ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Doublespeak

1742 Words7 Pages

Lutz’s unique style in this essay helps reveal his message about the dangers of doublespeak. He sets up his essay with a distinguishing style in order to develop his purpose - to not only help people to recognize doublespeak but to also oppose the dangerous aspects of it.
Lutz begins his essay with examples of doublespeak. All the examples, “pavement deficiencies” for potholes, “revenue enhancement” for taxes, and “fiscal underachievers” for the lower class, are specific to a common situation that everyday people find it easy to relate to. Additionally, Lutz does not blatantly reveal his purpose in this introduction. He simply states the examples with a minorly sarcastic tone. This tone subtly exposes his viewpoint of the topic of doublespeak. …show more content…

It makes the audience question why Lutz is referring to the poor as “fiscal underachievers” and the robbery as an “unauthorized withdrawal. After these numerous examples , readers can figure out that he is ridiculing any authority who establishes this kind of language. Lutz keeps his perspective of doublespeak limited in the introduction paragraph. He does not introduce any arguments or any reaction to the examples of doublespeak except for the sarcasm. This is crucial to establishing a connection to his audience. If Lutz introduced his complete argument and thesis against doublespeak in the introduction, the essay would not be as appealing. If he started off the essay with the second paragraph, which begins with the definition of doublespeak, the essay would have no appeal to the readers. Moreover, Lutz has a biased definition of doublespeak. He states that doublespeak makes “the unpleasant seem attractive”, “shifts responsibility”, and “limits it (thought)”. This is bias because this definition omits the positive part of doublespeak, euphemism, that Lutz mentions later in the essay If this paragraph served as the introduction of this essay, not only would it …show more content…

For example, in the 4th and 6th paragraphs, he switches to second person perspective, the most personal of the three point of views. This personal questioning of the audience makes the audience ponder about his ideas. While the 4th paragraph is more general about identifying doublespeak, the 6th paragraph’s use of the word ‘you’ makes the audience think of a time when they used euphemism. Lutz describes euphemism as a positive use of doublespeak as it is used in order to make a conservation sound respectful. Lutz is stating to the audience that the way that they use doublespeak is correct and acceptable. Of course, when you tell someone that what they are doing is correct, they are going to be more open to your perspective. This adds to Lutz’s connection to the audience and increases Lutz’s credibility in the eyes of the audience as he is also agreeing with something the audience agrees with - the acceptable use of doublespeak as euphemisms. This is because of the belief that if someone agrees with one aspect of your ideas ( Lutz agreeing with the audience), then they are going to be more open to other ideas that you have ( Lutz’s other beliefs on doublespeak). Additionally, in the other subsections about different types of doublespeak, Lutz places the blame on professionals, big corporations, and the government. This is a easily believable claim due to the fact that Lutz is not

Show More
Related
215 Words | 1 Pages

The purpose of this paper is that William Lutz believes that the American society have produced words (doublespeak) that have a double meaning that hide or mislead the truth. He uses descriptive writing to tell his story in this essay. Companies use these words to their advantage to evade information that would stain their company reputation. Lutz poses the question "How many kind of "chiefs" are there?"

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

In his essay “The World of Doublespeak,” William Lutz define doublespeak as “a blanket term for language which makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant attractive, or at least tolerable” (2013). Lutz goes on to claim “It is language which avoids, shifts, or denies responsibility” (2013). He explains the purpose of doublespeak is to “mislead, distort, deceive, inflate” (2103). Based on many of his examples, such as wording an airplane as an airplane that has had “uncontrolled contact with the ground,” or referring to a city slum as the resident of the “fiscal underachievers,” I feel he may overstate his own definition of doublespeak. While, the play on words in these examples does attempt to deceive the read and

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

Brent staples uses rhetorical devices within his persona and the emotion he wants to establish to support the message that stereotypes towards a certain group of people can alter how that group is generally percieved as by the rest of the world. Staples’ emotional appeal in his essay helps create the message by providing diction and imagery. Staples opens up with the saying that his “first victim was a woman” (Staples 542). The title “victim” makes Staples out to be a criminal who has hurt people, that is, until you begin to read on. Staples calls this encounter (along with his other encounters) the “language of fear” (Staples 542).

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Paraphrasing In my opinion, the purpose of the essay, “Life under the Chief Doublespeak Officer” the author, William Lutz shares a descriptive analogy of doublespeak words and terms used in this era by American businesses to manipulate. These words and terms are used everywhere from the corporate world, financial institutions to small independent businesses. One descriptive writing pattern used in this essay is compare the Unfamiliar to the Familiar where Lutz used buzzwords as “competitive dynamics” (unfamiliar) and provides a related word as “synergy” for an effective description of how doublespeak can be an effective, but eluded practice in business. He provides several examples in various lines of business of how common or established

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

He indicates that this rise in the price of steel would “increase the cost of homes, autos, appliances, and most other items for every American family,” (line 23), and “seriously handicap our efforts to prevent an inflationary spiral from eating up the pensions of our older citizens,” (line 27). In this short excerpt, Kennedy deliberately paints an image of Americans suffering due to this change in steel prices, wanting the American people to see the pain and anguish that these recent events will bring them. Accordingly, this stirring image of the elderly unable to receive pension due to the actions of the wealthy invokes a sense that an injustice was done to the people. To them, these steel companies have now unfairly increased steel prices in order to reap the benefits of the extra influx of cash while allowing others to suffer.

