Science And Detriment In Frankenstein

197 Words1 Pages
The books with which I most vehemently disagreed was Frankenstein by Mary Shelly. In the novel, Frankenstein decides to build the perfect human in an attempt to play God; instead, his creation is actually a monster. Subsequently, this monster murders everyone Frankenstein loves in retaliation for Frankenstein rejecting him over his ugly appearance. I found this novel to be interesting, but I disagreed with its portrayal of science as being negative. It shows science as being evil when Frankenstein uses it to construct a monster which leads to his entire life being destroyed. However, the novel only illustrates the consequences of abusing science, not the many possible benefits that it could reap. Frankenstein taught me to consider the detriments