In paper 4, while I found my rhetorical analysis to be satisfactory the paper itself suffered from a myriad of careless mistakes and poor attention to audience.
The largest detriment was the number of silly mistakes, most of which appeared in previous papers. Such as forgetting the rubric, and fragmented sentences. However, despite the careless mistakes, the writing related mistakes in my paper were less frequent. And I find that satisfactory evidence of at least a semblance of improvement.
The major detriment to the paper was its lack of regard for its audience. My introduction was quite dry and uninteresting to the prospective reader, and unlikely to encourage the papers continued reading. As such, I must attempt to be more aware of my