More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on how charter schools are better than public schools
Charter schools versus public schools debate
Essays on how charter schools are better than public schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article Charter School’s Segregation Roots, Christopher Bonastia argues that charter schools have become highly segregated. It is critical that charter schools have a diversity of children. Cultural diversity is important especially among young children it helps them to develop skills to function in multicultural environment and teaches them how to get along with each other at a young age. While, they are many positive and negative outcomes of charter school it is of importance that we are not using charter schools as an excuse for the cause of segregation. Additionally, charter schools should be striving for racial diversity among its teachers.
“ Under the Obama administration, the federal government functioned as a giant octopus, bypassing families, communities, and states in order to reach its tentacles into the school curriculum, teacher evaluation, values conformity and even restroom policies.” ( Ashford 2017) Her idea is to let kids of different religions build their own schools or choose which schools they go too. The funding will be more evenly distributed giving disadvantaged kids the chance to learn. These disadvantaged kids will have the choice of what school they can attend too.
Charters are managed by authorizing organizations (e.g. for-profit, not-for-profit, corporations with autonomy to develop its own curriculum, teaching
Growing away from the interests of teacher unions started with the first charter school in Minnesota. Minnesota’s charter law failed to include universal teacher certification requirements and automatic collective bargaining rights for teachers. It also failed to prevent the creation of charter schools that targeted particular ethnic and racial minority groups, therefore many charter schools were founded that aimed at a particular group such as Somali students (p.14). Furthermore, Democratic President Clinton supported the charter school movement, thus a lot of federal money was spent on founding new ones.
The operating body has a legislative contract (charter) with the state/jurisdiction that exempts the school from certain regulations in exchange for meeting the accountability standards in the charter (Institute of Education Sciences). It is important to note that the accountability standards for the school are those outlined in the charter, not those put forth by the state for traditional public schools. In the book, 50 Myths and Lies that Threaten America’s Public Schools: The Real Crisis in Education, authors David C. Berliner and Gene V. Glass explain that charter schools use the autonomy they have as privately run corporations that are not subject to the same regulations as traditional public schools to discourage the enrollment of certain students, including those with special needs or from a low socioeconomic background. They may require certain forms or applications that limit the ability to apply. Other schools systematically flunk students in order to achieve a one hundred percent graduation rate.
The originality of Charter schools were proposed as an alternative for poorly performing public schools located in high poverty neighborhoods. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has invested over$100 million in charter schools. In the opinions of the writers of this
It is my belief that charter schools should be held accountable for addressing the needs of the same student population. The New York City Department of Education, in collaboration with the Office of School Health, has implemented programs to address mental issues in schools. Charter schools should implement the same services to the students who are enrolled I their school, opposed to discharging them to the public school they are sharing the building with. The disparity in testing scores and graduation rates will remain the same if the policy remains the same.
There are many problems with having many authorizers for charter schools as explained in the article. 1. Multiple authorizers limit charter school’s academic growth. 2. Multiple authorizers mean there is no oversight.
At once when the students failed to achieve the expected score, the government shuts the school down, which charter
The major argument today is that implementing a school voucher system will allow Texas residents pay fewer public taxes through getting paid back from the government and using this money to choose/fund a private or religious school. These vouchers allow the rich to avoid taxes and instead receive profit through voucher credits, leaving the rest of the public to pay for public schools on their own. (Ravitch, 2023) These companies can also cherry pick their students and deny students that may not fit their “criteria”. This school system can lead to corruption due to companies worrying more about profits rather than students.
Basing school funding on property tax leads to unequal opportunities and environments for students, even though the government may claim it is not up to them, there needs to be a drastic change. Currently, taxes collected from the surrounding communities fund public school districts. Public schools get financed mainly by the property tax of the surrounding houses. “Resources available to school districts relied heavily on local property wealth, and property wealth per pupil varied greatly, as it continues today”
This paper will discuss and examine about the charter school performance in the New York City area in depth. Charter School has a negative and a positive outcome like any organization. However, in my view in many ways charter school way of operating has a more positive outcome than negative. The advantages that New Yorkers and more than forty sates around the United States have, such as residents have the independence of using their own ways of teaching, they have superior accountability if they don’t carry out their responsibility and the community happy, their enrollment numbers may go down and they could lose their charter status or simply close due to lack of students.
Charters receive public funding based on the number of students that are attending the school. They may also have private investors and sponsors to help fund the school. Charters do operate separate from the public school system (Yennie 1). Whereas, Baten goes on to explain, “Public schools are funded primarily by state and local sources; the federal government historically has provided less than 10 percent of public education funding.
Why the government should get rid of charter schools? Education Minister Chris Hopkins is closing the door on future charter schools and giving existing ones notice that he can make them close up shop by the end of the school year. The government should close charter schools for 3 reasons. First they have a two tier system and are able to change timetables, charter schools get more money, and they choose who they hire and fire.
