The absolute monarchs of the 1600s and 1700s all increased their power by decreasing the power the nobles had. When Louis XIV was king of France he decreased the power of the nobles by creating the palace of Versailles. In the palace of
For example, if a king is old and has a son, he passes his position to his son even if he is not mature enough to handle the responsibility of a king. The king does this to keep the power forever or for many other evil reasons. The son who becomes king would not do his duty because he cannot understand the needs and security of the people. In my opinion, the position of king is a power to secure the society therefore only the society should choose another king. The king should not have the power to replace his position.
“For all men being originally equals, no ONE by BIRTH could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever, and though himself might deserve SOME decent degree of honours of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them” (Paine). The descendent of the throne may be a fool and have no idea how government works leaving the inhabitants defenseless and at a disadvantage as rival empires or nation can attack and usurp the throne and lead to turmoil or anarchy. It also goes against the concept of “all men are created equal,” being royal by birth is a straight contradiction and creates further unnecessary division. “Another evil which attends hereditary succession is, that the throne is subject to be possessed by a minor at any age; all which time the regency, acting under the cover of a king, have every opportunity and inducement to betray their trust” (Paine). A minor as the ruling king may have no grasp onto what they’re doing and maybe swayed against doing well for society.
Having a lot of money is useful in many ways, but feeling that you are in control of everything is just being corrupt. A further one of wealthy people’s corruption is when people feel like they are the only ruler of the world! Since they are wealthy, they can also feel like they are the king/queen of the world and can do anything they desire. “New York City’s Courthouse”
Carnegie believes that, because they are richer and have more money, they should have the highest of all things possible. For example, they should have the nicest clothing and the biggest house with the most extravagant furnishings. However, this did present problems when it came to the poorer people. Document 7 showed a cartoon. The characters in the cartoon were portraying two different things.
Furthermore, Louis XVI Built the palace of Versailles specifically to control the nobles. He had all of the nobles come and live with him. In their place, he sent his loyal workers to spread his control throughout the land. With the nobles at Versailles, all the people of France were all directly connected to their king, and he had all of their loyalty. This was a feat never accomplished in England, the nobles were never totally controlled.
The rich leaders of this country are blinded by money and power, whereas The common people who struggle, can see clearly. This is shown in literature such as The biography of Frederick Douglas. Frederick Douglas along with the other slaves wanted to be left alone and left at peace but the powerful owners were peace less and hard on the slaves. A motto that I created to describe this is "the peaceful are powerless, because the powerful are peace less".
Kingship is an act of theater, requiring tailoring language, personality, and actions to the present situation. There need not be a deeper interior underneath. Having an interior self may detract from one’s ability to minimize personal values and desires and prioritize the kingdom’s
The wealthy have so much power because of the money they possess. They have the power to change the economy through production of goods and services which the less wealthy tend to live on. If they stop producing these goods or services, the less wealthy will collapse. Hunger Games touches on this issue. The more wealthy districts have more money to train, and have more of a probability to win the Hunger Games.
Although, through an absolute monarchy would only benefit the king and his noblemen, but the Magna Carta changed that when rights were given to the people. The Magna Carta greatly states, “Men in our kingdom shall have and keep all these liberties, rights, and concessions” (Britannica). To illustrate, the Magna Carta states no man will be denied of their rights or justice, instead will be equally among his heirs and the government. With that being said, no individual rights will be oppose under this justice system. Thus, from the article one of the constitution states, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Nevertheless, this is exactly what occurred when Thomas Paine, a political writer during the American Revolution, examined what his utopian society would look like. While More was led to the conclusion that a more totalitarian government would be most beneficial to society, Paine declares that all
In the Elizabethan age, social class structure was paramount. The class ranking dictated how the people of each level could dress, the diet and food available, and career standing. Social hierarchy classes consisted of a monarch, nobility, gentry, merchants, yeomanry, and laborer. The monarch was the highest and most superior class ranking, it was based off of bloodline only and the oldest monarch would take the throne and become the most powerful(“Elizabethan Era.”).
For instance, More asserts that “As long as private property remains, the largest and far the best part of mankind will be oppressed with an inescapable load of cares and anxieties” (1516). To clarify, hoggish individuals may hoard a voluminous amount of money by creating a monopoly from a private ownership. As a result, less powerful individuals cannot fulfill their basic needs with the sparse amount of money obtained. Hence, the tiered structure of society deprives the lower classes. In addition, More expresses how private ownership disables functionality of
If the ruler desires control or strength they might force the people below them to bow down to their ever will. If the ruler desires riches they might steal from the poor or up the price on an item to draw more out of someone who may not have much but needs that item. An example of someone who may do this is a king or a president. Someone with plenty of power to have away with this kind of stuff. In some cases, powerlessness can lead
Globalization Globalization has had a huge impact on the United States and other countries. Globalization is the spreading of political, cultural, and economic influences and connections among countries, businesses, and other means. Globalization began in the 1st century when the Europeans began to penetrate other parts of the world. It is based on the domination of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. Globalization has increased the ability of trade, technology, and cultural diversity.
