More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination in schools from different perspectives
Gender separation in schools
Discrimination in schools from different perspectives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As an adult that has went through an educational program every official involved should have known that strip searching an eighth grade girl wasn’t right. I feel that every official involved in the strip search should have been held liable and at least hope that they were terminated by the school district. Implications I feel that this case set certain limitations on strip searches in the school setting. This case set clear guidelines on how an administrator should perform a search and whether or not the areas searched or justifiable for the situation.
Petitioner, Triniti T. (“Student” or “Petitioner”) filed her initial request for due process hearing (“Beaumont I”) on February 24, 2014. In the request, Petitioner alleged that the District denied Student a free, appropriate public education (“FAPE”). A hearing was held on June 24-26, 2014 and a Decision following due process hearing (“Decision”) was issues on August 28, 2014. The Decision found that Petitioner had met her burden in proving that the District failed to provide Student with a FAPE in specific areas and the Petitioner was entitled various relief including, but not limited to specific prospective placement, services, assessments, training, devices/equipment for the remainder of the 2014-2015 school year; program development for the 2015-2016 school year, and reimbursement
The legal dispute taking place here is a dissension between the applicability of the Tenth and the Fourteenth Amendments in the case of hair length regulations. The Fourteenth Amendment provides citizens with equal protection from the law in the case of state ordinances. The Tenth Amendment which provides the public official the freedom to operate the school under his jurisdiction in the way he deems premier, free from federal involvement. Step 3: Decision and reasoning by the judge
Bethel High School District 403 v. Fraser Matthew Fraser, a student studying at Bethel High school, gave a speech at a school assembly to nominate his friend as a candidate for student government. The speech contained many sexual references and innuendos, but no obscene content. Making his speech, Fraser was suspended from Bethel High school for three days. His parents appealed the school's decision and Washington Supreme Sourt agreed the his freedom of speech rights were contravened, the school board appealed the case to the Supreme Court.
Samantha Kubota’s “School Punished Teen Girl for Working Out in Sports Bra in 100-degree Texas Heat, ACLU Say” (2023) tells the story of a young female athlete. A teenage girl who participates in cross country and track at her high school got in trouble for wearing a sports bra during practice in 100-degree heat while her male counterparts were practicing shirtless. Furthermore, since G.H. wore a sports bra, she was denied the award of being the top runner on the girls’ cross-country team; this award would have been crucial for college recruiting and applications. The girl, who identifies by her initials G.H., requested help from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sent a letter to her high school stating the coaches, District officials, and employees violated the Fourteenth Amendment and Title IX of the Education Amendments by reinforcing a sex-stereotyped dress code and treating the girls’ and boys’ cross-country teams differently.
When the Des Moines School Board learned of the protest, they passed an anticipatory rule (Walsh, 2018). On December 14, 1965, school officials met and adopted a new policy. According to such policy, student
The court also found that the students did not lose their First Amendment right on school property. To justify this statement, school officials must be able to prove conduct is in question and that it would materially and substantially interfere with the school’s operations. As well, stated in a concurring opinion by Supreme Court Justice, Byron R. White noted that “the majority’s opinion relies on a separations between communication through action and communication through words” (Oyez). In contrast, the dissenting opinion stated by Supreme Court Justice, Hugo Black, “The First Amendment does not provide the right to express any opinion at any time. Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well with in its rights to discipline the students” (Zirkel 36).
A boy by the name of Ben Brewer wore a band t-shirt. Too hamilton middle and was suspended for it. He was suspended for breaking the schools policy of no wearing t-shirts displaying musical groups. The rule was put into place by principal Carter. Do too many arguments breaking out of which groups were better.
School officials have been instructed to in no way promote or hinder student prayer or religious gatherings on school
Facts of the case Same Sex Rights Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1S.C.R. 493 There was a guy named Vriend who was a college instructor. At the time he was in Alberta located in the prairies of Canada. In the year 1988 he was given a full time permanent position as a laboratory coordinator at a college. In the year 1991the president had told Vriend to resign from his position of being the college instructor due to the fact that he was homosexual. Vriend then refused to quit his job that the college fired him.
This past October an intersex U.S. Navy veteran, Dana Zzyym, gained national attention after they were denied a passport. Zzyym identifies as neither male nor female, so they were denied the right to a passport after refusing to select a gender box on the application. After the denial Zzyym filed a federal discrimination lawsuit on the grounds that it is a constitutional violation to force an intersex person to select a gender box. Their argument is that gender, or lack of thereof, has nothing to do with travel, so why should it restrict or force people to declare a gender marker they do not identify as. Zzyym’s case finally brings to light how significant two little boxes can truly be, especially for those who live their lives outside
What rights are limited in schools and what is the school legally allowed to do? This has been a topic that occurred many times throughout history. Strip searches are unconstitutional in some cases due to the Fourth Amendment. Schools are not allowed to strip search any student in any circumstances, they have to leave it to a higher authority. In this case, the school officials performed a strip search on a female, thinking it was the right thing to do, meanwhile, it was illegal.
The Child Protection in Public Schools is a bill proposed by the Florida state senate prohibiting the use of pronouns that do not correspond to a person’s legal sex, forbidding the discussion of sexual orientation or gender identity for grades K-9, and strictly teaching the benefits of a monogamous heterosexual relationship (Florida Senate). For students who identify as transgender or gender nonconforming, they will not be allowed to be referred to by their preferred respective pronouns. The prohibition of pronoun use can be considered as disrespectful or an act of degradation towards gender identity. The lack of education on homosexual sexual orientation may lead to higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases or HIV because students were uneducated on the practice of safe intercourse or safe homosexual relationships. Moreover, children who question their gender identity or sexual orientation will not be allowed to seek advice from teachers or school counselors, causing identity confusion and a lack of resources that may not be available at home.
To keep the educational opportunities equal for all sexes, including transgender, schools must allow transgender students to use the restroom they identify with. Doing otherwise would create a stigma attached to transgender students (since students could be initially unaware that the individual is transgender) causing their learning environment to become uncomfortable, hurting their studies. Under Title IX, the school isn’t allowed to treat G.G. differently because of his sex,
Beyond that, I have accepted the challenge and will not stand by and watch needless suffering. As a student enamored by the law and its interpretation, I appreciate the opportunity the study of law presents for enhancing the lives of students with IBD issues like Crohn’s. In fact, it is my goal to work towards the creation of appropriate laws in academic environments that protect the quality of life and education for teens living with any illness. I study literature that describes such pioneering efforts like Ally’s Law, which states that, if a retail establishment does not have public restrooms, those who experience medical conditions that require immediate bathroom access must be allowed entrance.
