ipl-logo

Roth V. United States Case Summary

963 Words4 Pages

Case: Roth v. United States (1957) Facts: Samuel Roth was convicted in New York in a federal criminal case of violating the Comstock Act. He owned a mail order book business and was prosecuted for violating the law of using the US Postal service for mailing obscene material. He was convicted of mailing obscene advertisements and an obscene book. His appeal to the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals was denied, but Judge Jerome Frank gave a dissenting concurrence. Judge Frank requested that the US Supreme Court accept the case in order to clarify obscenity laws in his explanation (Strub, 2013). The case was accepted by the US Supreme Court by Writ of Certiorari and combined with a similar case of Alberts v. California in which State laws regarding obscenity were being challenged. Issue: The question the US Supreme Court was asked to decide was whether or not the Federal Comstock Act and similar Califonia State law violate First Amendment rights of freedom of speech. Specifically for Roth, was the Comstock Act unconstitutional? Holding: (Vote: 6-3) No: Obscenity is not a protected type of speech under the First Amendment. Majority Reasoning: …show more content…

Application: The Court’s rule regarding the constitutionality of the Comstock Act and other State Statues regulating obscenity is stated as, “We hold that obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press” (Roth, 1957, p. 485). Since obscenity was determined to not be protected under the First Amendment, this affirmed the lower court’s ruling. Justice Brennan sought to further clarify obscenity without facilitating censorship (Strub, 2013). His furthered clarification of the Hicklin test of what can be described as obscenity and how courts can legally differentiate the obscene from the non-obscene with due process (Alexander, 2008). This definition, or test, was used by lower courts and the US Supreme Court until it was replaced by Brennan himself in Miller v California, 1973 (Gaede,

Show More
Related

Griswold Vs Connecticut Case Study

212 Words | 1 Pages

The appellants claimed that the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1879 violated the Fourteenth Amendment and couple’s right to privacy. Issue: Did the Connecticut statue violate the Fourteenth Amendment, and did the Constitution therefore protect the privacy of married couples? Decision of the Court: The Supreme Court did rule the the Connecticut statue was indeed unconstitutional

Read More

United States Vs. Miller Case Study

1959 Words | 8 Pages

This case is also regularly cited in other Supreme Court cases and is often a deciding factor. It has been used in cases like Konigsberg v. State Bar “That view, which of course cannot be reconciled with the law relating to libel, slander, misrepresentation, obscenity, perjury, false advertising, solicitation of crime, complicity by encouragement, conspiracy, and the like, is said to be compelled by the fact that the commands of the First Amendment are stated in unqualified terms: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . . . " But as Mr. Justice Holmes once said: "[T]he provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic living institutions transplanted from English soil.

Read More

Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition Case Study

547 Words | 3 Pages

Citation: Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 535 U.S. 234 (2002) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Facts: The Free Speech Coalition which is a non-profit trade association of the pornography and adult entertainment industry in the United States filed suit, against the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The child pornography prevention act prohibits and sets penalties for activities such as depicting any visual image of the sexual abuse of minors. This includes pictures, video, and even modified images with the likeness or appearance of a minor engaging in a sexual act. The Promotion, advertisement, and distribution of such works are also prohibited and have consequences.

Read More

Was The Dixie Chicks Statement Protected By The First Amendment?

1130 Words | 5 Pages

It also made it illegal to try to “[obstruct the] production in support of war efforts.” In addition to avoid internal conflicts during war time, the bill was passed as a response of fear to the rise of communism overseas. A U.S. Supreme Court case, Schenck v. United States, which concluded with the Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. stating that the actions of Schenck, who was passing anti-draft pamphlets to young men, that his actions would intend the crime of sedition and created a “clear and present danger.” This also led to the standard of the bad tendency test in which the inclination of the speech was to promote an illegal action. In 1951 shortly after the World War II, several Communists were tried by the United State Supreme Court.

Read More

Lange V. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange)

122 Words | 1 Pages

In the case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange), the High Court ruled that as the development of the common law in Australia cannot run counter to constitutional imperatives, the common law rules of qualified privilege should properly reflect the requirements of ss 7, 24, 64, 128 and related sections of the Australian Constitution. Freedom of speech is not absolute. This can be seen in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution whereby it has been held not to protect all speech like obscene publications or speech inciting imminent lawless action. Australian common law has long recognised limitations to free speech, for instance, those in relation to the criminal law of incitement and conspiracy, and in obscenity

Read More

Argumentative Essay: The Case Of Miller Vs. California

604 Words | 3 Pages

In June 21, 1973, Miller was convicted on the ground of advertising the sale of what was considered by the court as adult material. He was found guilty as he broke the California Statute. The California Statute forbids citizens from spreading what is considered offensive in societal standards. The question that was being asked was that if the action of Miller was Constitution thus is protected under the law. However, he lost the case due to a vote of 5 - 4.

