ipl-logo

Rousseau's Attachment To The Socio-Political Nature Of Man

2077 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Jean-jacques rousseau political theory

When The Social Contract was first published in 1762, it was greeted with public outrage and government-run censorship, which eventually led to Rousseau being a wanted man. Nevertheless, the text was one of the leading scripts that sparked the French Revolution only 32 years later. Other researchers of this field have examined Rousseau’s work and established several conclusions towards the application of Rousseau’s political philosophy - which has raised the questions such as “Does Rousseau believe that man should live in solitude and without communication with his environment? What is Rousseau’s attachment to so socio-political nature of man?” Through critical inquiry, I take liberty in claiming that Rousseau believed that man would indeed …show more content…

In his definition of the state of nature, humans are free to do whatever they want, regarding our desires and impulses to be natural ant not tempered by reason. Physical freedom is apparent, but so is the lack of morality and rationality. In the end, Rousseau believed that this state of nature serves as a better environment for human beings than the “slavery” of ones society – only to be influenced by a governing party and other individuals participating. Furthermore, Rousseau repeatedly refers to humans as noble savages in the state of nature – essentially stressing that the lack of personal property would result in the lack of violence and problems. Once we have created the concept of personal property, we become greedy, we have an urge; we begin to want more things we need, thus resulting in societal problems such as slavery, tyranny, and the objectification of other human beings for our own gain. Correspondingly, it’s clear – Through The Social Contract, Althusser, and Levin’s interpretations, that Rousseau believes man is unable to return to the state of nature, considering man is constantly in a perpetual state of war within society. Rousseau repeatedly claims that the state of nature dissolves when human beings create property (which, in turn, inspired

Show More
Related
1878 Words | 8 Pages

“Where is it Written” by Adam Schwartz, is a story about a difficult relationship between Sam and his mother Sandra. First, Sam wanted his father to have full custody of him because he wanted to spend more time with him. Then, Sam remembers the conflicts he had with his mother. Finally, he realizes that his mother is not a bad person. Coming of age is in important theme in which an adolescent becomes mentally mature.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

In any case of failure to protect the rights, the people were in their complete right to overthrow the government (Doc 2 & Pg. 630) In agreement, Rousseau believed that the government’s power also comes from the consent of the people, which he included in his book, The Social Contract. (Pg. 632) Rousseau included much more ideas that incorporated political aspects, but he also his thought about

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

Rousseau demonstrated the importance of “rights as a community as a whole” regarding the different benefits in the hierarchical divisions found through the estates . This atmosphere of questioning how France was governed was a significant change in the pre-revolutionary

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

the power form of the majority. He believed that majority of equals leads to the creation of people abusing their powers. Lastly, as the Tocqueville’s likes, and dislikes were mentioned other great philosophers such as Rousseau of those times had a say on the equality in a country. The great philosopher Rousseau was a philosophical thinker who premise was on the collectivism of the majority than on an individual in a community. His social contract was designed for people to give away their rights for an exchange of governmental protection.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Perhaps we can eliminate the chains we have put upon ourselves, but societal institutions provide no incentives to do so. 5 Points 1. Rousseau emphasizes the illegitimate social power of domination and its source in economic inequality. The author takes the position that these issues are under authorized by political theories. 2.

Read More
1324 Words | 6 Pages

This paper examines both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and James Madison remark concerning ‘ factions ’ as the potential destructive social force to the society. To layout and examine, this paper will first outline and discuss on Rousseau’s understanding of factions in The Social Contract,and Madison’s discussion on factionalism in the Federalist Papers 10.But there are many component surrounded with their view’s on ‘factions’,so it is important to consider together. Firstly,I will consider the definition and the element surrounded with their view on factions. With regard to Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The Social Contract,he believes that the society can only function to the extent that people have interest in common.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout history, rebellions, revolts, revolutions, and movements have taken place all over the world. Not surprisingly, no one enjoys being governed or ruled by another person or country, which is when those revolutions and movements arise. Two of the most famous revolutions include the American and French Revolution. With these revolutions, both countries wrote their own Declarations: The American Declaration of Independence and The French Declaration of the Rights of Man. A not so popular document that is closely linked and similar to the American and French Declarations is The Social Contract written by Jean Jacques Rousseau, which was based on an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits.

