ipl-logo

Frege's Sense And Reference

811 Words4 Pages

Frege’s Sense and Reference is an excellent piece that engages the readers in a thoughtful process while trying to comprehend his arguments concerning philosophical logic and language. His approach involves the use of questions that give the readers the inherent objective of his study. Through the questions about identity and other aspects, he brought forth the law of truth, which is much different from human assertions and thoughts. In the book, the author explains to his audiences the explicit difference between sense and reference, and the way they apply to human speeches and sentences. This study is important in exploring the thoughts by Frege in his book and the way they make sense to the readers. Therefore, the study is significant in …show more content…

In the same pedestal, the book makes it profound that sense is possessed by a name, and this is not contingent on its reference. However, he argues that two or more signs can be used to refer to one thing, but its identity remains. He combines the three important items such as sign, sense, and object, which all have important roles to play in regards to sense and reference. Frege is not much interested in the truth of the used proposition but is more focused on what people do when making utterances in certain ways. More importantly, he argues that the reference to a sentence would not prove its truth-value. For instance, one would use a particular name to refer to a person or a thing, but the sense in which he or she expresses and comprehends that very sign would not be the same. For instance, if someone is pleased by a particular name, he or she would attach importance and apply positive depiction when using it to refer to an interesting thing or a person. On the other hand, when the name is unpleasant, the depiction would be …show more content…

Frege is more interested in understanding the way an object designated by a sign would relate to the meaning expressed by it. In this milieu, he states that the change in the sense changes that meaning of the very same sign. In other words, changes in the sense also change the expression of the sign. Importantly, Frege implies that the mode of presentation means a lot in a sign, which also corresponds to the sense contained in it. On the other hand, the change in the sense of a sign of an object may not affect its identity. The sense presented in an object is greatly autonomous to the identity of the object in question. The understanding that different signs may be used to designate the very same object is important in attaining more knowledge about it. It implies that more knowledge can be devoted to understanding one particular object in a more diversified

Open Document