ipl-logo

Scientific Knowledge Changes Over Time

1007 Words5 Pages

How Can It Be That Scientific Knowledge Changes Over Time?

Scientific knowledge changes over time because of new knowledge acquired as a result of technological advancements, more research, experiments, etc. Intrinsic motivation may have contributed to advances in science. Changes in scientific experience also due to practical concerns such as illness, war, and need for fuel and food.
Although scientific knowledge changes over time, aspects of science do not change. For example, the scientific method has stayed more or less constant since its conception, Law of conservation of momentum and Law of cooling are applicable in all scenarios.
The Atomic theory went through many revisions before the way we know it today. Democritus created the idea …show more content…

This led to revolutions in the way people experimented and interpreted information in both areas. Through the development of technology, there has been an increase and change in scientific knowledge over time. Former beliefs of scientific knowledge (such as that of genetics and heredity) have been built upon and advanced to create the knowledge we have today Perception plays a large role in scientific knowledge and stimuli is received differently by every person, therefore creating an inevitable bias in all research. Reduction of researcher bias was introduced with new technology to aid scientific research. Scientists develop universal scientific terms and use Greek and Latin terminology to: avoid the misconceptions that can occur when vernacular languages are translated and to avoid needing to reference thousands of different terms for the same observed phenomenon. These laws, though proved inductively, have held true since their discovery. Are similar to mathematical axioms (fundamental truths) because they are supposed to represent aspects of the universe and because they are used to formulate hypotheses, like how axioms are used to support claims. Despite this, they still may be subject to change in the …show more content…

Infoplease, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
Buescher, Lee. "Atomic Structure Timeline." Atomic Timeline. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
Childs, Peter E. "John Dalton." Chemistry Explained. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
De Leon, Nelson. "Rutherford Model of the Atom." I. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
Iyer, Sabarish. "Quantum Mechanics." Socratic. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
Nave, R. "Quarks." Hyperphysics. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
"The Structure of DNA." Principles of Biology I. Bio2107 (Houghton '14), n.d. Web. 6 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --) .
"Watson and Crick." UIC. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2017. http://www.uic.edu/classes/bios/bios100/mike/spring2003/watsoncrick.htm>.
Yudell, Michael, and Rob DeSalle. "The History of Genetics." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2017. (-- removed HTML --)

Show More
Related
582 Words | 3 Pages

Phys.org - News and Articles on Science and Technology, 29 July 2011,

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

At thirty-five years of age, Nicholas has been pursuing the discipline of nuclear physics aiming to make an advancement in the field. However, through various circumstances, he abandoned his pursuit; currently, he is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Although being a professor was not his preliminary ambition

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

N.p., 9 Mar. 2012. Web. 12 July 2015. Mckee, Chris.

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

For instance, the scientific studies of Einstein and Newton are still valid whenever something needs to be proven or improved like technology, space exploration,

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

"Periodic Table of Elements." Periodic Table of Elements: Los Alamos National Laboratory. Department of Energy, 2016. Web. 25 June 2017.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Nov.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

(Emanuel and Fuchs, 2005). References Emanuel, E. & Fuchs, V. (2005). Solved! Washington Monthly, Vol.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Awakening, I immediately wrote it down on a piece of paper.” (Mendeleev, Dimitri). It’s amazing that what one dream brought along, is still followed in today’s day and age. Two weeks later, he published the second volume of his textbook named The Relation between the Properties and Atomic Weights of the Elements. When the scientific community got their hands on this newfound information, they were astounded!

Read More
2431 Words | 10 Pages

Web. 19 Oct. 2014. I used this because it summed up some of Einstein 's

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

(N/A). (N/A): (N/A). Retrieved 10 March 2015 from http://cstl-csm.semo.edu/cwmcgowan/ch181/atomhist.htm • Atomic theory timeline in Soft Schools.com. (2005-2015). (N/A): (N/A).

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

4000 years ago we saw the very first civilizations develop a system of writing, complex mathematics and invent the wheel. Today we have already sent exploration rovers to mars, and are looking to send people there within the next 10 years. With the first homo sapiens appearing 200000 years ago, it is quite amazing that most advancement in technology and science has happened in the past few thousand years. However the progression in science has not always increased at a steady rate. For example during classical antiquity, especially in Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire, scientists studied natural philosophy, the study of nature; which helped to progress our understanding of the world greatly.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

From there on many other scientists and philosophers came up with their own ideas and why the scientists who previously stated their beliefs were wrong. Anaximander didnt agree with Aristotle, Anaximenes didn't agree with Anaximander, Xenophanes didnt't agree with Anaximenes, and it goes on and on. Still today scientists are discovering new information that ultimately leads to modern facts to become irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that even though each person thinks their idea was more correct that the person before them, they still learned from one another. The only difference was that as time went on, more things were able to be proved and therefore led to certain pieces of

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

There were scientific findings before the 16th century and there were more to follow the 18th century. Shapin’s thesis covers that there was no specific scientific distinction between the 17th century and the rest of time for this period to stand out and be a revolution but he explains that the Scientific Revolution is more of a process. Shapin still believes that the scientific findings of this time can be considered revolutionary. Shapin explains that “Science remains whatever it is-certainly the most reliable body of natural knowledge we have got” (165) to show that he still understands how important science and the findings in science are to the world and civilization.

Read More
2359 Words | 10 Pages

The Epic Quest for a Quantum Theory of Gravity. This study is concerned with the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics into a theory of quantum gravity, which should also provide a consistent framework for incorporating the other fundamental forces in nature and additionally provide insight into moments before the Big Bang. 1. Introduction

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

In mathematics the knowledge we obtain is justified with reason that have straightforward theories and laws. In natural science on the other hand the information we collect is firstly obtained with observations which can be perceived in the wrong manner and then carried out wrong after that, in the natural world things are always changing therefore the results we get now won’t necessarily be correct one hundred years down the line therefore the knowledge we have now of the natural sciences is correct until proven wrong. Knowledge is trustworthy in most of our subjects at school but we can never know if the information we are receiving is 100% accurate or not because in the future we may learn that the information we have is

Read More

More about Scientific Knowledge Changes Over Time

Related Topics

Open Document