There are many different examples of how the structures between both levels of government are similar and how they differ. The US Constitution
They both include the concept of federalism in their documents. The US constitution subordinate to the federal government, but the Texas Constitution have subordinate to the state government. But with all these similarities, they also have a lot of differences between them. As we talk about US Constitution, it
The first document talks about how federal and local government had different powers. For example, the local government had more local problems like setting up schools, setting up local government and holding elections. But Federal government delt with problems that could affect the country as a whole such as regulating trade or declaring war. Federalism protects us against tyranny because it limits what can be done of a state level and what can be done on a federal level.
There are many similarities between the PA state constitution and the US constitution. However, there are also many differences between the two. These differences include certain rules and laws that the country has, but cannot enforce on the state. To start, the Us constitution states the right to declare war, which is a right focused on the state government, not the general civilization. This fact is a common difference between the two constitutions.
Not only is there a federal government, but there are also state and local governments. Furthermore, there are forms of government that function on a higher basis than local governments, but on a lower basis than state governments. Although the federal government has overall control on how the country functions, the other forms of government have a considerable impact on the laws of each area. All states have varying laws that lie along the same lines. For instance, the age to get a Driver’s license is not the same from state to state, but they are around the same age.
The state government control the parts of the government that effect the people of that state such as marriage, making schools, and holding elections. The federal government has the power to do things such as starting wars, regulating trade, and printing currency. Federalism protects against tyranny by dividing power between the state and government, which helps from the government having too much power over the people and their lives and instead gives that power to the state to regulate it. Without giving power to the state instead of the government we would be controlled by people who may have never even stepped foot in that
Federalism Compare state sovereignty under the Articles of Confederation and under the Constitution. States were sovereign under the Articles of the Confederation although they shared no power under the constitution. It is the states that were supreme under the Articles of Confederation that led to the creation of a government that had a weaker national government. The executive arm of the government was not independent, and there were no federal courts since the state courts enacted all the laws (Brest, p.58). Also, neither did the Congress have the taxing power nor did it have the power to control interstate or foreign commerce.
and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both represent the principles of representative democratic government, in which power originated from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement, both provide for two branches of legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate and both request a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They also both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government.
With the state governments having more power, there was no order in the country. Every state had different laws, taxes, court systems, and currencies, so it was like each state was its own individual country. When the national government had more power, the country was more organized and unified because everyone followed the same laws, had most of the same taxes, had one national court system, and all had the same type of currency. The country was also somewhat more equal because each state had an equal number of representatives in the government. Federalists were happy with the decision to pass the Constitution because they supported it, while the anti-federalists were unhappy because they were against it.
Fourth, the differences and similarities of the state and federal judicial branch will be stated and explained. The first similarity is how, “All power shall be vested in the Supreme Court (Federal)...the state judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court, (Illinois),” (pg. 36-62). It is important for both constitution to have one main court where all of the judicial power is vested in, so that not everything is split up between many other courts. The next similarity is how, “The main purpose of the judicial branch is to interpret the laws and administer justice (Federal)...the judicial branch in Illinois administers justice and interprets the laws (Illinois),” (pg.
The Texas and Maine state constitution are both used to govern their respective states. They both limit government, separation of powers, and also they both have bill of rights that protect the rights of the people. But, in various ways, the documents have key differences that distinguishes one from
The division between federal and national style governments is seen with the ratification of the Constitution, because it is ratified through each State instead of the people directly. Under the Constitution the choice to join the federal government was left to the states, so they could choose to enter the union voluntarily. Twice throughout Federalist 39 Madison explains his reason for creating a federal government stating, “the Constitution will not be a national but a federal act” and again, “the new Constitution will, it established, be a federal and not a national constitution. In the hopes of achieving ratification Madison wants whoever was reading to recognize the unique system being created. The final piece of Federalist 39 explains how States would have jurisdiction over local governments, but states would not have jurisdiction over the federal
This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.
State constitutions and the U.S. constitution’s powers differ in the same way that I stated above. The U.S. Constitution almost sets up an outline that he states can use to then only add in the detail. Just as Florida’s 2, 3 and 4th amendment are all summed up in the Bill of Right’s 1st amendment. The U.S.’s constitutional powers hold a basic structure over all the people; however the states hold a more specified power over each resident of that state.
The Constitution provides not only the framework for how the state and federal governments are structured, but it also places clearly stated limits on their powers. Moreover “federal” refers to the two level system in US－national government and this of each state (they are 50 in total). Last but not least “republic” is a form of government in which the ultimate power rests with the people, but they exercise it through election of representatives.
