Should The Freedom Of Speech Amendment Be Allowed In The Book 1984 By George Orwell

636 Words3 Pages

Justice for Oceania Oceania is a vile dictatorship that severely takes control of the rules and people of the community. Oceania revolves around the control of the prisoner’s thoughts and actions. The people of Oceania are limited in the things they can say or think. “Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same.” (Orwell pg 19) This example shows why the addition of the Freedom of Speech amendment would be one of the most beneficial amendments that could possibly be added. With The Thought Police, always know every thought you have before you say it. Along with the goal of Newspeak being to disband the English language, one word at a time. With all …show more content…

This would be an Earth shattering difference for the prisoners of Oceania for many reasons. They would be allowed to say anything against Big Brother with no repercussions taken. “People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you have ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten.”(Orwell pg 19) This citation shows the exact measures that are taken if you were to oppose Big Brother with words or even actions. The addition of this amendment would ultimately change the whole social standard by making people unafraid to stand up against Big Brother. The freedom of speech would also entirely nullify the objective of Newspeak by making all words allowed to anyone. The upside of this change would lead to a mass amount of people voicing their differing opinions, whether it is in favor of Big Brother or against. In the novel The Party tells Winston “reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.” (Orwell pg 80) This shows that the Party wishes to control the actions and thoughts of the prisoners by telling them to reject the truth and listen to The