ipl-logo

Should Death Penalty Be Allowed Research Paper

981 Words4 Pages

Should the Death Penalty be allowed? The death penalty is a painless action by lethally injecting a person govern for the purposes of euthanasia or as a means of capital punishment. The death penalty should be allowed in all states because it punishes criminals the way they should be, it costs a lot of money to house prisoners, and it deters the criminals from committing more of those crimes. There are many people who don't get punished the way they should for the disheartening crimes that they commit. Many criminals that have committed crimes such as murder, child abuse, and/or sexual abuse, etc., have life sentences and sit in their cells, take up space, and use our tax dollars to be housed. Yes, prison is a hellish place and it’s somewhere …show more content…

Not just that but jails in the United States are overcrowding with criminals and making it hard to find room for them. There is a way to stop overfilling our jails and waisting our taxes and that reason is called the death penalty. Criminals are filling the jails and one day there will be to many people in jail that we don't have anywhere to put these criminals. Across the country, police are being laid off, prisoners are being released early, the courts are clogged, and crime continues to rise. (Richard C. DieterIf) Criminals around the country are getting released our of prisons early because the rate of crimes are rising and the jails are overflowing with new criminals each day and have no where to put them. If the criminals keep getting released early, their mindset would to think that if they got out early once, might as well do it again. They will commit more crimes, whether it be a new one or the same as the last. The point is is that the criminals will not learn from their mistakes and will keep repeating them knowing the consequence wont be that harsh. If the death penalty were to be put in tact, one, there would be more room for the criminals in their housing and we wouldn't have to keep releasing them. And two, the criminals wont have a necessarily chance to keep making the same mistakes because they are either sentenced …show more content…

If people heard that the death penalty were to be instated, then they would be terrified to commit a crime worthy if the death penalty, because they would be scared to lose their lives. Not that people wont still those commit crimes. They will, but the percentage of them will decrease. A 2003 and 2006 study that re-examined the data of crime rates, found that each execution results in five fewer homicides. (Mocan) What that is saying is that by one person being executed, there are five murders that aren't happening anymore. People are now fearful to lose their one lives so now they aren't ruining other peoples. The death penalty may take away lives of those who aren't worthy of one, but in the end, it actually saves

Show More
Related
516 Words | 3 Pages

If the death penalty came more into effect now a days, there would be a lot less killing, homicides, murders, etc. Go back to the old days; eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. If you steal, one finger gets cut off. If the government would stop being terrified of hurting someone’s feelings in this society and bring back those actions, crime percentages would fall

Read More
1086 Words | 5 Pages

So, 19 states disagree with the death penalty. So for the federal government to come in a change that will cause some effects happen. A good side of stopping capital punishment is that the drugs that are being used are expensive and there is a shortage. Plus it expensive to get the needed drugs. Though if it continue to happen then the shortage will increase.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

A strong, effective government is key to maintaining peace among all. But once the majority starts to disagree, normal people can turn chaotic. People will do anything to get there way, and usually nothing can stop them. In the book Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a group of kids are deserted on an island, caused by a massive plane crash.

Read More
2229 Words | 9 Pages

The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

The death penalty provides closure for the victim(s) family and people want to protect their family at any cost. The physicians and other doctors there are not there to kill them but to make sure they are comforted at their last minute of life instead of in pain. These doctors make sure the criminal is not in pain while he or she dies. Jail is actually a nice place, people who are homeless often commit crimes to go to jail. There they get fed good, they're clothed, they have a roof over their heads, and most of all they benefit from our tax money.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many studies indicating both a positive and negative effect on the homicide count regarding executions. A study by Hashem Dezhbaksh, Paul H. Rubin, and Joanna M. Shepherd published in the Journal of Law and Economics in 2003 concluded that each execution deterred a rough estimate of 18 murders. While another study by Katherine Baicker and Sendhil Mullainathan published in the Journal of Political Economy in 2004 found no evidence supporting that conclusion. This debate in detail would require a whole other paper. Another argument is retribution.

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

Capital Punishment helps deterrence rates, and cost options for the future, and if the death penalty is inhumane, there will no longer be doubt on whether it is

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

Even if you're sentenced to death, you're probably not going to get executed. That's why it's not a deterrent,”(Horn). People don't even see the death penalty as a punishment so people aren't afraid of commiting crimes. With how dangerous prisons are with overcrowding they are just costing more money for providing the medical attention the inmates need. ” There have been any number of reports about overcrowded and dangerous prisons, and while the Commission presented its conclusions and recommendations to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, it's not clear what - if anything - will come of that,”(Horn).

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

“‘Death sentences represent less than one-tenth of 1% of prison sentences in the United States…,’” (Von Drehle, 9). Furthermore, death row is just a small fraction of the criminal justice system and can not be based on that alone. For instance, what many don't take into account is the justice systems allows for many states, such as the populous state of New York, to ban the death penalty. (state laws, p1)

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

In conclusion, keeping the death penalty would greatly benefit society and the innocent lives living in it. Against the Death Penalty Despite the sound reasoning of those who are pro death penalty, it does not prevent the opposing side from sticking by their reasonings. So on the other hand, those who are against the death penalty feel it isn't as effective as other options, when the state kills it puts guilt on all of us, homicide rates increase after executions, and it has various mental effects on those involved. Similar to the latter how sound the reasoning is of those with this opinion can be argued.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

A solution to the problem over whether the death penalty should be legal, would be to imprison these inmates for life without parole. In doing so, it would not cost as much for the taxpayers - who would no longer have to pay millions of dollars each year for the capital punishment of a few prisoners. Imprisoning these inmates would be more ethically sound seeing as no one would be put to death and there would not be the possibility for a botched execution. Also, the inmate’s mental health should not be affected since they would not have to suffer knowing they were going to be killed, and no one would have to worry about accidentally executing someone innocent because the prisoner would be in jail. Therefore, the death penalty should be banned

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

I believe due to the costs incurred, time taken up in courts, and issue with public outcry that capital punishment has reached a stage where it needs to be re-evaluated. The great thing about our system is flexibility. As society changes and evolves state laws can be changed and updated. I believe there are crimes worthy of capital punishment, but it may be time for the Supreme Court to re-visit select landmark cases. Opponents of the death penalty argue that innocent people are put on death row and possibly executed before they are exonerated.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

Read More
1320 Words | 6 Pages

Should Death Penalty be abolished? Over decades people have been arguing about whether the death penalty should be abolished or not if death is morally right or cruel and unusual penalty. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a government-sanctioned practice whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for crime. Is it right to see people dying even though it’s under the act of government punishment?

Read More

More about Should Death Penalty Be Allowed Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document