ipl-logo

Similarities Between Roman Empire And Gupta India

431 Words2 Pages

The methods of political control in the Roman Empire and Gupta India, were similar because they both emphasized a single ruler or emperor. They did this because each area was spread out and broken up, thus needing unification more than anything. However, they had different methods of religious, political, cultural, and administrative control. Both empires had a single emperor because of the high demand for unity. Both areas were a mess when it came to politics before each empire rose. In the early Mediterranean, there was constant conflict and political tension between city-states. The Roman Empire came along and stopped the fighting because they were all under one ruler. Having the entire Mediterranean Sea under one emperor instilled the “pax …show more content…

In Rome, the emperor was worshipped as a god. And people who didn’t follow the traditional Roman polytheism couldn’t worship him. He used common religions to gain political power and control over the people. Christians were the main focus of religious persecution in Imperial Rome. They were monotheistic, so their inability to worship the emperor as a god threatened his power. They even imprisoned, condemned and executed Jesus, who was part of the basis for Christianity. The Gupta, however, were not so focused on religion in politics. They kept the two separate. True, Ashoka was an avid Buddhist and posted edicts in rock around the empire to facilitate a Buddhist lifestyle, but he did not persecute those who did not live as a Buddhist. His influence to the religious lifestyle was more subtle than the Romans. Instead of the government sponsoring persecution of those who did not follow in his footsteps, Ashoka wanted them to follow his path to help unify under a religion, but he did not attack those who did not. In Imperial Rome, religion played a more key role in politics than in Mauryan and Gupta

Show More
Related
549 Words | 3 Pages

Visualize you have to figure out how to stop world hunger. You decide to kill a bunch of people who suffer from world hunger every day. In the end world hunger is gone and no longer a problem in the United States. Did the actions you did to reach your goal justify. Ashoka had to ask himself this question too.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The Mughal empire was religiously tolerant under the rule of Akbar who was the grandson of Bubar. This allowed the reduction of tensions between the Hindu and Muslim communities in India rather than imposing Islam they encouraged a religion the Divine Faith bringing attention on the emperor as a common ruler to all religions and parts of the

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Gupta Empire–an ancient Indian empire–was founded in 320 CE, it survived until 550 CE. The Gupta Empire was made up of most of north and central India, and Bangladesh. It was known to be one of the most peaceful and wealthy civilizations of its time. The Mauryan Empire expired in 185 B.C.E due to the assassination of their king. For the next 50 decades, a large number of states were at constant war in India.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Political integration between both empires had both similarities and differences, most notably being different with the ways they chose those to rule. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy relied on local elites (landholders) and the middle-class citizens to control provinces. Imperial Rome was far less complex, compared to the bureaucracy of Han China. Many official positions within the government were bought or became hereditary through family wealth as opposed to earned by merit, due to this fact, the Roman bureaucracy often suffered from poor governance. One of the reasons the empire was so unified even

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

At the time, religion was a necessity for an empire to flourish because often times they created moral standards for people to follow not only in their daily lives, but also in their government. The Roman Empire had several religions before Christianity arose so in the beginning, the idea of a monotheistic religion was rejected. It was looked down upon because it was based on the idea of a “kingdom” of heaven. As it spread more and more, it started to become more widely accepted because of its philosophy of an orderly world and concern for social welfare. This led to most of Rome now believing in one socially interactive God.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, Ashoka used different antics to implement religion in his empire, which allowed his people to have religious freedom. (Doc 3) This approach kept Ashoka’s empire (the Mauryan) happy and led to lots of cultural diversity in south Asia. Ashoka’s policy is reflected when cultures like Buddhism spread to other parts of Asia, as seen on the map in document 8. Cultures expand because religious authority is significant to empires and keeps them united.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Two new empires rose in the Mediterranean and middle east; The Byzantine Empire & the Islamic Caliphates, the Byzantine Empire was run on Christianity while the Caliphates was run by the teachings of Muhammad and the holy book the Quran. While both the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Caliphates had major divides in their religion and also state, and they both recognized their head of state (Ceaser or Caliph respectively) also as a head religious leader, they based their political rulings from different sources, Byzantines’ from its Roman predecessor and the Islamic Caliphate from the Quran and Muhammad’s life and teachings. In both Empires, religion and politics worked had in hand, as the political leaders were also established as the head religious leaders. As their respective states both believed that religion, it gave the leaders lots of justification for different rulings and movements, such as expansion.

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Han China and Mauryan India had many similarities. They were both bureaucracies, they both had emperors, and both empires established their laws on religious belief. They also had a lot of contrasting ideas for positioning their people, and they had contrasting ideas for their different religious standpoints. One empire put more weight on logic, and the other more on religion.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

The views on Christianity throughout Rome changed immensely from the early years of the empire through the fourth century. For a while, Christians were looked at as a threat to many because of their belief in monotheism. Nero and his followers persecuted and punished the lower class and women who followed Christianity as well as use them as political scapegoats. As time went on, the tolerance for Christianity in Rome grew and Christianity gained acceptance. By the fourth century, Christianity was the official religion in Rome.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

This was due mostly to the Pagans and the Christians. Paganism was the official religion of Rome at that time, so when Christianity came to be, tension erupted between them. It is believed that the Pagans thought that the Christians would try to drive out the Gods, causing wars to break out between them, lasting many years and depleting most of the money of the Roman Government. Eventually, the Pagans came to the realization that the Christians were not trying to drive out their Gods.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

It can be seen that Christianity had the most significant changes in Roman society compared to the other religions. Christianity improved the social, cultural and political way

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

Ancient India had amazingly efficient and amazingly strong empires. India had two main empires the Mauryan and the Gupta. They affected India greatly by creating many amazing features. These empires were the roots for the rest of the Indian civilizations. Ancient India’ first civilization was so important since it influenced ancient and modern day India.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

EXAMINATION: HEAD—Significant Leaders and Accomplishments: Chandrgupta I (AD 319-34). was the founder of the Gupta empire (320- 550 C.E.). He passed down his thrown to his son Samdragupta (AD 335-80), Samdragupta expanded territory widely. Accounts say that he never knew defeat, the court poet Harishena wrote a report of the military exploits of the emperor, praising the strong ruler and listing all the peoples and countries that were taken over. Samdragupta was the patron of the arts and gave permission to build the Bodh Gaya, a large mosaic temple.

Read More

More about Similarities Between Roman Empire And Gupta India

Related Topics

Open Document