Rhetorical Analysis Of How To Tame A Wild Tongue
Rhetorical Analysis on Anzaldua’s How to Tame a Wild Tongue The passage How to Tame a Wild Tongue is a very defensive and straightforward argumentative essay which defends her language and the people who speak it against the discrimination that the author herself has experienced first hand (Ethos). From this text we can infer that the author is most likely from hispanic descent as she is speaking spanish a lot of the time throughout the text. This text mainly speaks about the discrimination many Mexican-Americans suffer because they are spanish speaking.
Gloria Anzaldúa, in the essay “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” (1987), claims her experiences as a Chicano taught her that her culture was not looked at highly in comparison to the English language. Anzaldúa argues her view about her Chicano language by giving examples of both cultures Chicano Mexican and American cultures. Anzaldúa’s purpose is to inform her audience on how it is to grow up in a Chicano speaking family. Anzaldúa writes in a frustrating tone throughout the story of her life experiences. Thesis: Anzaldúa use of her personal experiences, and Music, Film and Literature are relevant sufficient and
In How to Tame a Wild Tongue, Gloria Anzaldua uses rhetoric and personal anecdotes to convey and persuade her argument that Latin Americans are forced to relinquish their cultural heritage, and to conform to white society. The evidence she provides comes in a variety of platforms, both literal and rhetorical. Rhetorical, being through emotional, logical, and credible appeals through her text. Literal being explicitly stated, without any further analysis necessary. When she utilises the modes of appeals, they are subtle within the texts, which leads the reader to analyse as they read.
Written by Gloria Anzaldua, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, is an opinion easy , a retrospection of her past and a story about identity and recognition of a wild tongue. The following is a rhetorical analysis and personal response of this easy . My analysis will be divided into 4 separate parts including intended audience, main claim, purpose and situation. (a) Intended audience : The first thing that anyone who even skims through this easy would notice is Anzaldua’s multi-lingual language use.
Anzaldua writes about her Spanish and how it is to others. She explains the major things to her, but breaks it down piece by piece. Some will understand how she tries to explain herself, but it all depends on the person. She describes that her Spanish is different compared to the other Hispanic races. Anzaldua states, “Chicano Spanish is a border tongue which developed naturally” (35).
My Rhetorical Analysis Language is a part one’s identity and culture, which allows one to communicate with those of the same group, although when spoken to someone of another group, it can cause a language barrier or miscommunication in many different ways. In Gloria Anzaldua’s article, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, which was taken from her book Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, she is trying to inform her readers that her language is what defines her. She began to mention how she was being criticized by both English and Spanish Speakers, although they both make up who she is as a person. Then, she gave convincing personal experiences about how it was to be a Chicana and their different types of languages. Moreover, despite the fact that her language was considered illegitimate, Anzaldua made it clear that she cannot get rid of it until the day she dies, or as she states (on page 26) “Wild tongues can’t be, they can only be cut out.”
Whether through art or language, representations of identity ensue from processes that communicate what manners of being are considered culturally valid within a society. The expression of these expected conditions of existence depends on normative forms of social conditioning, and it is from within this fixed set of self-reproducing actions that hegemonic apparatuses possess power over people. Owing to an ideological foundation situated among various terms pioneered by Gloria Anzaldúa in her piece titled Borderlands/La Frontera, José Esteban Muñoz develops an ability to comprehend how the performance of intersubjective queerness disturbs essences of normativity, and comforts those who disidentify with mainstream perception. The following concepts
He shows this through his many experiences with bilingual court and education. At the end of his essay, Espada concludes with a basic summary of what he has learned. Espada claims “The repression of Spanish is part of a larger attempt to silence Latinos, and, like the crazy uncle at the family dinner table yelling about independence or socialism, we must refuse to be silenced.” Through the summary the reader understands despite English being the prevalent language the in the U.S. today the Spanish culture is still being preserved through bilingualism. On the other hand Rodriguez argues that in order to gain a public identity, one must be willing to sacrifice some part of their own cultural identity.
Although the previous chapter mention the situation of judging and attempt to remove Chicano Spanish, the “Chicano Spanish” section explain the evolution of her culture and how the author presents her language to society through the use of comparison, repetition, and code switching. Anzaldúa explains the dialect of the Chicano Spanish on what words the change or have in common with other languages. She continuously says “We leave out… We also leave out…We don’t use…We don’t say,” to represent the Chicanos as a whole and how they developed their identity into a language as a way to different from the other types of Spanish. However, throughout Anzaldúa’s essay, she states her opinion or facts in Spanish with a translation, which is known as code-switching,
Growing up, I never believed I had an identity. When I delve back to my earliest of memories, both English and Spanish made an appearance in my dialogue. Because my life had always remained constrained in a blend of American and Mexican culture, it was difficult to distinguish exactly which group I resonated most with. Here in the Rio Grande Valley, it is an internal war that is fought constantly. Whoever could predominantly show their Mexican heritage would be held at a great regard for not neglecting their roots.
Gloria Anzaldua gives respect to the importance of language and its everyday use. In her own way, specifically with focus on the Chicano tongue, she is able to redefine the true values and meanings that language holds. There, however, is something that goes much deeper and beyond what is superficially written on the pages. Through a lens of Kwame Appiah’s “Racial Identities,” Anzaldua’s essay can be ‘decode,’ and the true significance of language can be reestablished.
What makes a piece of writing effective? A piece of writing includes many things that make it effective, such as the style that appeals to the reader and rhetorical devices used in the writing that make it much more interesting. In this piece of writing titled “ How to tame a wild tongue “ includes many of these things. Even starting with the title it makes me curious as to what the piece will be about. There are two devices Anzaldua uses effectively in her essay which are anecdotes and parallel structure.
I chose Mexican-Spanish because I would like to explore more deeply about these contrasts of these languages. In this essay, I will explain some of dissimilarity on phonetics and phonologies between these two dialects, Colombian Spanish and Mexican Spanish. In some Spanish dialects the pronunciation of the consonant “ll” and “y” is quite similar. For native speakers, we unconsciously differentiated these two consonants as a separate phoneme.
The mix of Spanish and English words throughout the
We know that what he has written is based on years of observation – thus the inductive argumentation. With all that in mind, we can apply the rhetorical pentagon to the text. The text argues the pros and cons of Spanglish, and gives us a better understanding of its origins The writer is The target group Silvana Paternostro consists of everyone Journalist with a relation to Spanglish The text is optimistic and has a clear message Spanglish is a growing language in America
More about Rhetorical Analysis Of How To Tame A Wild Tongue
Rhetorical Devices In How To Tame A Wild Tongue
929 Words | 4 PagesGloria Anzaldúa How To Tame A Wild Tongue Thesis
102 Words | 1 PagesRhetorical Devices In How To Tame A Wild Tongue
1167 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of How To Tame A Wild Tongue
1343 Words | 6 PagesWhat Does Anzaldua Mean When Spanish Is A Border Tongue
942 Words | 4 PagesHow To Tame A Wild Tongue Rhetorical Analysis
1356 Words | 6 PagesLa Frontera Gloria Anzaldúa Analysis
1171 Words | 5 PagesEspadas Bilingualism
601 Words | 3 PagesChicano Spanish By Anzaldúa
268 Words | 2 PagesPersonal Narrative: My Identity In Rio Grande Valley
283 Words | 2 PagesWild Tongue
1827 Words | 8 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In How To Tame A Wild Tongue
469 Words | 2 PagesSpanish Vs Mexican Dialect Essay
881 Words | 4 PagesMericans By Sandra Cisneros Summary
529 Words | 3 PagesSpanglish Language Analysis
852 Words | 4 Pages