Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are
So, he decided to make Hammurabi’s code with 282 laws organized by specific themes. Although a set of laws was needed, the severity of punishments in property and family laws sure outweighed any of the good laws he made. Hammurabi’s code was not just because of his family law. In law 129 it states “if a married lady is caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water” (Doc C) and that isn’t just because That’s not fair
Each type of code is meant to bring justice to all the parts of society so that there would be fairness to the accused, fairness to the victim and fairness for society. Some of Hammurabi’s codes were fair and others were not fair. The first law is Family Law and it states that If a son has struck his father, his hands shall
After close analysis, the law code of Hammurabi was just in the area of property law. In the first place Hammurabi helped to protect peoples property by creating his property laws. A example of how Hammurabi protected his peoples property is law 23, "If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a god, and the city and the mayor whose territory or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost." This shows that if the robber was not found the community was still to help out by replacing what was stolen.
Hammurabi's code and the Ten Commandments have similar rules or laws to follow. In Chapter 20, Verse 12, The Ten Commandments say that one should, “Honor your father and your mother, that your days will be prolonged in the land your Lord your God gives you.” This is basically saying that if you respect your parents you shall be rewarded with the Promised land. The same goes for Hammurabi's code. Law 195 says, ”If a son strike his father, his hands shall be hewn off.”
The Hebrew Law was based on commandments. While in the Hammurabi 's Code if they did not have money than you were just consider a slave. But both Hammurabi 's Code and the Hebrew Law dealt with the social
Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.
Laws are always the core of a society and they often indicate a variety of lifestyle decisions made by those people. Hammurabi’s famous set of laws and Moses’ laws could be viewed as two completely distinct documents, yet both set of laws aide historians in revealing insight to the Hebrew and Mesopotamian people. In both societies, enforcing strict consequences that are equivalent to the crime is common. Hammurabi’s well known law states that, “if a man has put out an eye of a free man, they shall put out his eye.” Whereas, in the Hebrew laws, it states, “...if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, eye for eye...”
These laws were created to make sure there was justice for crimes and order under his rule. This was one of the most positive things that happened in the Babylonian Empire because it helped to strengthen and unite it. The code not only dealt with crimes but also helped women and slaves by being more fair to them. For example, under Hammurabi’s code, women could own land and were able to leave their husband if he was at blame for them having problems.
Hammurabi’s code gives judgements and consequences for certain crimes. The punishment for a crime depended on one’s social rank. There were essentially three classes; the priests and noble landlords, the freemen, and slaves. Each law illustrated the division in the societies social status. As a particular law read; “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed.
Conclusion. There are some similarities and differences between the Mosaic Law and code of Hammurabi. Considering that the code of Hammurabi predates the Mosaic Law, it is logical to assume there is a possibility that Moses plagiarized or got ideas from Hammurabi. However, I believe that similarities do not prove plagiarism. Most of the similarities in the two sets of laws are limited to the fact that both codes address things like murder, stealing, adultery, kidnapping, etc., problems that every society must address.
Hammurabi's code is unjust. Hammurabi did try to do what was right by trying to have a community with justice, but the laws are very unequal and harsh. These laws would not last in today's
Similarly, the Code of Hammurabi from ancient Mesopotamia diffused into the Hebrew law. The Exodus also included a similar phrase of the principle of retaliation, “eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe” . Contrary to the Code of Hammurabi, the Exodus did not divide the Hebrews into social classes. Whether monotheism or polytheism, both Mesopotamian and Hebrew laws are significantly similar as there are also monetary compensations. For instance, “When men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that there is a miscarriage and yet no harm follows, the one who hurt her shall be fined” .
Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).
This was important as the law was believed to be the will of god, but each tribe and city may have a different god that they were trying to please. Hammurabi’s code was very detailed in the punishments for crimes. His code was one of retribution – an eye for an eye type of justice (Mark, 2018). Hammurabi also included rights for women – they could make contracts, divorce their husbands and provided protections that mandated husbands returned their wife’s property after a divorce (Hunt, et. al.
