ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam

1641 Words7 Pages

“Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence” Rhetorical Analysis
Over the years there have been many great speeches said by very good orators, but few of them had the effect that Martin Luther King, Jr. had on his audience, and none were as famous as his “I Have A Dream” speech. What made Dr. King’s speech so compelling was the fact that he was preacher and was very good at capturing the audience’s attention. The way he presented his arguments to captivate the audience and to get them to agree with whatever he was saying was a technique called the Aristoliean rhetoric, a device that helped him persuade his audience to accomplish his goals. But when he made the “Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence” speech on April 4, 1967, it was not recognized …show more content…

We want nothing for ourselves—only that the people of South Vietnam be allowed to guide their own country in their own way. We will do everything necessary to reach that objective, and we will do only what is absolutely necessary.
So when Johnson sent more troops to Vietnam, it angered Dr. King because more young African American were being drafted to the war, when the president’s attention should have been directed to the problems in America (Young 1).
Martin Luther King, Jr. makes logical appeals in “A Time to Break Silence” speech about how in times of war "men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy" and that “antiwar activists should ‘demonstrate, teach, and preach until the country’s foundations were shaken” even when no organization was supporting him, he was achieving great results, but the changes were occurring because of “the growing number of men in American political life who began to dissent from U.S. policy” (Reed 159). Even in an interview, Dr. King was told that it wasn’t a good idea to criticize the policy on war, and Dr. King answered by saying, “Even when pressed by the demand of inner truth, (people) do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world” (Reaves). …show more content…

Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 26 Jan. 2011.
King, Jr., Martin Luther. "Beyond Vietnam--A Time to Break Silence." American Rhetoric: Online Speech Bank. Web. 26 Jan. 2011. .
"King's Call for a 'Revolution of Values'." National Catholic Reporter 43.11 (2007): 24. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 26 Jan. 2011.
King, William M. “Reemerging Revolutionary Consciousness of The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” The Journal of Negro History. 71.No. 1/4 (1986): 1-22. JSTOR. Web. 24 Jan. 2011.
Reaves, Bill. "Time to Break Silence: An Interview with Dr. King." New York Amsterdam News 88.6 (1997): 30. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 26 Jan. 2011.
Reed, Harry A. “Martin Luther King, Jr.: History and Memory, Reflections on Dreams and Silences” The Journal of Negro History. 8.2 (1999): 150. Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Jan. 2011.
Shujaa, Mwalimu J. "The Widening Gap between Education and Schooling in the Post 9/11 Era” The Journal of Negro Education. 72.2 (2003): 179-89. JSTOR. Web. 23 Jan. 2011.
Young, Stephen B. "President Lyndon B. Johnson's Vietnam War Disengagement Strategy." Vietnam (2006): 1. HistoryNet.com. Web. 8 Feb.

Show More
Related
822 Words | 4 Pages

And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, “a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war” state Hill and Wang from the book review. Although a limitation is that in almost every book about Martin Luther King including this one, only describe King’s successes and not all the failures. This occurs because the authors do not want to portray a bad image about a good man, but it is very important for us to know these failures so that we can learn and not have to understand why King did specific things, plus this topic is one of the most important events in U.S. history that’s why we need to know exactly what happened especially its when its going to remembered for many years to

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1967 speech, “Beyond Vietnam”, the author, activist Martin Luther King jr, states reasons why America needs to end their involvement in the Vietnam War. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. In his speech addressed to the laymen and clergy at Riverside Church he used pathos, logos, imagery, and an argument shift to list the reasons why America should withdraw their troops, and to create sympathy within his audience.

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

But, as the South Vietnamese were fighting for their liberation from a communist regime and the Americans were not, the Americans could not provide the Vietnamese with the will to win. Seeing as their efforts in Vietnam were not as effective as had been hoped for, America began to lose support for the war as tensions at home increased. “It is like sending a lion to halt an epidemic of jungle rot,” [Doc E]. The lions that were being sent, as many of the time recognized, were often minorities and oppressed people. Martin Luther King, a popular civil rights activist, said, “We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem,” [Doc C].

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Violence is said to never be the answer in any situation, as determined by America's constitution. If the basis of America is non-violence, the question comes up, why did America fight in Vietnam? Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Junior sets out to solve this tragedy by giving a speech.

