Rhetorical Analysis Of Dave Chappelle On Jussie Smollett Incident

Maxen Yuzon May 1st, 2024 Rhetoric of Story Rhetorical Criticism of “Dave Chappelle on Jussie Smollett Incident” In a public sphere saturated with information and countless stories seeking, what makes a particular narrative stand out and resonate with a diverse audience? Consider Dave Chappelle’s humorous yet incisive commentary on the Jussie Smollett incident during his Netflix special “Sticks & Stones.” Chappelle’s approach transcends the traditional boundaries of comedy, delving into the realms of societal critique and public discourse. In this performance, Chappelle does not just make people laugh; he makes them think, question, and reconsider their perceptions of truth and media. The significance of studying Chappelle’s narrative strategy lies in understanding how comedians like him utilize their platform to influence public opinion

Here, Chappelle acknowledges that stories are similar to propaganda, used to control and persuade their group members to benefit (Storr, 2020). This anecdote elicits laughter while subtly inviting the audience to consider the complexities and frustrations of law enforcement officers who navigate such high-profile cases. Gringe-Pemble (2001) states that depictions and anecdotes can influence the significance of language in shaping policy and social changes. By flipping the typical narrative on its head—evoking sympathy for the police in this context—Chappelle encourages the audience to reassess their preconceptions and biases, illustrating the power of anecdotal evidence to shift perspectives. Chappelle’s strategic use of anecdotal evidence in his comedy special serves as a powerful rhetorical tool, enhancing his ability to discuss serious topics with depth. This approach uses the effectiveness of anecdotes in comedy to foster a deeper connection and understanding between the comedian and the audience, showing humor as a vehicle for commentary and