ipl-logo

Sartre's Argument Essay: Does God Exist?

1021 Words5 Pages

Throughout life humans wonder whether God exists or not. Different societies have different beliefs on how humans came to be. However, everyone has the same questions, why were humans placed on this Earth? Is there a greater purpose in life or is it plain and humdrum? Some believe that humans are free to make their own choices, whereas others say that one must follow the path of a higher being. According to Sartre “man is condemned to be free. Condemned, because he did not create himself, yet, [he] is free; because, once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does” (Sartre 425). Sartre’s argument states that people are condemned because humans do not create themselves, however, they are allowed to choose who he or she becomes and what they do. Therefore, although humans may not have been the creators for his or her own existence, humans have the capability of being the creators for who they are after birth. Thus, unlike the belief that everything is set in stone once an individual is born, humans are granted the ability to control his or her own lives, and the freedom to determine what his or her purpose is. In life, people are told what to believe in and who to believe in, even if he or she does not agree. The dividing lines between good and bad decisions are separated by a very thin line that could easily be …show more content…

For example, a path of what God or a higher being has defined for us or a path that we as humans have created for ourselves. In other words, “not only is man what he conceives himself to be, but he is also only what he wills himself to be after this thrust towards existence” (Sartre 425). Therefore, everyone is faced with decisions that they must make every single day. Each choice being good or bad and chosen by one’s own free will. Every choice that one makes comes with an outcome, an outcome that one is stuck

Show More
Related
672 Words | 3 Pages

Destinys and Decisions “You are always only one decision away from a totally different life”(Unknown). Your destiny can be such a fragile thing, you slide between the path of success and the path of failure daily with the decisions you make. Often when you make a bad decision you are give a second chance. And these decisions and chances all lead up to your destiny.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever thought of how something 50 years old could still matter? Well, The Outsiders, by S.E. Hinton, still has significant reference today. The book is about 2 gangs that fight with each other because of class. Some examples of its relevance today are the reckless environment struck by economic catastrophe, the immature quarrels, and the uneducated and underprivileged gangs. This book describes the darker side of society, unmasking the truth.

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

We may not have complete control over our lives, but let us not fail to pay attention to our intuitions and our experiences of it. Many aspects go into deciding whether one is morally good or bad and ultimately can be traced back to

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

The human purpose is to have a personal relationship with God and to live by the way of the Bible. It is important to spread the word of the Lord. After Adam and Eve caused the fall to humanity pain and sin was introduced to the world. The root cause of human problems is sin. This is why it is important to try not to sin and live by the ways of the

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Sartre argues the idea of human nature without God and a “heaven of ideas”, because there is no God to create us according to his plan. Human beings just appear on the scene for no reason and cannot appeal to anything above them to give their lives meaning or direction. This concept is forlornness. In Sartre’s eyes, man must come to grips with the fact that he is alone in his decision making. He states by saying that humans occupy the ontological category of “the for-itself.”

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

In the play, “No Exit" Jean-Paul Sartre establishes the existential belief through the viewpoint and the experience that the three main character encounter in their lives: Garcin, Inez, and, Estelle. Sartre writes all of these characters with different personality and outlooks about their past life experience throughout the play. Additionally, Sartre has a particular setting in which all these three characters reside, a drawing-room, also associated with hell within the play. Throughout the play, all of the characters reside in hell to reflect on their past and pay their punishments for the immoral deeds they have executed on earth. Overall, It is through the use of characterization, symbolism, and simile Sartre conveys the central theme of

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

Sartre changes the conventional understanding of existentialism. Traditionally, existentialism is defined by the principle, “essence precedes existence”. Sartre changed this policy to “existence precedes essence” which is an outcome of atheism whereby God does not exist. He says that the difference between man and objects is that man has freedom while objects are only subjects of man’s actions. Sartre defends himself against his critics by elaborating the existence of man leading to reasons for his existence.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Two questions that will change as to how you think about your purpose and at some point have made a clash of brains in your system, “Am I determined?” or “Do I have a choice?” It’s funny how eager we are to grasp the answers to these mind-wrecking questions. In the world we are in, we are the illustrator and author of our own story and we are not chained to our past nor are we controlled by it but, what if? What if I tell you the exact opposite thing?

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

How are the characters ‘traps’ for each other? No exit, a play by Jean-Paul Sartre describes hell as a state of being, “hell is other people.” Garcin, Inez and Estelle all strangers to each other and from different parts of the world are put into a room together. Inez, Estelle, and Garcin exist in Hell to torment each other. As the layers of contemptibility are torn far from every one of them, they are uncovered and helpless before the others.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

One cannot control what happens to his or her own life - this is how fate impacts people’s lives - but one can control how he or she responds to events, showing that humans do have free will. If humans really choose their own values and essence, as Sartre postulates, then

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

That is our choice the way we live our temporary life and the way we make it meaningful for ourselves What is the meaning of life? Why we exist here? What are we living for? These questions are asked, discussed and argued by many philosophers around the world to look for a significance of people’s living or existence in general.

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

all of our decisions are all leading up to an end game not desired nor procured by our own will. This would mean that we have zero free will, that we have no meaning or purpose of our own, we are just pawns unwittingly going about our day. i like to think that there is nothing but my own desire shaping my future as well as those around me committing the same action. if i have no control of my life, then what is the point? i mise well just eat all day, not worry about anything, do what i want, and later on die.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

“Condemned to be free,” a quote from Jean- Paul Sartre, a atheistic existentialism philosopher who had a different view on human nature also known as existentialism. Sartre strongly believed that humans were free to create their own nature without a God, and were not made to have a purpose in life (pg. 67). I found this philosopher very interesting because I agree with believing that humans are fully responsible for their own actions. In addition, as Sartre stated, “we must suffer the anguish of own decision making and accept responsibility for its consequences,” which means that even though humans have the right to make their own choices, they also have to be responsible for the pain that comes along with it (pg.67). For example, someone who decides to kill another person out of their own free will.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

We, however, as a human being, tend to deny our free choice of life and try to avoid the responsibility for making our own decision. It is because we are often anxious about other’s opinions and criticism after we had made our own decision. We are always being fearful of criticisms from others rather than following our heart. Baggini used the idea of bad faith from Jean-Paul Satre to criticize people who tried to escape from the responsibility to create their own life’s meaning after experiencing the

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The argument Jean-Paul Sartre, a French philosopher, presents on existentialism helps to prove the foundation which is “existence precedes essence”. Existentialism is normally understood as an ideology that involves evaluating existence itself and the way humans find themselves existing currently in the world. For the phrase existence precedes essence, existence’s etymology is exsistere or to stand out while the term Essence means “being” or “to be” therefore the fundamental of existentialism, literally means to stand out comes before being. This can be taken into many different ideas such as individuals having to take responsibility for their own actions and that in Sartre’s case the individual is the sole judge of his or her own actions. According to him, “men is condemned to be free,” therefore “the destiny of man is placed within himself.”

Read More

More about Sartre's Argument Essay: Does God Exist?

Related Topics

Open Document