A constitution is in essence rules that creates a government. In general, every modern written constitution discusses explicit rules to a government entity based upon the fundamental stipulation that it accepts the assumed that it follows the legitimate guidelines. In the last century, there have been numerous influences of new constitutions. In the 90’s the most recent trend of new constitutions was seen. Countless countries imitated the United States constitution. Hence, it is safe to say majority all the countries in the world have a constitution. Each country’s constitution is different in a sense but a few actually mimic the United States. But for purposes of this assignment we will be looking at the United States constitution and the …show more content…
Yet, this is not the only difference. Both constitution have difference in processes and the organization of the government. One procedure difference is in regards to the amendments of both constitutions. In the state of Georgia, voters are required to ratify all amendments to the state’s constitution. However, the U.S. constitution doesn’t require voter participation when it’s pertaining to ratification of amendments. Yet an amendment must be recommended by Congress and have a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. Afterwards, Congress will recommend the amendment in the form of a joint resolution and a notification is sent to the Governors of each state. As a result the recommended amendment only becomes a part of the constitution only if it is ratified by 38 of 50 states. A great example of the amendment process is the 27th amendment. Originally submitted to congress on September 25, 1789, the congressional apportionment amendment didn’t get ratified because there weren’t enough states for the amendment to become a part of the constitution. The amendment was forgotten for decades until it was ratified by 39 states on May 18,