More handpicked essays just for you.
Retributivist and reductivist approach to punishment
Kant philosophy of law and justice
Retributive theory of punishment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Thus bringing in to account the principle of lex talionis. Which is the right to be paid back with similar harm and the equality of persons. Meaning an eye for an eye, they deserve it because they did it therefore intimidating people from murdering because they don’t want to die. It is also to be said through Kantian ethics that a rational individual who kills another authorizes his own execution. Executing murderers sets as a statement that murder is absolutely evil and will not be tolerated.
I INTRODUCTION TO SOLITARY CONFINEMENT It is somewhere around three a.m. in the morning. You wake up to an empty, cold room, no larger than 60 square feet, with nothing but four walls surrounding you. You are stripped, handcuffed and taken about 30 feet outside your cell where you are allowed a brief shower.
The concept of retribution sits well in the framework of police work. My parents, both being former police officers, believe heavily in retribution/just deserts. It is ingrained in the mindset of police, “You do the crime, and you pay the time.” The majority of the Reagan police family has that ideology. Retribution is also known as Just Deserts, which the book argues is a term that more liberals use, which is punishment that is due to the offender but only the punishment the offender deserves as to not cause the offender more suffering than deserved.
Michael Fay was an 18 year old teenager living in Singapore, and was arrested in 1994 for multiple counts of vandalism. The Singaporean government in turn sentenced him to a series of canings, which sparked a controversy that lasts to this day; was his punishment right? In “Time to Assert American Values,” an article published in the New York Times, the writer emphasizes that Singapore’s caning punishment is very controversial in the sense that many believe that it is wrong, and many consider it torture. In contrast, “Rough Justice: A Caning in Singapore Stirs up a Fierce Debate about Crime and Punishment,” an article by Alejandro Reyes, discusses not only the harshness of Singapore’s punishments, but also the fact that caning is their own
Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty. " In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?", Nathanson gives objections to why equality retributivism is morally acceptable for the death penalty to be legal.
Restorative justice also known as balanced and restorative justice is “a sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to make the victim whole again (Schmalleger 269).” Restorative justice focuses on “crime as harm and justice as repairing the harm”. This type of justice places crime control primarily in the hands of the community. 3. Indeterminate sentencing encourages rehabilitation using general unspecific sentences.
we neglect our own perfection. While there are additional duties that make us better moral persons, it is difficult to analyze them under C1 or C2 because of the uniqueness of these duties which focus on improving our capacity to act dutifully. Given that there are no duties to self derivable from C1 alone in the Doctrines of Virtues, when we turn to a discussion of duties to others we face even more complications. All the duties of love (and likewise benevolence) are loosely derived from C1. While we might consider other’ ends, we may not give practical assistance to others, such as neighbor who is in bad circumstance.
The Unfair Advantage Theory All explained above was about the classical retributivism. At the end of the 20th century, because of some failings in practical theories and utilitarianism, retributivism was regenerated. In those years, somehow early 1980s, Michael Davis proposed his theory, named ' 'fairness theory ' ', about the punishment by which he advanced the retributivism theory and made it more evolved. He argued that the punishment should fit not only the crime but also the amount of ' 'unfair advantage ' ' which were achieved by the wrongdoer.
Those that agree with this view hold that retribution must be had for those who have been wronged. If one commits a crime he should
By punishment being declared, the boost in compassion towards another stresses the value of vengeance to be worth more than forgiveness because it will allow them to be willing to forgive their
We said that retributive justice is a matter of giving those who commit crimes against humanity what they deserve. Hence, the advantages of taking a retributive approach falls under that notion. Pros of using retributive justice approach • Assault: Setting example - a prison sentence provides immediate punishment. It will leave the offender with no doubt that hurting someone is not acceptable.
There are three main theories of punishment: retributive, utilitarian, and restitution. Firstly, retributive or the just deserts punishment theory must be examined again. Under retributive or just deserts punishment, a person is judged only on what he or she has done. Under this theory, the Pre-Crime system is immoral because how can a person be punished for something he or she has never done. The Pre-Crime system punishes based on thought, impulse, and planning regardless of whether or not the act was actually committed.
Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.
A criminal resisting punishment is usually considered a greater menace to society than one who obediently accepts his punishment. Further, it seems illogical that there be, both, a right to punish and a right to resist punishment. When punishment is legitimate, why should a criminal be allowed to resist it? Even more strange seems the concept of respecting criminals. Why must we respect them?
In general aesthetics is defined as concept that is dualistic - it involves on the one hand the artist and on the other hand the art critic or the philosopher. Aesthetics is a branch of philosophy and as such is interested in art itself and not in specific works of art. Modern aesthetics became distinct in the middle of the eighteenth century, and it was then also when claims that were trying to privilege aesthetic reason or experience arose. Such statements of aesthetic reason are present in Kant’s Critique of Judgement published in 1790.
