Amanda Ripley demonstrates the consequences for having school sports in “The Case Against High School Sports” because schools are spending too much money on their sports and can be solved. The author brings to the reader’s eye that sports cost way too much money and should be cut. I think Ripley is wrong because even though it cost a lot of money, they should still keep the sports. If they cut the sports, then it’s not fair to the students that are graduating because they could of had a chance to get a scholarship. If the schools cut the sports, then there is no chance for the students.
According to " The Case Against High-School Sports" (2013), sports could create some study, health, and time management problems for schools and students. In this post, Amanda Ripley initially shows the benefits when involving in the high-school sports: exercise, sportsmanship lessons, some positive personalities, more fun and staying away from vices. She also writes some tales to inform readers that in the US, students are interested and enjoy in sports more than other peers in other countries. However, she claims that the high-school sports have negative effects on schools and students. Next, she gave some schools ' examples to show the problems when schools and students spent too much time and money in high-school sports.
The first reason why middle schools should have sports teams is that it can improve academic performance. For example in the article “The pros and cons of sports for middle schools” by public school review the author writes that “a recent study done by the University of Kansas showed a link between physical activity and academic performance.” The study also showed “the student athletes had higher gpas and a 10% higher rate for graduating high school.” In other words when athletes play sports there is a connection to a student's test scores improving. Boosting academic performance is good because opponents argue that sports takes over a teens life and they don't focus on enough school.
There were ten seconds left in the fourth quarter during the high school football finals with the score being 30-27. The Wasps were down three points when they had the ball at the 50 yard line, and the fate of the championship all depended on one throw. “Hike” yelled the quarterback; the ball snapped to him, and the receiver bolted down the field turf spraying from his cleats. 1.1 million students play high school football, and it is one of the most popular sports. The alumni have pride when they wear their jerseys because they represent their school.
In this community lately, there has been discussion lately on sports possibly being removed from the high schools. Although, they get the most recognition that does not mean that just because one little thing it gets removed and completely forgotten about. In fact, so many people do high school sports in the text “Are High School Sports Good For Kids” it explicitly states “Here in Michigan almost 300,000 young people take part in high school sports every year.” This scene particularly shows that many youth athletes participate in high school sports in only one state alone.
Many kids that attend sports will miss classes so they can play sports. Kids could miss important work and classes to play sports. They could miss important tests. However kids will not get enough sleep if school starts early in the day.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Millions of kids grow up wanting to be baseball players. Even though the statistics of playing in the major leagues is not very high we all have a small part of us that thinks we can make it someday. If school baseball were to be cancelled there would be many kids that would become very lost. Baseball is a place for kids to gather, make new friends, stay fit, and even just to have fun. I also believe that baseball and even just sports in general, is a way for kids to stay out of trouble, creating a safe place with positive influences.
Frances is a field hockey player for her school team. One day, she got her report card and saw she got a C+ in Spanish. The next day at practice, her coach told her she was off the team--Even though Frances had been trying her best in Spanish. Frances thought this was unfair and ceased putting effort into Spanish. This is an example of how a child could be negatively by the No Pass, No Play rule.
The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. That’s why it is important than ever for schools to invest in their athletic programs,” states the sports article “Should Schools get rid of Sports.” Schools should keep their sports programs because they help improve academics, help improve mental and emotional health, and improves social skills like being on a team. Schools should not get rid of their sports programs because they help with student’s academics.
“Yes keep sports” NO! We should not get ride of sports. It gets kids to make more frineds.it gets kids to interak with each ther.so it would lowen bulling in schools. Kids should be about to play sport it gets them to make friends.other people think we should band sportes but i say no it helps people make bff`s.sports are.
Sports can enhance the cooperative and strategic strategies. The passage states that, “understanding the competitive process entails an appreciation of the social nature of competition, particularly with regard to the cooperative and strategic aspects of sports and an awareness of the nature of individual roles within a cooperating group.” The last reason, which it the academic benefits, proves that you shouldn’t take away the sports for school. The kids that play sports benefit in the classroom a lot more than regular students.
Some may argue that playing sports in high school will take time away from academics. Sports can consume a lot of time and energy at the expense of school work and some feel that this can cost
Schools should not ban sports programs, because it 's improves physical and academic health. According to the article ´´Should your school get rid of sports´´ explains ´´ Physically active kids have more focus, are better problem solvers, and score higher on tests. ´´ This article explains that kids that are physically involved with sports have better concentration than kids that don 't
Sports also impact things like students’ health and family. These are just some of the reasons why schools should remove athletics. To begin with, sports take up a lot of money in the school budget. It is very expensive to fund sports. ” By suspending sports, Singleton realized, he could save $150,000 in one year.