Why We Shouldn’t Use Racial Quotas in College Admissions
In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in the Regents of University of California vs. Bakke case, that the use of racial preferences in college admissions violates the Equal Protections Clause of the fourteenth amendment. The Equal Protections Clause says that no state shall deny a person equal protection within jurisdiction. Since then, a great deal of Affirmative Action cases against colleges have transpired. There is much dispute among colleges and potential students on the issue. Even though considering race in the college admission process creates student-wide diversity, racial preferences should not exist in the admission process because Affirmative Action policies are inequitable, give an unfair advantage to students that do not deserve it, and leads to reverse discrimination.
Affirmative Action policies used in college admissions are unfair. They do not advocate for equality of all people. These policies do not evenhandedly measure one’s academic skills. Whether or not a person is accepted into a college has nothing to do with their academics. They are accepted on account of meeting the racial quotas of that school. Racial preferences place students in a position where they are not able to learn
…show more content…
However, use of the racial quotas are unjust, steers reverse discrimination, and give unfair advantages to minorities. Preferential treatment was formed to put an end to bias against minority groups, but instead they do the exact opposite. The underprivileged students are being automatically admitted into schools based on their racial background. Young scholars are being turned down not because of their amazing academics, but because they don’t meet that school’s racial quota. This is unfair to those students that have worked hard to get the grades they have. Racial preferences in the college admission process should be