ipl-logo

Skeptic's Argument For The Existence Of The External World

761 Words4 Pages

One of the main questions surrounding the academic of Philosophy is in relation to the external world and its existence. Ever since Descartes Meditations, philosophers have long been engaged in discussion regarding whether the existence of the external world can be proven. On one hand, skeptics’ claim that one cannot know for certain whether the external world exists given that there is no proof thereof. Skeptics’ declare that one cannot begin to know anything about the external world as there is no way of distinguishing between reality and dreams. On the other hand, however, Philosopher G.E. Moore argues that there is a way to prove the existence of the external world. Therefore, this paper will consist of four main parts: an in depth explanation of Moore’s argument and how he defends his argument …show more content…

Skeptic’s argue that Moore can be deceived by his perceptions given that he is unable to distinguish between reality and hallucinations, preventing Moore from being able to separate reality and dreams. Therefore, the Skeptics’ argument is as follows; imagine there are two worlds – reality and a dreamland. In the real world, external objects exist, whereas in the dreamland, external objects do not exist with the exception of the individual. However, everything in the dreamland seems exactly the same as it would in the real world. Therefore: (P1) if an agent cannot distinguish between two situations, then that agent cannot know which of those two situations pertain, (P2) We cannot distinguish between reality and dream-world, (C1) Therefore, we cannot know whether reality or dream-world obtains, (C2) since there are external objects in reality but not in dream-world, we cannot know whether there are any external objects either (Citation

Show More
Related

Allegory Of The Cave And Skepticism Essay

932 Words | 4 Pages

There is much belief to suggest that we can depend on our senses unless there is just cause or evidence suggested to question their reliability. Therefore, the belief of reality may be subjected to interpretation or skepticism, but without solid evidence to discard what we believe to be true, we should be confident in what we hold to be true. Skepticism or Justified True Belief

Read More

The Problem Of The Criterion Chisholm Summary

828 Words | 4 Pages

In “The Problem of the Criterion,” Chisholm sketches a rough description of two forms of epistemology and seeks to display their interdependence in the designation of knowledge. By demonstrating this interdependence, he seeks to propose the position of the skeptic who asserts what is referred to as “universal skepticism,” the idea that it impossible to know anything. Chisholm begins this discussion by isolating two dividing questions: A) “What do we know? What is the extent of our knowledge?” B) “How are we to decide whether we know?”

Read More

Dreaming Argument: Skepticism Of The External World

513 Words | 3 Pages

Skepticism is the force that drives philosopher to continue challenging the unquestioned mass opinions. Skeptics are people who deny that we have knowledge about a specific subject. For example, a skeptic of the external world believes that we do not have any knowledge of the external world due to our perception of the world. Skepticism of the outside world argues that due to our perception, we are unable to have knowledge of the outside world. For instance, our eyes have deceived us do to illusions, like when hot asphalt looks like it has water on it.

Read More

Rene Descartes Dream Argument

1382 Words | 6 Pages

“Whatever I have accepted until now as most true has come to me through my senses. But occasionally I have found that they have deceived me, and it is unwise to trust completely those who have deceived us even once” (Descartes). By this, he means that our perceptions are deceptions created by our senses to trick us into believing that we are awake and going about our day when in actuality, we are dreaming and the world around us is an illusion. Hence, we shouldn’t trust our senses to give us any true knowledge of the world because it may always be deceiving us. It is true that senses can deceive, however, for us to know that our senses are deceiving us, we must differentiate between reality and what is deception.

Read More

Superhuman Powers In The Novel Watchman, By Alan Moore

149 Words | 1 Pages

In this paper I will support Moore in his argument

Read More

Russell's Simplicity Argument Essay

1500 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will consider Russell’s reasons for believing that there exists a mind-independent world. The philosopher offers few arguments, two of which will be outlined, namely, the argument for simplicity and the argument for instinctive beliefs. Though, the essay will argue that only Russell’s simplicity argument is effective since it stands against criticism. In fact, the critical discussion will be mainly focused on the simplicity argument because it provides more room for debate. Therefore, after an outline of both the arguments, this essay will aim to a narrow focus and explain only briefly why the argument for instinctive beliefs is unsound, while giving a deeper explanation of why the simplicity argument is valid and sound.