Read More
1647 Words | 7 Pages

For example, Young makes the comparison: “What if linguists were to codify the speech habits of gay men, identifying the stereotypical lisp as a common feature, highlighting the rhetorical importance of camp, insults, and undercutting among gays... And then what if they developed approaches for gay men to avoid speaking 'gay' in public, at school, and at work and restricted them only to speaking gay at home and among other gay people?” (Young 2009, p.60). By drawing a comparison such as this, he puts the audience in the uncomfortable position of comparing the stereotypical “lisp” of gay men to AAVE and other forms of speech minorities use. He then proceeds to ask if society should treat the “lisp” the same way AAVE is treated at school and institutions.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

People unintentionally fail at playing charades everyday by visually illustrating what they are trying to convey when they are speaking. People do not solely rely on words in communication with others, just as they do not fully rely on gestures to get their point across. In fact, the most skilled speakers use a wide variety of components of both verbal and nonverbal communication. A good way to observe this mixture of communication is watching interactions, and a convenient method to do so is to observe conversations in television shows. ABC’s comedy Fresh Off the Boat illustrates the Huang family dynamics through the use of clever communication motifs in the characters’ conversations throughout the episode, Time to get Ill in which the father, Louis, and his sons, Eddie, Emery, and Evan are left to their own devices after the

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

William Lutz’s calls double speak a blanket term for a language that pretends to communicate but does not. Double speak makes the bad seem good and the negative appear positive, or at least tolerable. Doublespeak avoids, denies, or shifts responsibility. It can conceal or prevent thought. Basic to doublespeak is incongruity, the incongruity between what is said, or left unsaid.

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

The purpose of this essay is to summarize, analyzes, and evolutions what Lutz discusses the dangers of doublespeak

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Her use of sarcasm and oxymorons challenge the audience’s sense of what is possible, which causes them to more deeply ponder the situation at hand. Florence Kelley wrote her speech with the intention of attacking the dangers of the country’s policies and in the hope of making a difference in the country’s

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

The Four Resources Model of Literacy model can be applied to Leon’s story, using the literary approach. 1) Code breaking: Although this begins with phonics decoding, it extends to syntax and language. By discussing the background knowledge of how words are spelled, how vocabulary is utilized and the word choices, it increases the background knowledge of the reader so that they may have additional background knowledge so that reading is easier. Within the literary approach, the teacher can use the setting, illustration, and language to assist in generating meaning of the words and the language that is utilized to provide additional information.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

In William Lutz’ “Doubts About Doublespeak”, the reader is given thorough explanations and examples of how doublespeak is used in society. He breaks down doublespeak into four different categories; euphemisms, jargon, gobbledygook and inflated language. The four of these types of doublespeak share the similarity that they are words or phrases that make something negative or bad sound good. Lutz doesn’t support the use of doublespeak and thinks of it as a deceiving approach to explain realities to people who can’t differentiate truth from carefully designed phrases. Giving the reader several examples of doublespeak that even the most detached person from society would understand was very well done by William Lutz in his article “Doubts about Doublespeak”.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

However, in parts of his speech Kennedy talks about how certain groups in the nation are working to help the people of America. For example in line 92 Kennedy talks about the Department of Defense. He talks about what they’re doing to figure out why the prices of steel are rising so quickly and what needs to be done to protect the public interest. By using positive and negative words Kennedy is able to make his opinion clear. The audience is able to see Kennedy’s negative opinion on the rising steel prices and his positive opinion on what different organizations are doing to help with the current steel crisis.

Read More
1932 Words | 8 Pages

Politicians serve as leaders of our country, and when one thinks of a leader, words like honesty, communication, and consistency should come to mind. But many politicians today seem to demonstrate the exact opposite of these qualities. The word politician, has seemingly taken on a negative connotation, and this is because of the way many politicians win their elections. Gone are the days where politicians received nicknames such as Honest Abe or The Man of People. For example, you will not hear most people going around saying Honest Nixon or Honest Clinton when talking about today’s politics.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

Euphemism is defined as words that express more polite term in order to be inoffensive to people. People do not want to offend other people. Euphemism is a tool that “is embedded so deeply in our language that few of us, even those who pride themselves on being plain-spoken, ever get through a day without using them," (Rawson, 1981:1). All people need to use euphemism and cannot avoid it. Euphemism has been combined in their daily life.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Doublespeak

Related Topics

Open Document