Rhetorical Analysis Of Why The Best Kids Books Are Written In Blood

637 Words3 Pages

In the article, “Why the Best Kids Books are Written in Blood”, the author uses rhetorical devices to contend that young adult books shouldn’t be censored/banned. When the author asserts that young adult books shouldn’t be censored, he sues Pathos by stating that young adult books give students ways to cope and give hope to their lives. He explains, “I read books about monsters and monstrous things, often written in monstrous language because they taught me how to battle the real monsters in my life.” (Alexie, 25) The rhetorical device, pathos, was used to persuade the reader by explaining how young adult books help young students connect with other people's experiences. Young adult books containing explicit topics guide students on how to mentally and physically deal with their problems. Later in the article, Sherman Alexie adds to his argument by addressing how other students feel. Sherman …show more content…

It made him question what problems millionaire kids would have, The response made the author realize the impact young adult books have on students' overall lives, “Yes, he was old enough to die and kill for his country. But according to Ms. Gurdon, he might be too young to read a young adult novel. Alexie, 20) The continuous use of pathos serves to sway the reader that all blocks are a gateway to their dreams, freedom, and imagination for anyone, no matter their background. Students have various problems, and they can only overcome them by gaining inspiration to guide them through them. Moreover, in the article, Sherman Alexie uses the rhetorical device, anecdotes, to provide stories that connect with the readers. In his letter, the author