Rhetorical Analysis Of Trump's Speech

637 Words3 Pages

The designated survivor for this speech was David Shulkin, the United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Overall, throughout his speech, Trump was greeted with generous applause from the Republicans and minimal applause from the Democrats. There were however some issues to which both parties agreed and applauded too. The Democrats also booed Trumps at times, such as when he spoke on immigration. The Democrats and the Republicans both applauded when Trump spoke about building their pipelines with American steel, children breaking our cycle of poverty, his backing off the police, his goals to defeat ISIS, and several of his stories, that included an African Women being the first to graduate from college and someone who survived a disease. Both parties also applauded when Ryan Owens, a veteran who died in the Yemen raid, was being honored. They also applauded when Trump talked about civil rights and the attacks on different groups such as the Jews. The Republicans were the only party to cheer when Trump talked about immigration, withdrawing from the TPP, his Supreme Court pick, …show more content…

I also liked his emphasis on helping women entrepreneurs have equal opportunity to start their financial career. Moreover, I also thought he had a good moment when he spoke about ending lobbying and therefore in our government. However, Trump’s worst moment was when he spoke about his plan to start a new program called VOICE, Victims of Immigrant Crime Engagement. This program seemed eerily similar to plans held by prior dictators in our world, and looked to target immigrants. Essentially, this program would release lists of immigrants who committed crimes. This is only going to create more difficulties for immigrants as they will face heightened racism as a result of Trump magnifying the wrongdoings of a