Pluto should not be considered to be a planet in the Solar System. This is an accurate answer because there is so much evidence that can be provided to back it up. For example, one reason it should not be considered a planet is because it is roughly the size of other rocks in space near it, and they are closely related to Pluto in ways. It also should not be considered a planet because of its size. It is much smaller than all eight of the other planets, and around 151 Pluto’s would be able to fit inside Earth. This is a surprising amount because it really just shows how puny this planet is. Earth’s moon is even larger than this planet. In addition, another reason why Pluto should not be a planet is because of its extremely different qualities. So, as this information shows, Pluto should not be considered a planet because it lacks the qualities to actually be considered a planet. …show more content…
As the information above states, Pluto is even smaller than the Earth’s moon. This demonstrates just how small that this planet is. The moon has never been even thought about being a planet, so obviously if Pluto were compared to the moon and the smallest planet besides Pluto in the Solar System, Mercury, it could be easily identified as a dwarf planet. The materials that make up this planet are unlike any other planets in the Solar System too. According to NASA.gov, it is estimated from speculation that its core is made up of rock, and it is covered in layers of ice, making it mostly made up of ice. Furthermore, it should not be considered a planet because there are many other rocks up in space that are actually very closely related to it, and they share many qualities. Finally, Pluto should not be called a planet because it really just has the qualities of being considered a large asteroid, or a dwarf