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

In response to the British’s intolerable acts during this time people desired a government based on popular sovereignty or the idea that a government's power ultimately comes from the consent of the people. The political treatise "The Social Contract," written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, explores the idea that the people are sovereign and that the legal power of a state arises from the agreement of the governed in order to build a more stable and just society. In this work, Rousseau makes the case that the common good should serve as any society's guiding concept and that the government should be in charge of advancing

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

The idea that a contract is needed in any society in order to accomplish more and achieve greater individual security for the price of some of their rights and freedoms is prevalent in both Mills’ and Rousseau’s novels. On the contrary, White supremacy is an underlying theme throughout The Social contract, while Mills’ calls out Rousseau for objectifying “peoples of color” by ignoring them from the contract as a whole. Due to this detrimental difference in the two philosophers’ beliefs, I have to side with Charles Mills’ and his racial contract. When it is all said and done, Mills’ appropriately addresses the problem and respectfully finds a solution that is not offensive to certain

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Conclusion: In Jean Rousseau’s, “The Social Contract” he states that people are willing to give up individual freedom and be ruled by others but only if their rights, happiness, and property would be better protected under a formal government rather than an anarchic. We are here for this. We want to separate from Great Britain and be independent. We want to provide you with a government that provides you with all this. All we need is your help in fighting this war.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

What, according to Rousseau, were the worst effects of socialisation? Jeans-Jacques Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men is a defence of the original man in a state of nature and an attack on the corrupt and elitist European society of his day. Rousseau sought to ‘go back to an earlier point and try to piece together[… the] slow succession of events’ in order to pinpoint where humanity degenerated from the state of nature to today’s “civilised” society. In this sense, Rousseau seems to be attributing the process of socialisation to ‘all the evils’ in the world.

Read More
1648 Words | 7 Pages

“when I consider him, in a word, as he must have left the hands of nature, I see an animal less strong than some, less agile than others…” (Rousseau 40) Contrary to those described by Hobbes and Locke, Rousseau’s state of nature does not involve complex rational ideas, but rather simple instincts such as sympathy and self-preservation. The absence of things like violence and property from Rousseau’s state of nature implies that these problems are unnatural and are the product of society. Rousseau continues to state

Read More
2004 Words | 9 Pages

The French revolution and human nature A review of the literature Name School  Abstract The French revolution was a time of great change in France. It was sparked by rebellion and necessity for change.

Read More
1624 Words | 7 Pages

“This right does not come from nature, it is therefore founded upon convention”. Rousseau does not view society in the same light as Durkheim. He does not believe that society is the savior of humans and that there is no real self without it. Unlike Durkheim, Rousseau believes that the only natural society is the traditional family and that any other form is forged out of convention. Rousseau mentions that when parents are done raising their child and that child is no longer dependent, but chooses to stay then the family is together out if convention and is then unnatural.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

INTRODUCTION Jean Jacque Rousseau was born in the city state of Geneva, Switzerland in 1772. Rousseau is primarily known for major works like- The Social Contract, Emile, Discourse on the origin of Inequality, the Constitutional Project for Corsica, and Consideration on the Government of Poland. What makes Rousseau such an important figure in the history of philosophy is because of his contribution to both political and moral philosophies and his concept of ‘general will’, which also gained him a lot of criticism. Apart from his philosophical and political contribution, he was also a novelist, an autobiographer, botanist, composer and also a music theorist.

Read More

More about Rousseau's Attachment To The Socio-Political Nature Of Man

Related Topics

Open Document