare tactic and nothing more. George Orwell painted a terrifying picture to showcase the worst side of humanity, a depraved power that controls everything and everyone else, a power that can reshape reality into whatever it chooses to be. The book reveals an important message to the intelligent reader, a message that outlines the definition …show more content…

Anything resembling individuality is prohibited. “Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull.” (Orwell 27) Even if total brainwashing is not the case in today’s world, there are relevant similarities to the Party in 1984 and current governments. George Orwell used his novel to point out the dangers of a totalitarian government. Though a fallible man, he had insight into the consequences of ideas. In 1984, a biography on Orwell and his book, it says, “It was in Spain, too, that he caught the first warning signs of a phenomenon that would oppress him until the end of his life, a suspicion that the idea of objective truth was ‘falling out of the world’ (Taylor 39). In the future, he believed, history books would simply reflect the prejudices of those who happened to be in power.” Orwell knew that ideas had power, and that they were able to shape entire realities. However, Orwell was obsessed with class and society, as well as harboring a deep fear of failure. He believed that a controlling government created an unstable society. “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes …show more content…

It is unrealistic to assume that when a government has the power to monitor and even control their civilians to some extent, it is easily relinquished back to the people. It will take much more than an individual seeking to hide from invasive data control; rather, a community and a whole country banded together to stop totalitarian endeavors. “In the past, social movements have been crucial to passing laws that recognize rights and improve society. Exploitative practices end when they are banned by law, but people like you and me are the ones who have to change the culture so that laws can be passed and enforced. To change our privacy landscape, we have to write about it, persuade others to protect their and our privacy, get organized, unveil the inner workings of the abusive system that is the surveillance society, support alternatives, envision new possibilities, and refuse to cooperate in our own surveillance.” (Vèliz 91) The present circumstance is certainly not hopeless, rather, it provides an opportunity for action. The U.S. is on a slippery slope, but it can get better. The tech world is a fragile place, since it relies on the usage of people’s