Research Paper On Fahrenheit 451

Would the world benefit and be more fair if there was no access to education for anyone? The book Fahrenheit 451 explores this question and what a futuristic society would be like if books were banned. In the dystopian world the characters live in, things like burning houses down, TV screens as big as walls, running people over in a car for fun, and more are all normalized. The story follows a young Guy Montag, and his experience as a fireman at that time. The firemen in this society are focused on getting rid of books that people may still own, even though they have been banned. If they find out anyone has any amount of books stored away somewhere in their house, they burn the house down to ensure the books are destroyed. As it progresses,

Committee members accused several prominent Hollywood screenwriters and directors of creating Communist-influenced films, causing them to be blacklisted,” (King-Ries). Thanks to Senator McCarthy, the US media became heavily censored, especially anything that may have contained the slightest mention of communism. Similar to the US, the government in Fahrenheit 451 also strictly controlled what was seen on TV, in books, and in the news. Censoring and blacklisting certain topics from the media was a huge issue for the US and the government in Fahrenheit 451 alike, since they tried to hide information from the public. Germany, before and during WWII, was also showing parallels to Fahrenheit 451 on the topics of authoritarianism, censorship, and fire being used solely for destruction. Montag and the firemen are alerted that they need to go burn an old woman’s house since it was discovered that she had a collection of books. When the firemen got there, they told the woman that she needed to leave immediately or she would die. They were spraying kerosene everywhere in her house in preparation for the

The government seemingly does not want individuals to be anything but happy. The information contained in books has become something that can disturb people and make others feel inferior, which led to their being banned. The government did not want to expose the public specifically to fictional writing, because it shared new, original, and creative ideas that would promote individual thought and curiosity amongst the people. “A 2002 law aimed at combating terrorism ‘[targeted] speech, publications, groups, and ideas deemed 'extremist,' a broadly defined notion interpreted subjectively by officials.’. And those provisions dovetail with the Law on Protection of Children from Information Harmful to Their Health and Development, passed in 2010, which required widespread content labeling and gave government agencies wide latitude to crack down on content that might be interpreted as glamorizing violence or drug use, and a 2013 law that cracked down on content that treats gay people in any remotely positive way The amount of censorship in the media has been increasing rapidly in