ipl-logo

Shouldn T Be Underestimated

1743 Words7 Pages

Robert Kagan’s article “The Importance of U.S. Military Might Shouldn’t be Underestimated” examines whether or not implementing defense cuts is beneficial to the United States’ (U.S.) national interests. He argues that decreasing defense spending is not in the U.S.’s national interests. The United States uses military force to spread democracy around the world, to uphold the international system, and to maintain U.S.’s power and influence. The author fears that the defense budget reductions will lead to a decreased U.S.’s capacity to maintain a stable international order and a reduction of U.S. power relative to other countries power. Within the author’s central argument, one can find elements of international relations theory: …show more content…

International order in this article is another word for international society, a key concept of idealism. He explores how the spread of democracy aided the construction of an international society. America’s support for democracy worldwide and its ability to protect people from dictators allowed for the global democratization. (1-2) Democratization is part of the democratic peace theory, which states that democratic states will not fight against each other. Thus, encouraging democratic movements abroad will only benefit the United States by decreasing the number of openly hostile nations. The use of military power behind the U.S. democratic encouragement is essential and it cannot be reduced. Democratization helped contribute to the construction of a peaceful international society and it would not be in the U.S. interests to reduce the means the United States uses to encourage democracy. Military power helps contribute to the international order because it also helps the economic power. The use of military force upholds economic security for other nations. U.S. military power upholds economic rules around the world such as keeping trade routes open. Thus, decreasing military spending will decrease the stability of the world order. Kagan emphasizes idealist terms, such as international order and democratization, …show more content…

He begins by stating, “The international system is not static. It responds quickly to fluctuations in power.” (2) If the United States cuts its defense spending, other nations influence will rise while U.S. power declines. Thus, a new balance of power and sphere of influence will emerge in areas of the world. (2) Thus, it is against the U.S. interests to cut the defense spending because it will increase other countries’ influence in the world in comparison to ours. Kagan concludes the article that the U.S. no longer can provide security for the world, other nations may begin to look elsewhere for support, which erodes U.S. power (3). Thus, the United States cannot decrease the defense budget because other nations can move in and become more influential in other countries eyes. The realist theory of power rivalry is prevalent in Kagan’s argument of why decreasing the defense spending is a terrible

Show More
Related
1094 Words | 5 Pages

In the aftermath of WWII, the US stood as one of the few powers relatively unharmed, as well as the sole nation in possession of nuclear weapons. This afforded the US a great degree of power and leadership in the world. However the USSR was another great power that managed to avoid much destruction from the war, and besides being ideologically opposed, matters were complicated after the USSR developed nuclear weapons for itself. This prompted the formulation of a new foreign policy. Document 7 states that the US “must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination.”

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Security sector reform is globally referred to as “a process to reform or rebuild a state’s security sector toward good security sector governance (SSG)”. Brooks argues that the U.S. military-who operates in almost every country has taken on too many roles, ignoring its main responsibility of protecting America’s security. Seeing as Brooks believes we have no idea what war is or what it can morph into, this

Read More
1885 Words | 8 Pages

Lippmann criticizes Kennan when he says, “Mr. X offers us the prospect of maintaining such a coalition indefinite until—eventually—the Soviet power breaks up or mellows because it has been frustrated. It is not a good prospect” (224). Lippmann thinks that it is necessary for the US to intervene or else the Soviet Union’s power will spread. However, Lippmann dislikes the idea of waiting for the Soviet power to diminish. Lippmann emphasizes that Kennan’s plan is too hopeful; Kennan’s proposal calls for the US to have tremendous economic power, the strength to restrain the Soviet Union wherever it intruded, and the patience to wait for the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

Not all of Bacevich’s arguments would be agreed with, but he presents his evaluations professionally and backs up each one with the necessary evidence. Bacevich’s main argument is that American foreign policy did not have a drastic change. He claims that on one hand the founding fathers and their principle of freedom had been mistaken with hunger, but on the other they had always planned on creating an American Empire and that their foreign policy has always been focused on the national objective of creating, growing, and keeping it. The empire was to fix all the war problems as it kept the U.S. as an admired and unbeatable source of power. However, Bacevich implies that this thirst of power has led the U.S. into a number of disasters that cost more to get out

