ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of They Might Sound Gross But Intestinal Worms

437 Words2 Pages

In the article, “They might sound gross, but intestinal worms can actually be good for you”, written by Dr. William Parker, the associate professor of surgery at Duke University. Parker successfully builds his argument by using ethos, plenty of logos, and counter arguments to persuade his audience that intestinal worms are beneficial to your overall health. Dr. Parker uses ethos, evidence based on his reputation, to show that he knows what he is talking about. Parker states that “part of our study [implying that he has a lab] included a survey of helminth users” He starts off this article by putting himself on a pedestal so the audience him will trust him more and what his claims are. He also mentions multiple times that “working with Duke University” and “My laboratory began work a few years ago, looking for the sociology of “helminthic therapy.””. By doing this, Parker associates himself with a creditable university, Duke being one of the top biological and environmental science schools in the nation. …show more content…

Dr. Parker “recently showed that the presence of helminths in pregnant rats protects the rat pups from inflammation. In other words, it seems that the mom’s helminths can protect her unborn babies” He references his own research to support his claim that intestinal worms aren’t bad for you at all. Another study he found that “helminths have been found to protect laboratory animals from a wide range of allergies and autoimmune conditions.” He is suggesting that with this research, that helminths could have the same effects on humans that they have on helminths. Most people are most willing to accept arguments when there is factual evidence to back it up. Most this article is filled with claims backed up by research and

Show More
Related

Summary Of They Might Sound Gross But Intestinal Worms By William Parker

566 Words | 3 Pages

In Dr. William Parker’s article “They might sound gross, but intestinal worms can actually be good for you”, he builds an argument to persuade his audience that intestinal worms can actually be used to benefit humans. Parker uses results and statistics from scientific studies, appropriate word choice, and credibility of sources to build his argument and persuade his audience that intestinal worms can benefit humans. Parker makes use of results and statistics from scientific studies. For example, he says “In controlled studies in humans, helminths were shown to halt the progression of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and effectively treat many individuals with inflammatory bowel disease with report of adverse side effects.”

Read More

Carl Zimmer's Parasite Rex

316 Words | 2 Pages

This book shows just how powerful and dangerous parasites can be, and it raises the question, “How dominant of a force are these parasites?” In the beginning, there is a prologue, which introduces the author and

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Brian Deer's Article

144 Words | 1 Pages

Though the tone used is not like common medical research journals, the argument made is still justified

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Intestinal Worms By Dr. William Parker

1003 Words | 5 Pages

Author and known Professor of Surgery at Duke University, Dr William Parker has made an argument in his article “.... But Intestinal Worms can be good for you, ” he establishes his argument of why worms can help people in a medical sense by appealing to the audience by using modes of persuasion, colloquial language and rhetorical questions, and positive connotations and repetition, as well as author's purpose. To begin with, Parker utilizes modes of persuasion by appealing to the audience with ethos, pathos, and logos. Parker first introduced at the beginning of the third paragraph in his article by appealing to ethos, a sense of credibility by referring to his “lab “ and his research as a form to make them believe that he is a professional.

Read More

Analysis Of Two Years Are Better Than Four By Liz Addison

652 Words | 3 Pages

There is no evidence. No numbers, percentages, statistics, graphs, studies, reports. As part of evidence, expert testimony is considered, and the only expert testimony available is what Mr. Perlstein is quoted as saying; he can not be the only expert cited. With both Perlstein and Addison’s claims only being backed up by their own college experiences, both the evidence and expert testimony of this article is weak.

Read More

The Erroneous Incarceration And Outcast Of Amanda Knox

860 Words | 4 Pages

No one wants to read the sciency report as to why some beauty product works a certain way, they just want to hear reinforcing anecdotes. Having been born in 2004, and not really all that interested in what the news says daily, I never heard of this until it was assigned to me. That is probably why I can hold an uncaring opinion on the matter. My thoughts were not brought up with bias, they were brought up with hindsight and the facts spread before

Read More

Analysis Of Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell

1305 Words | 6 Pages

[pivoting] deceptively around various anecdotes and studies that are selective in the extreme”.

Read More

Boom Times For Breakfast Summary

978 Words | 4 Pages

4) Does the information seem well-researched or is it unsupported? Justify your

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Eating Lobster

897 Words | 4 Pages

Most people don't know that eating food releases a sensation in the brain, and thats why people are so quick to fall in love with food. A food that has consistently wowed people with its delicate taste is the Maine lobster. Although many people enjoy it as a meal it has continued to cause controversy because of its inhumane way of being cooked. In 2004 David Foster Wallace argued that those who eat lobster overlook that it is a living creature “Consider the Lobster”. Throughout the article Wallace used rhetorical techniques to argue his point.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinct Animals

432 Words | 2 Pages

The aouthor is disagrring why we should not bring back exinct anoimals. The reason he is disagreeing against exinct animals is because in one of his paragraphs he says,”Health: Species could carry retroviruses or pathogens when brought back to life.” This is a very big point because we don’t know what exinct animals carry and what can of diesese it has. We don’t know if we can handel these dieses or even have the right medicene.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Food

1040 Words | 5 Pages

Rhetorical analysis Do you believe in order to understand other culture you need to try different food ? These are some ideas of this article from Amy S. Choi a freelance journalist. She wrote this article,“What americans can learn from other food cultures”. Choi betters her argument by providing real stories from other countries.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Consider A Lobster

1443 Words | 6 Pages

“Everyone knows what a lobster is. As usual though there’s much more to know than most of us care about – it’s all a matter of what your interests are” (Wallace 460). Novelist and essayist David Foster Wallace was the Roy E. Disney Professor of Creative Writing at Pomona College until he died in 2008. Wallace is best known for writing dazzling journalistic pieces, short stories and novels. In his 2005 article “Consider the Lobster and Other Essays”, Wallace brings it to the attention of people that lobsters are the one creature that are usually cooked while still alive.

Read More

Examples Of Healthcare Disparities

103 Words | 1 Pages

There are many healthcare disparities involving parasitic infection. One disparity, for example, is that any one can get parasitic infection, it is so easy to be infected by a parasitic infection. Also, to really prevent one from getting a parasitic infection, they would have to be extremely cautious on the food they are eating and the water they are drinking. It is more common in regions of tropical or subtropical to avoid getting infected. We can also get infected through our pets and the disparity in this is that its hard to keep up with everything to avoid getting infected with parasitic

Read More

Dr William Parker Analysis

824 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, They might sound gross, but intestinal worms can actually be good for you, Dr. William Parker, an associate professor of surgery at Duke University, provides an in-depth analysis on the benefits of helminths, or worms. Dr. Parker argues that helminths are actually quite beneficial as opposed to what people may think based on the connotation of the word parasite. He strives to persuade the audience that the helminths supply a valuable symbiosis within its host. Dr. Parker utilizes certain conventions to support his claim and persuade the audience. In the article, he uses explanation of evidence, reasoning of ideas, and the use of stylistic and persuasive elements to educate and coax the audience.

Read More

Medical Research: Multiple Causes Of False

950 Words | 4 Pages

Over the years, numerous claimed scientific findings have been proven false by researchers who tried to replicate them, or to test their feasibility. In fact, it appears that claimed scientific findings are often just the result of chance or biases; no true relationship existing between the studied variables. The article explores the multiple causes of false positive findings, from sampling, to data analysis through research design and more. The author found that most claimed research findings are false because the majority of them are based on a single study. Major causes of false findings are biases that can be noticed from sampling, data collection, data analysis and even shifting of the initial hypothesis once the data are obtained.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of They Might Sound Gross But Intestinal Worms

Related Topics

Open Document