Read More

Ontological Argument And Rowe's Analysis

1686 Words | 7 Pages

To exist in reality, something must exist outside

Read More

Outlines Of Pyrrhonism By Sextus Empericus

496 Words | 2 Pages

Important to note before going forward are three outcomes to an inquiry believed to exist by the Skeptics, which are discovery, denial of the possibility of discovery and continued inquiry. The Skeptics have identified that the discovery and denial of the possibility of discovery are what the dogmatists are interested in when it comes to an inquiry. Sextus did not dispute the validity of the dogmatists’ argument. He considers that ‘grasp’ as used by the dogmatists could mean two things. The first being it could simply mean conceiving things.

Read More

Bad Dreams Evil Demons And The Experience Machine Analysis

1037 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most argued philosophical concepts about life revolves around the question, “What is reality?” Are we really awake, experiencing the real world or is your perceived reality just a dream? Christopher Grau, a philosophy professor, continues to analyze possible answers to those questions in “Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and The Matrix” by adding arguments from Descartes, Dancy, Putnam, Nozick, and Unger, and compares some of the parallels between the theories thought by the philosophers with concepts found in The Matrix. The main philosophical view-point discussed as well as argued is skepticism, but more specifically Cartesian skepticism.

Read More

Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis

726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More

Comparing Descartes 'Excerpts On Skepticism'

3649 Words | 15 Pages

Together these philosophers make two of the most influential philosophers of modern thought. However, in their essays, we will examine their opposing epistemological views. We will discuss certainty, first principle, skepticism and doubt

Read More

Is The Proof Of G. E Moore's Skepticism Argument

853 Words | 4 Pages

In this case and context, Moore argues that because he held up his two hands earlier, therefore two hands existed earlier meaning at least two external objects have existed in the past and those are two conclusive proof. Moore does acknowledge that he understands many philosophers, will still disapprove his rigorous proof but he, in turn, wants to know what exactly they would want as proof to a point that if they don’t get it they will not consider his proof. Moore proceeds by example. He says that he can give you an example of a belief that you can identify as knowledge even though you have no way of testing it. The example is the belief that you are awake right now and not dreaming.

Read More

You Think G. E. Moore Offers What He Calls A Proof Of External World

711 Words | 3 Pages

In “Proof of an External World,” G. E. Moore offers what he calls a proof of external reality. Do you think this is a successful proof? An excerpt from Moore, “I can prove now, 165 G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS for instance, that two human hands exist. How? By holding up my two hands, and saying, as I make a certain gesture with the right hand, 'Here is one hand', and adding, as I make a certain gesture with the left, 'and here is another'.

Read More

Comparing Descartes Views On The Difference Between Dreams And Reality

632 Words | 3 Pages

For example, how we know that tomorrow the sun will rise. We base our knowledge from past experiences, nonetheless, there is no test to show that the sun will come up other than waiting till the next morning to see if it occurs as expected. Yet, this opposition does not provide certainty that the event will happen according to the past experiences, there could be an extraneous variable which has never been part of our experiences that occurs and prevents the expected outcome of occurring. So, this counter argument would have to be explained in more detail because the skeptics can also say that in the end someone might have thought he was awake, and experienced things with certainty, when in reality they might have just dreamt it. Which in return would make premise two follow premise one

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Rene Descartes

727 Words | 3 Pages

An example is things in the distance look smaller than they actually are which is true. The same goes for his dream doubt argument, because I can distinguish my world when I’m awake and when I’m dreaming. The external world is supposed to be whatever exists outside of your own mind. The skeptics say that there are things in the external world but you can’t know whether there real or not. I don’t know if we can have knowledge of the external world because you can only know your internal world.

Read More

More about Skeptic's Argument For The Existence Of The External World

Related Topics

Open Document