ipl-logo

You Think G. E. Moore Offers What He Calls A Proof Of External World

711 Words3 Pages

In “Proof of an External World,” G. E. Moore offers what he calls a proof of external reality. Do you think this is a successful proof?
An excerpt from Moore, “I can prove now, 165 G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS for instance, that two human hands exist. How? By holding up my two hands, and saying, as I make a certain gesture with the right hand, 'Here is one hand', and adding, as I make a certain gesture with the left, 'and here is another'. And if, by doing this, I have proved ipso facto the existence of external things, you will all see that I can also do it now in numbers of other ways: there is no need to multiply examples. But did I prove just now that two human hands were then in existence? I do want to insist that I did; that the proof …show more content…

Of course, it would not have been a proof unless three conditions were satisfied; namely (1) unless the premiss which I adduced as proof of the conclusion was different from the conclusion I adduced it to prove; (2) unless the premiss which I adduced was something which I knew to be the case, and not merely something which I believed but which was by no means certain, or something which, though in fact true, I did not know to be so; and (3) unless the conclusion did really follow from the premiss. But all these three conditions were in fact satisfied by my proof.” With this information given, he is stating that if the premise was different from the conclusion then it would not be proof. He states, “The premiss which I adduced in proof was quite certainly different from the conclusion,, for the conclusion was merely ‘Two human hands exist at this moment’, but the premise was something far more specific than this – …show more content…

We can make assumptions but there has not been proof that the premises in his argument are true. If you cannot prove what you are saying, then it cannot be proven as truth. I need to be shown proof in order to accept his premises as true and I have not been given sufficient evidence to conclude this. If you are unable to prove something then you do not know it, so we cannot assume that we know because then we would need to prove it. I cannot assume that a hand exists behind my back just because we think it exists without it being perceived. I need to be shown proof of this and with following Moore’s ways to prove this, I am

Show More
Related
3370 Words | 14 Pages

That is, it seeks to prove its conclusion by work the globe. additionally to a posteriori arguments there's additionally another reasonably argument, AN a priori argument. AN a priori argument seeks to prove its conclusion simply by analyzing ideas victimization the school of reason. as a result of Hume is AN philosopher he doesn't believe that we are able to ever prove any matters of reality employing a priori arguments. However, he withal devotes a chapter of his book to assaultive the foremost renowned a priori argument for the existence of God: the metaphysics argument.

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

The Discourse on Method exhorted the reader to doubt everything. It advised him to take as false what was probable, to take as probable what was called certain, and to reject all else. The free-thinker should believe that it is was possible to know everything and should relinquish doubt only on proof. The senses were to be doubted initially, because they were also the source of hallucination; even mathematics might be doubted, since God might make a man believe that 2 and 2 made 5. With this book, Descartes revolutionized the form of scientific arguments.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Evidence/ Reasoning paragraph #2

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

Further, I have always seen such utterances as “there is a God” as axiomatic, and if I can liken this statement to the parable above then I also fail to see how “analogous” statements like “there isn’t a God” as significantly different. For each statement the criteria for the confirmation or refutation of them are quasi-arbitrarily set. In example, for the first explorer the presence of the garden is enough to confirm that there is a gardener who tends to it, and therefore he makes his statement, for the other explorer, his inability to find the gardener with his battery of tests is enough to confirm that there isn’t one, and he makes his. In essence, each “assertion” is irrefutable because the criteria for the confirmation or refutation of the statements are set by those making them and employed in ways to confirm the hypothesis of either. One is saying that that which cannot be found exists (outside the context of the “axiom” that there is a gardener) and the other that what

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

War is a natural, historical, repetitive event. World War Ⅰand World War Ⅱare the most well known wars that have happened in history to Canadians. Canada’s contributions to aid the Allies in both wars helped bring both to a swift end. Comparing both World War Ⅰ to World War Ⅱ, Canada’s contributions can be shown as not only heroic, but godly. When entering a war, a country must portray itself a certain way.

Read More
1656 Words | 7 Pages

He then says that without his knowledge of God's existence, none of his knowledge could be so clear and distinct. It is easy for one to be puzzled by how poorly this resolution was articulated; how is that Descartes' proof of the reliability of clear and distinct perceptions is because of the existence of a [non-deceiving] God, yet his proof of God’s existence [as a non-deceiver] is because of the reliability of his clear and distinct perceptions? This apparent circular reasoning, formally known as the Cartesian Circle, makes his argument appear weak and void. Both parts of the Cartesian circle make sense, but not together. It would have strengthened Descartes’ argument to better phrase this part of the

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

He also goes on to state that "it is wrong, always, everywhere and for anyone to believe something without sufficient evidence" (Notes, 2013, para. 17). For one to have

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

Craig validates that his argument, “the universe has a cause of its existence”, is true by assuming the initial premise that everything that

Read More
149 Words | 1 Pages

In this paper I will support Moore in his argument

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Even though we know there is no water, how can we trust our own perception if our eyes have deceived us in the past. They use these types of arguments to display their argument that we can not

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

Second, he proposes that for any p, if s is justified in believing p and s deduces some q

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Brett Lindsay Mr. Moore Newton's Laws Newton's three laws help describe the basic rules of physics. These laws that Isaac Newton had created, help mankind understand the complex branch of science known as physics, in a more simple way. These laws are present only because of natural forces such as inertia, friction, gravity, etc. Without natural forces, the world would appear much different and these laws would be incomprehensible. Newton's first law states that an object in motion must stay in motion (or object in rest must stay in rest) unless acted upon by an external force.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The evidence remains undeniable; nevertheless, others just need a bit extra

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More

More about You Think G. E. Moore Offers What He Calls A Proof Of External World

Related Topics

Open Document