Read More

Summary Of A Cheerleader's Vulgar Message

1195 Words | 5 Pages

In the text, “A Cheerleader’s Vulgar Message” the author, Adam Liptak, the Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, argues that the court case Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. The Supreme Court involving a 9th grade student in Pennsylvania that didn't make the varsity cheer squad and posted vulgar language with her friend on social media to show her frustration and getting punished for a whole year from cheer was a controversial topic and presents both sides. Liptak shows one side of the argument by stating, “The court said the First Amendment did not allow public schools to punish students for speech outside school grounds.” This helps to prove the author's claim that this was a controversial topic because he is stating what the court's response to the case was and that this is also improving his credibility because he uses the First Amendment to show why the court thinks the school was in the wrong for the students'

Read More

Lisa Simpson First Amendment Issues

1756 Words | 8 Pages

The concurrence of New York v. Ferber, establishes that it is possible for the depiction of porn or sexual acts to have a serious literary,

Read More

Do You Think Plaintiff That Freddie Is A Private Figure Under US

2489 Words | 10 Pages

While prior restraint is generally disfavored under the First Amendment, courts have recognized certain circumstances where restrictions on speech may be permissible. The relevant standard in this context is whether the student newspaper operates as a public forum, which would prohibit censorship. In Hosty v. Carter (2005), the 7th Circuit emphasized the importance of determining whether the

Read More

Let's Put Porn Back In The Closet Analysis

188 Words | 1 Pages

1. The Susan Brownmiller’s essay “Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet” is the debate between the First Amendment and pornography. There are also debates between what is obscene and what is used for educational purposes. Brownmiller believes that “…explicit sexual material has its place in literature, art, science and education” (62). Where literature broadens the mind with its descriptions and illustrations that words paint of the human body, art exposes children to what the human body looks like and satisfies their curiosity.

Read More

Censorship Of The First Amendment Essay

865 Words | 4 Pages

One of these cases is Patterson V. Colorado. Patterson published comics and articles about the Colorado Supreme Court. These comics criticized the judges of that court, and questioned many of their motives. Afterwards, Patterson was charged with contempt. He quickly moved to void the information by citing local law, the Colorado Constitution, and the Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution.

Read More

Freedom Of Speech In Debs V. United States

1197 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court has been entrusted with the task of interpreting the Constitution of the United States. In the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of speech serves as the foundational liberty which is the cornerstone to the practice of democracy. Commencing at the early part of the twentieth century cases such as Schenck v. United States, Debs v. United States, Abrams v United States, Whitney v. California, and Dennis v. United States, paved the way for the Court to set the legal standard for defining protected and unprotected speech. Nonetheless, the Court has struggled to interpret said boundaries property and has failed to protect speech in some of the above cases. This essay will analyze two different scenarios where the Court

Read More

Why People Should Be Censored

1405 Words | 6 Pages

Or, should we continue to censor things like people’s voices as well like how it is on tv. Do we allow for the government to have that power?. Or in fear of having your right to free speech being compromised do we let society have the power to control what is and is not considered to be acceptable?. This is an extremely controversial case just for that reason. And there have been several court cases around the issue and what should and should not be censored.

Read More

Difference Between Obscenity And Pornography

799 Words | 4 Pages

Obscenity, in terms, refers to, “any utterance or act that strongly 0ffends the prevalent morality of the time.” Derived from the Latin obscaena (offstage) a cognate of the Ancient Greek root skene, because some potentially offensive content, such as murder or sex, was depicted offstage in classical drama, the word can be used to indicate a strong moral repugnance. In other words, the word can also be said to mean “the character or quality of being obscene or any act, utterance, or item tending to corrupt the public morals by its indecency or lewdness.” Talking in legal terms, obscenity applies to anything 0ffensive to morals and is often equated with the term Pornography. But it is important to note that there is a line of difference between obscenity and pornography.

Read More

Obscenity In The Internet Essay

847 Words | 4 Pages

Obscenity, in terms, refers to, “any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.” Derived from the Latin obscaena (offstage) a cognate of the Ancient Greek root skene, because some potentially offensive content, such as murder or sex, was depicted offstage in classical drama, the word can be used to indicate a strong moral repugnance. In other words, the word can also be said to mean “the character or quality of being obscene or an act, utterance, or item tending to corrupt the public morals by its indecency or lewdness.” Talking in legal terms, obscenity applies to anything offensive to morals and is often equated with the term Pornography. But Pornography is a more limited term, which refers to the erotic content of books, magazines,

Read More

More about Roth V. United States Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document