Read More
300 Words | 2 Pages

the article “Tim Kaine and the Democrats’ Defense of Abortion” wrote by Greg Phillips. The author mentioned how the Tim Kaine feeling and viewpoint of abortion changed after having children. He felt uncomfortable for killing innocent children mother's womb due excuse from their mothers. However, being pro-choice made him to understand more about women and how will affect them mentally and physically for having the child. The strongest argument for Time was that every women has right to choose abortion and there no way others would argue her reproductive choices.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Over the course of two world wars the U.S learned a bitter lesson. That “taking… shelter across the sea.” (Ronald). will not bring victory or security to the citizens that the government is sworn to protect. Reagan realizes this, but the idea of becoming the world's watcher for tyrannical governments and threats seems daunting too even the most powerful of countries.

Read More
1962 Words | 8 Pages

Walter Lippmann, a foreign policy intellectual, offered a counter to the Truman administration’s foreign policy plan which was built upon the foundation laid by George Kennan. Lippmann’s counter questioned America’s current diplomatic strategy of trying to contain the communist influence in the Soviet Union. He begins his counter by explaining that he agrees with Mr. X (Kennan) that the Soviet threat cannot be “charmed or talked out of existence.” However, he explains that his policy is misconceived and therefore has resulted in a misuse of American power. Lippmann disagrees with Kennan’s idea of reacting “at a series of constantly shifting geographical and political points” to the encroachment of Soviet power.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

It is no doubt that the Monroe Doctrine has become a staple in the study of American foreign policy. Since the establishment of the nation, America’s role in foreign policy has been questioned and under constant scrutiny. In his Farewell Address, George Washington warned of foreign entanglement. Stemming from Washington’s warning to Monroe’s doctrine – a disagreement has grown, what is the American role in the World. It was President James Monroe’s doctrine that ushered in a new belief for America’s role.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

In the years following September 11th, 2001, American military spending has skyrocketed (Document F). The purpose of this document is to exhibit how American resources are being more focused on the military following the attacks. In 2001, the United States spent around 400 billion dollars to support the military. The graph shows a sharp incline from then until 2011, where military spending was up to about 700 billion. This statistic can be connected to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, as America has become more focused on militan efforts due to the events of September 11th.

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

With great power comes great responsibility. That of moral, political and economic power has divided America into three different selections. That power must be managed and not push upon other countries and their views… we must be strong in our political moves, military gains, and economic growth. Which in turn scared our “ally” friends into believing we will take over there the way of life and turn it into an American way of

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

If America did not encourage a democracy among these nations they would have been subjected to communism; this would take away any rights that they would receive by living in a democracy. By extending political and

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Reviewing the speech given in 1983 by President Ronald Reagan that addressed the nation about the limitations and lack of armaments and weapons available at the time to effectively fight the Soviet Union in an instance of an attack, President Reagan stressed the need to not argue against the budgetary amount but in fact, talk to members of Congress to reaffirm the need to fund the budget for additional weaponry. In the speech, President Reagan stressed that the United States has never been the aggressor in any of the previous worldwide conflicts (Reagan, 1983). There were several zingers in the speech aimed at the previous liberal president’s that questioned allowing the budgetary means to protect the country to significantly dwindle while at the same time spending those same funds to take care of the social ills of the United States citizens. Previous Presidential administrations advocated for methods of deterrence of war

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

The democratization was also crucial in the maintenance of the international order because there is less risk that nations fight against each other if both countries are democratic. Therefore, the United States needed to make Japan a democratic country to prevent Japan to become its

Read More
126 Words | 1 Pages

For Mearsheimer, this is the very basis of realistic thinking and in turn equates international order to anarchy. 2. Great powers maintain and continue to acquire militaristic capabilities in order to eradicate the idea of weakness and establish sovereignty over lesser powers. 3. A country can never be sure of another country’s motive hence each party is left

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Since the founding of the United States, there has been a debate over the power of the presidency, in regards to the constitution. In the article, “The Constitution and United States Foreign Policy: An Interpretation”, author Walter LaFeber, examines the theme of presidential power and the constitution in association with American foreign policy. From the beginning of the 1790s, there were debates as to the power that an American president had in the United States and in the world. These arguments continued between the 19th and 20th centuries. What was also important and central to this article, is not only the level of power a president does have in foreign affairs, but also the harmful consequences in using those powers without adhering to

Read More

More about Shouldn T Be Underestimated

Related Topics

Open Document