ipl-logo

Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

569 Words3 Pages

There is no simple answer to the debate about paying college athletes. Kieran McCauley published an article arguing that “college athletes shouldn’t be paid.” It has been argued for many years but recent allegations of players has brought the issue to light once again. Should colleges be able to take advantage of their athletes to make money off them?(rhetoric question) It may not be easy to implement a new policy, but I firmly believe that college athletes should be paid. Athletes dedicate time and energy to practice and compete, yet the college is the one reaping the benefits. With March Madness coming up, colleges are raking in money while the players are missing classes and opportunities to learn, sometimes playing upwards of two games a week. The NCAA makes $10.8 billion every season from the free labor of college athletes. They’re stealing candy from 460,000 babies (Metaphor) . …show more content…

With athletes focusing on their sport day in and out how are they supposed to create any potential for their careers outside of sports? It's the elephant in the room when talking about whether college athletes get just as good education as regular students. They don't have time to study and get all their work done so teams resort to getting the players “tutors” to help players struggling. Kieran suggests that if players can't get a job after college it's “their own wrong-doing” but that's not necessarily the case. Overall, people who are not involved with sports don't fully understand the wear and tear that players have everyday. Because college athletes aren't able to get a job or a internship, receiving money throughout their career would exponentially help the majority of players who don't become professional players. If students athletes were to get get paid they would become less likely to accept money from outside

Show More
Related
744 Words | 3 Pages

Most college athletes don't even get the education they were promised. As in they don’t ever have the time to actually sit and think about their school and study, for college athletes it's all about the games and practices. It takes a lot of skill to actually get good grades while doing the sport you love, but even then you won't have enough time to get a job to pay for expenses, food and equipment. The NCAA makes around $6 million yearly, but still refuses to pay the athletes that make that money for them. Considering that college games are just as popular as the professional games, the NCAA and many other college require you to be in college for about 2 years before you can even think of going

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Should college athletes be paid for playing in their sport? There is an argument to be made on both sides of the issue surrounding their compensation. While some people believe that college athletes should be paid extra for their time in their sport. Others believe that they already receive enough compensation through their scholarships they were given. This discussion has been going on for a very long time, and many past college athletes have argued the same argument.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

Student athletes in college do not need to be paid because it makes college players believe that they deserve special privileges. Paying college athletes will also just create pandemonium about what they feel they deserve or should receive for their physical abilities. In other words, it brings up more problems than it solves by giving players money or stipends to live off of.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Some think College Athletes should be paid, but others believe they shouldn’t. However, research shows that College athletes should be paid. If so the money could help students pay for their necessities, make rules fairer, and help students become more motivated. One reason College athletes should be paid is that the money could help students pay for necessities. When College students join College sports teams they are giving up a lot of time to

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Whether it be hockey, football, cricket or basketball ever since the turn of the era, intercollegiate athletics have fetched in an excess of proceeds to their corresponding institution as well as swelling College’s reputation. Talking of expertise, the actuality that a player is a college pupil does not automatically mean he or she is an incompetent. For example, a typical college football player trains around 41.3 hours per week; to feed and attire themselves adequately, these pupils often wind up doing part-time works thus working 40 to 44 hours a week at their free ”job” and then devote an additional 15 to 20 hours at a paid job. In addition, they also require dedicating at least 10 to 15 hours as well to studying to maintain grades. For

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

Athletes dedicate their whole lives to being a part of a college team, and much time is sacrificed in order to participate. Although some people claim that paying college athletes would detract from the academic environment

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes should get paid because they put in a lot of hard work and dedication to their sport. They often have to balance their studies with their athletic responsibilities, which can be a difficult task. Additionally, college sports generate a lot of revenue for universities and the NCAA, and it seems unfair that the athletes themselves don't receive any of that money. There are many pros and cons to the idea of college athletes getting paid.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Athletes should be able to receive a portion of the money that comes from merchandise with their image. Finally, they and are not offered medical or death insurance. Allowing these students to be paid can help benefit their future sports and academic career. During a regular sports season, college athletes are focused on practice and school because of this they don’t have the time to be able to get a regular job to make money of their own. These students often go to colleges and universities that offer them scholarships for sports.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

Should college athletes be paid? This has been a long-running debate in the collegiate sports industry. Every student knows that they cannot be paid as an athlete in college. (Text 4, line 36) The college sports industry generates a hefty sum through its revenues, around eleven billion dollars yearly.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

One of the reasons why college athletes should be paid is that they bring in a significant amount of revenue for their universities. As noted in "The Case for Paying College Athletes," “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million.” Text 1 line 1-3

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

For the athletes, the money made from their sport would allow increased concentration on their studies due to less focus on tuition and living costs. As statistics have previously shown about the minimal chances of ever going pro as an athlete, a salary would make the time the college athletes spent on their sport worthwhile, and they can also have a higher chance of being better off financially post college. If their time as a college athlete is made valuable, it will also increase motivation and potential to further hone their skills to perform better in their sport. Though giving college athletes a salary would be exceptionally beneficial for them, it also has negative aspects as well, pertaining to the colleges’ perspective about it. One major argument made against college athletes salaries is that if they get paid, then they would become regular employees, and are then subject to being laid off.

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

It is something that the public forgets often. They play their sport in packed stadiums of adoring fans, their games are broadcast live on television. But they are still students. And college students have expenses that need to be paid somehow. New York Times article Supreme Court Backs Payments to Student-Athletes in NCAA Case states “Throughout its 115-year history, the NCAA has largely defended the notion that students should play sports in exchange for no more than a scholarship, books, room and board and, more recently, the estimated cost of attending college, a figure that can include travel and other living expenses.

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

Even though getting paid seems nice, it would cause many problems. College student-athletes should not get paid because they already receive benefits, the student-athlete's mindset would shift, and schools would be affected. In the first place, college student-athletes should not receive

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

Colleges can spare a few hundred thousand dollars to play their athletes. They should be paid because college athletes bring in money, they don’t have time for a job, and the sport causes damage to their body. One of the reasons that college athletes should be paid is because college athletes bring in money. With their name, image, and likeness college athletes bring in a lot of money for their schools by endorsing their

Read More

More about Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Open Document