Robert Monk And The Damascus Chronicle Of The Crusades

1146 Words5 Pages

Djouna Previle Professor Janis Gibbs History 218 March 4, 2024 The Crusades The Crusades, a series of religious and military expeditions initiated by Pope Urban II’s call in 1095, hold a significant place in history. These campaigns aimed to reclaim Jerusalem from Muslim control and secure Christian access to holy sites. The perspectives of Robert Monk, as seen in Pope Urban II Preaches the Crusade, and Ibn al-Qalanisi, as reflected in The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades both differ when it comes to the Crusades. By examining their accounts, we gain insights into their motivations, how both sides view each other, and the consequences that this war brought. Urban framed the Crusades as a righteous cause, emphasizing the need to assist fellow …show more content…

For him, the defense of Islam and the sanctity of Jerusalem were paramount. His chronicle reflects the besieged perspective, emphasizing the urgency of protecting their faith. He highlights atrocities committed by the European forces, including massacres and desecration of religious sites. The Seljuks also believed that Jerusalem belonged to them and that the Franks had no right over the Holy Land. They believed that God was on their side in the war, he gave them victories and “cast down the infidels”. Muslim scholars and leaders often justified their resistance against the Crusaders as a holy war sanctioned by God. They believed that their defense of sacred lands, such as Jerusalem, was a religious duty. The concept of divine intervention played a significant role. Muslims saw themselves as agents of God, defending their faith and heritage against foreign aggression. Muslim sources did not recognize the term “Crusades” as such. Instead, they viewed the events as repeated waves of Frankish aggression against the Muslim world. By the time Pope Urban II rallied the Crusaders in 1095, Christians were already gaining territory in Sicily and …show more content…

However, when the Muslims saw how much of a threat the Franks posed, their fear increased. The fact that they both viewed each other in such brutal and inhumane ways played a major role in the consequences of the Crusades. The Crusades resulted in massive loss of life on both sides—Christians and Muslims. According to Qalanisi, “the number of men, women, and children killed, taken prisoner, and enslaved from its population is beyond computation.” The Muslims also killed “a great number” and “showed no mercy” to the Franks who fell into their hands during King Da’ud b. Sulaiman b. Qutulmish’s reign.The fact that death and destruction of cities occurred shows how deep faith goes. Sometimes, people will take drastic measures to pursue what they believe in. Both the Muslims and the Crusaders took drastic actions to claim Jerusalem because both believed that Jerusalem belonged to them and both viewed the other as incorrect by default. They might have had different ways of getting followers and justifying their ways, but the Crusades resulted in death, loss, and