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

I find Ho Chi Minh’s letter far more persuasive than Lyndon B. Johnson’s. Using ethos, pathos, and logos, he forms a solid argument that supports Vietnam’s stance on the war. He appeals to one’s emotions by expressing the injustices faced by his people, writing, “In South Viet-Nam a half-million American soldiers and soldiers from the satellite countries have resorted to the most barbarous methods of warfare, such as napalm, chemicals, and poison gases in order to massacre our fellow countrymen, destroy the crops, and wipe out villages.” Words such as “massacre” and “barbarous” highlight the severity of these crimes, and invoke feelings of guilt and remorse in the reader. Chi Minh uses ethos to support his logos, or logical, views on the

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

By organizing the boycott and leading the nonviolent resistance against segregated buses, Dr. King embodied the principles of the social contract, asserting that every citizen should enjoy the same rights and privileges, regardless of race. This section provides a deep analysis of Dr. King's unwavering commitment to nonviolent resistance as a powerful tool for social and political change. By consistently advocating for peaceful means to achieve racial equality, he emphasized the persuasive and critical aspects of his philosophy. His unwavering belief in nonviolence aligned with the social contract's emphasis on peaceful democratic processes as the path to

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

All they wanted was “to save the soul of America” (King, Beyond, 42). Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech “Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence” that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and the Civil Rights Struggle of the 1950s and 1960s. A Brief History with Documents written by David Howard-Pitney is a great history book that gives us an entry into two important American thinkers and a tumultuous part of American history. This 207-pages book was published by Bedford/St. Martin’s in Boston, New York on February 20, 2004. David Howard-Pitney worked at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project at Stanford University in 1986, and that made him a specialist on American civil religion and African-American leaders ' thought and rhetoric (208). Another publication of Howard-Pitney is The African-American Jeremiad: Appeals for Justice in America.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Dr. King feels that he cannot speak against violence being used in the ghettos without having protested the greatest use of violence, “[his] own government.” (Paragraph 3). Dr. King uses specificity such as “Molotov cocktails and rifles” (Paragraph 3) to create a vivid image of the violence that has occurred in his own nation. Dr. King made this speech to address the violence going on in the Vietnam War.

Read More
2324 Words | 10 Pages

Throughout his career, Martin Luther King Jr. had an unwavering dedication to achieving his goal of an integrated society through non-violent means. His ultimate goal was to achieve a “beloved community” which he believed a truly just society was one that loved all members of the human race (Howard-Pitney, 57). With legal segregation and black suffrage being largely secured by mid-1965, King shifted his focus towards aiding the impoverished as he believed that addressing this issue was interconnected with the need to achieve full equality for African Americans. In this same year, the United States decided to enter the Vietnam war, gaining harsh criticism from King on the government’s capitalism and foreign policies. His growing radicalism caused a downfall in his support from the U.S government and the whites as in his 1967 address at New York City’s Riverside Church where he labelled the government as “the greatest purveyor of violence”(King,

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine making a speech in front of large audience. The speech "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence" by Martin Luther King Jr. was delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967. He effectively builds an argument by using three models of persuasion ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. The first technique King used is based on ethos, establishing his credibility. King convinces the audience gaining credibility describing how the "desperate, rejected, and angry young men," (...) "ask - and rightly so - what about Vietnam?" in feedback to King's thought in peace.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

During the era of the civil rights movements in the 60s, among the segregation, racism, and injustice against the blacks, Martin Luther King Jr. stood at the Lincoln Memorial to deliver one of the greatest public speeches for freedom in that decade. In Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech he effectively uses ethos, diction and powerful metaphors to express the brutality endured by African American people. Yet his most important method of reaching his audience, and conveying his enduring message of equality and freedom for the whole nation was his appeal to pathos. With these devices, King was able to move thousands of hearts and inspire the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Opening his speech Martin Luther King Jr. sets up his credibility with his use of ethos, referring to the Declaration of Independence saying, “This note was a promise that all men… would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life.”

Read More
1848 Words | 8 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. Hence, King’s works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

In his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech, King spoke with an unwavering faith in America and an audacious belief in the future of mankind. In King’s speech, the theme that surfaces is one of refusing despair and embracing the hope for a brighter

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr was a Civil Rights leader during the 50’s and 60’s. MLK was pushing for the North and South to stand up against racism that appeared in American society. MLK was very effective in his skills with this. He as well liked keeping his beliefs presented in a non-violent form. In this video, “A Time to Break Silence” King speaks about his views on the Vietnam War.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam

Related Topics

Open Document